Yes you can.
So far the answers that came up, says that you can but with many conditions like you have to dodge spyware, or only in private, or it cannot be group criticism etc. I don’t find their perspective particularly accurate.
It’s not really difficult to understand the rules regarding this. I’ll use an analogy.
You have a scalpel.
You use that scalpel to conduct surgery and make someone healthier.
It’s a great thing and it’s an act that’s encouraged. You are rewarded with the title of a Doctor.
Now let’s change this a bit.
You have a scalpel.
You use that scalpel to slash other’s neck and take the life of others.
It’s a horrible thing and you are hunted down. You are punished for such acts with the death penalty.
You can see that with the same tools, one can do something different. The intention and results of the actions using the same tool are the cause for the different endings.
In PRC’s case on criticism of the government…it’s very much the same.
Criticism of the government is allowed.
In some cases it is even encouraged.
It would even be better if you can offer a solution at the same time.
But if you use this tool given to you to create social unrest, incite a rebellion/seperation of the state, or generally speaking using this tool for self-interest with malicious intent towards the collective interest of the State and/or the citizens of the PRC, you WILL BE the enemy.
To further understand why this is so, you will need to know the difference in concept between the “State” in PRC and the “State” in other countries.
Politically, the State in most cases of the world’s government is a seperate entity from the population be it a monarchy, republic or democratic political entity. The State is this case, is an entity supposed to represent the population, whether this State is voted for, elected in, by succession, it does not matter. It is not the population itself. The mechanisms to prevent misrepresentation of the population by the State are there in the various forms of elections, rules and laws.
In PRC, the political situation is different. The State and it’s citizens are almost integrated as a single entity. Though they also have laws and constitutions in place to prevent themselves from going into chaos, I would say they are more towards SELF correcting measures. The state represents both itself and the citizens interest. One thing alot of people (both within PRC and without) does not understand is that the PRC (both the citizens and the State) are constantly in a self correcting mechanism. There are no timeframe for elections because there are no elections and no other political party challenging the CCP (No elections as in one person one vote), so they do not wait till it’s time to get votes to implement favorable policies for it’s own citizens. In other words, they do not need to get votes from it’s citizens to stay in power. Bad thing?
This is where there is a fundamental misconception to the difference in power structure. Most people I have talked to with regards to this would say that the state of governance in such a power structure will depend on the benovalence or capability of the goverment in charge. If an evil dictator is in charge, the people will suffer, but if a benovalent ruler is in place, the people will enjoy good times. This is true only to a certain extend.
The whole truth is that if an evil dictator is in charge, he will be replace faster than an election, and most of the time by the party in charge themselves. WHY? Because since there is no alternative mechanism to change the leader, the citizens will rebel and overthrow the government. The odds of success for a successful rebellion are extremely high for the PRC, the maths are there.
It’s 1.4 billion population vs 80 million CCP members + 2 million People’s Libreation Army. Try to go against the collective power of 1.4 billion and let me know the results.
So, the only thing to do to stay in power would be to do things and implement policies that are in the interest of the general population and at the same time, you would be doing yourself a favor to stay in power.
So if an evil dictator is in place at the helm of the party? Remove the bastard!
Bad economic policy? Change the damn policy!
Rampant poverty? Help the poor and eliminate poverty!
Citizens wants education? Setup more schools and give them books!
Risk of Muslim Terroism? Re-educated the potential muslim threat!
I might sound like I’m shouting simple slogans here. But that’s about what most individual citizens can do. Shout slogans. But as a collective, they are the State. They use their combined knowledge, wisdom and resources with the leadership of the party to work out a solution that benefits MOST of the citizens. That is how their system works and how they stay in power.
So back to the question, do they allow criticism? Yes, obviously. They have to, else they would be overthrown. But more importantly, they need criticism from THE CITIZENS to self correct themselves constantly. And they would welcome it even more if the criticism comes with a viable solution they can work on. But once again, if the intent of the criticism is to create social unrest, incite a rebellion/seperation of the state, or using this tool for self-interest with malicious intent towards the collective interest of the State and/or the citizens of the PRC, why should they not shut you up and put you away?
P.S From my knowledge, all the governments in the world have some form of laws that limits criticism against themselves. It is naive to think that you can go about criticising without limits.
Freedom of speech in the USA?
Check 18 U.S. Code § 2385 – Advocating overthrow of Government