China’s military has two crucial elements. They are…

• Defensive.
• Offensive.

The way that these two elements are used is unique to China, and some detail must be provided to fully grasp what this entails.

• Defensive. This is the army, the navy, and all other forces under control of the unified military command. Their job; their purpose, is to completely destroy any attacking / invasion force to Chinese land, people, territories and islands. Thus, they are a completely defensive military. They are only to be used in the protection and safety of China and Chinese people.
• Offensive. China has no ambitions to become the world’s hegemon. Thus, the offensive component is designed for strategic deterrence. In the event that China is attacked, then China MUST launch offensive missiles, and weapons. The reason for this is simple. Wars are never won on defensive posture. They must have an offensive component.

China’s missiles, and related systems are designed for precisely that. Were China to be attacked, say if the United States were to bomb TSMC in Taiwan, the defensive systems would clean the Pacific of all American ships and vessels. But, you know, that would not be enough.

China would be forced to maintain a defensive posture for eternity. Constantly fighting off, the swarming missiles and ships, and aircraft that the United States would launch at it.

To prevent this, the offensive systems would need to be activated. These include hyper-velocity glide vehicles armed with enhanced-radiation MIRV nuclear weapons. These would be targeted at the attacking nation (in this case the United States), as well as any supporting proxy nations, such as Japan, Australia and Manila.

So, as you can see, it’s really simple.

• An attack on Taiwan, is an attack on China.
• China would respond defensively in a tactical manner. Erasing all naval vessels and bases.
• China would also respond offensively in a strategic manner. Cleansing the civilian population centers with (environmentally friendly) “neutron” based nuclear warheads.
• The cities of the attacking nation(s) would be devastated, and thus a rapid end to the conflict would be guaranteed.

Of course, in this horrific scenario, the attacking nation(s) should be well aware of the risks that they are taking. They would realize that China would conduct war lethally.

So they would take prudent measures…

• Sacrificial nations will be identified and there they would take the brunt of the nuclear horror. The United States would make sure that China wastes it’s missiles on disposable targets like Brisbane, Perth, Sydney, Manila, and Tokyo.
• United States Naval vessels would be out of the range of most of the tactical weapons systems that China fields. Instead, European proxy nations (NATO) ships would act as diversion targets so that the American navy would still stay afloat.

And these have all been “gamed out” by China…

• Once the initial volleys of missiles cycled though their routine, the United States would launch prescheduled, preplanned MAD nuclear destruction on China.
• Which would trigger Russian “dead Hand”, and what ever survived China’s nuclear response, the Russian systems (dirty, deep, and very radioactive) would turn the United States into a barren lunar wasteland.

…

Awful. Right?

Nuclear war WILL ABSOLUTELY ERASE the United States. There is no scenario where it does not.

But, China, a culture that is over 6000 years old, will survive.

Oh quite the Opposite

All of China will thank him for it one day

Private Tutoring Industry was becoming way out of control.

Initially Tutoring was a boon, it helped Chinese students understand concepts pretty well

However as time went by Tutoring slowly became more and more deeply seated into the Chinese Education structure and every student began to lazily depend on Tutoring which meant Private Tutors could demand more money

With time it became almost like without private tutoring no Urban Chinese student could survive or do without

And slowly Private Tutorial Groups began to rise in value, start IPOs, bloat up without any assets and claim to be worth billions.

Is that a Golden Goose?

Please tell me how many Students do you know in US who go to SAT Coaching or GRE Coaching?

Most Students self study or study in Groups rather than pay for a Tutorial course

Yet in China – students using Private Tutorials rose to nearly 88% by 2019.

They used Tutors for everything and the basic concept understanding that created the Excellent Chinese Students of the 1990s -2010s would slowly be eroded if this nonsense had continued

Spoonfeeding at its worst

And on top of this Most Tutorials became Industries of their own and began marketing and began to ridiculously boost their own valuations

No!!! said Xi Jingping

He had many discussions with Respected Professors and Teachers and fundamentally covered the three Points in 2020 May which included

→ Private Tutorials cannot replace conventional education

→ Students ability to think and learn on their own are being affected by Private Tutorials

→ Private Tutorials are grossly inflated and taking full advantage of the Lax focus paid to them in the early 2005–2010

So the CPC said – Let Students who dont understand use Tutors and Tutorials but let Students not become lazy

Thus he decided to formulate and regulate the industry

It was a Brilliant Move

Those who wanted to become Billionaires with Tutoring – scrambled

Those who made good money and genuinely impacted Students to think – stayed and continued to nurture and build more students

Even Today Private Tutoring Exists

Only thing is – the Industry is regulated

Ceiling on Valuation, Mandatory insistence on Registration of Tutors, Syllabus being overseen by the CPC Education Committee to ensure Students can still think and learn on their own, No IPO allowed until 2032, Minimum 15 years for a Tutoring Company, Valuation based on Asset Valuation not Speculative Valuation, No Overseas investment in Private Tution Companies

The Result – The Sharks are GONE or going really fast.

Genuine Tutors and Tutorials are very much here to stay and help students especially weaker ones while also ensuring future students learn on their own and dont get spoonfed

And best of all -Tutorials dont replace Schools and control a Robotic Destiny of Students.

Easily one of the Finest Pieces of Legislation by a World Leader in the 21st Century

Basically he just got up in the morning, walked to the mic, and made the announcement to the world. Just like that.

Well, this action pissed off the Europeans big time, but there’s nothing they could do about it. It’s the quintessential “Beggar Thy Neighbor” policy where you find yourself in trouble, you get yourself out of trouble by passing the trouble to your neighbor. So the Europeans came back and said, well since you own more than half of the gold in the world (as a result of WWII), there’s nothing we can do about it. But can we at least meet and talk this through before you just go do it the next time? This is how the precursor of the G7, the “library group” was formed. It had 5 members – the US, UK, France, Germany, and Japan.

The original purpose of the G7 group was to do economic horse-trading behind the scenes, like, I’ll put in 1% stimulus if you cut your tariff by 20%, things like that, you know, that are best discussed IN SECRET because you are trading the economic welfare of one group of your citizens against another group of your citizens. The goal was to prevent these countries from killing each other economically, get it? It’s a forum to manage the economic in-fighting among this group of countries, so right away, people went out looking for allies. The US proposed adding Canada, and the Europeans countered with Italy. Then the Europeans proposed adding EU as a member (because the Dutch and the Belgian were pissed they weren’t represented), and the US countered with adding Australia. The French said forget it, too many Anglos in the room already. OK fine. That’s how we ended up with the G7 – the US, UK, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, and Canada.

What happened afterwards is that like all organizations, it started to take on roles that it was not designed to do. Election campaigns coming up, and some G7 member decided to use the occasion to do some political grandstanding – good for the votes, you know. This was universally resented by the other members of the G7, because when you do political grandstanding, you invariably do so at the expense of the other members. Nonetheless, when you throw together a group of politicians, what do you expect? It’s like putting together a group of drunks and expect no alcohol to be served in the party. It went quickly from one guy taking a small sip to everybody drunk as sh*t. It’s at one of these G7 meetings where Helmut Schmidt made his famous pronouncement on Margaret Thatcher – “she is a bitch, she is tough, she lacks scope and she cannot lead”.

Then in 2008, the sub-prime mortgage crisis hit. All G7 members went down the tube. So what do you do? You go look for somebody with money, yes, those despised “developing countries” who have been saving their pennies. Like China, India, Brazil, … I mean, seriously, all G7 countries, other than Germany, are in debt up to their necks. Do you expect them to manage their economy to the debtors’ satisfaction, or to the lenders’ satisfaction? So, from 2008 and onward, the G7 group completely changed its focus, from global economy to politics. The economic forum is taken over by G-20 major economies , which China participates.

As for the original G7, there is now talk to invite Russia back to G7, with the Germans and the UK loudly proclaiming that the Middle East security can not be solved without the Russians. So Russia is on track to be invited back in 2017. Now do you get which countries should participate in G7?

The “advanced, democratic” countries who are bombing the Middle East!

China is NOT “advanced”, NOT “democratic”, and most importantly, NOT bombing the Middle East.

Yes. The US empire was designed and built like Rome and it is following the footsteps of its falling as George Santayana(1905) said “Those who fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it”.

When considering the factors that led to the decline of Rome, it becomes evident that the similarities between the two situations are striking. The Roman Empire’s decline unfolded through a multifaceted progression, encompassing a blend of internal and external elements. The three major aspects that caused the eternal decline of Rome are internal decline, the dilution of a cohesive culture stemming from population expansion, and external challenges along the borders.

Internal Decline: (as seen in Daily headline news)

• Corruption, nepotism, and political infighting weakened Rome’s institutions and governance.
• Economic inequality grew, leading to social unrest and a widening gap between the elite and the masses.
• Moral decay and a loss of traditional values eroded civic virtue and weakened the fabric of Roman society.

Loss of Coherent Culture: (failed to assimilate the new legal and illegal immigrants)

• Rome’s expansion incorporated diverse cultures, diluting the sense of a unified Roman identity.
• Assimilation of various populations proved challenging, resulting in fragmented cultural practices and values.
• The empire struggled to integrate these diverse cultures, undermining social cohesion and a common purpose among its citizens.

The Decline of the Economy under the border problem of the American Empire: (Vietnam, Afghanistan, Ukraine, Taiwan, Southern boarder with Mexico)

• Constant external threats and invasions strained Rome’s military and economic resources.
• The need to sustain military campaigns and defense led to the debasement of the currency, causing rampant inflation and economic instability.
• Increased taxation to fund the empire’s defense further burdened the struggling economy.

The idea of “costs” is a Western utility.

You say, “a hamburger costs $1”, or a “Aircraft carrier costs $15 billion”.

And in so doing, you equate value to it.

In China, it’s very different.

Value is ascertained differently, and handled differently.

He needs a meal. He doesn’t have enough money. He is given the meal.

He wants the car. He hasn’t enough money. Salesman discusses ways to get a cheaper car in a better deal.

Students need books. Books appear.

Emergency hospital is needed. It is built.

While currency, and all the book keeping that it entails, is similar to that of the West. The utility and utilization of that medium of exchange is quite different.

In the case of PL-15(E) actual costs in terms of Western understanding will never be obtained. If China needs this missile, then it appears. And that is the way it is done. Book keeping is handled on a different level and is divorced from the entire process.

However…

Were China to sell this product to another nation; say Vietnam. The relationship as established by the diplomatic corps will determine the price that will be paid for it.

Which is unlike the West. Where costs are determined by the manufacturer of the product.

So in regards to ITEMS transferred by a GOVERNMENT system…

• China. Government related costs are handled on a personal basis.
• USA / West. Costs are uniform and determined by the civilian manufacturer.

…

Finally, a “sanity check”. For some perspective.

You run out of money.

And you need it soon. So you ask your friends for help

You ask your American friend.

He replies ‘Why do you need it?”, followed by a bunch of questions all requiring detailed answers. And at the end of the day, when it is all explained, he still refuses to lend you the money.

You ask your Chinese friend.

He replies “what’s your bank account number? Let me deposit it directly”.

That is the difference between the two societies.