screen 2024 11 08 10 32 36

Heffers as the American reality

My Mom! My so called dad abandoned his family for a woman next door when I was 11 with two brothers 9 and 4! He also took out a secret balloon loan on the house that my mom didn’t know about until the bank showed up and wanted full payment. This was the 60’s when a divorced woman couldn’t get any credit and was expected to go on welfare! My mother went to the bank and begged for a loan to keep a roof over our heads! They took a chance on her and she paid off a 30 year mortgage in 6 years working in a factory and raising 3 boys with an eighth grade education. She worked her fingers to the bone to give us everything we needed including college. I could never pay her back for all she did for us and she would not have taken anything if I had tried. She worked nights in the factory and came home to grow a garden, canned food and maintained the house making sure we had something to eat. She was everything to us and I still miss her every day.

The WORLD can’t compete with China’s Luxury Malls!

The Weight of Blue

Submitted into Contest #150 in response to: Write a story where an algorithm plays an important role. view prompt

Shuvayon Mukherjee

This story contains sensitive content

Content Warning: mentions of assisted dying. The couple sits across from me, her hand in his, and I ask myself if I have the strength to break their hearts. Her face hides nothing: tears already quiver, ready to fall no matter what I say. His fist rests on a rapidly bouncing knee.I tear my eyes away from the screen.“I’m so sorry. There is an incredibly high demand for fertility treatment. You aren’t eligible.”What comes next is painful enough, but not for the first time, it strikes me that I’m more than just another stranger in their lives. I’m not the passerby walking carelessly through a family photo, nor the tiresome subject of a story they’ll tell over Christmas lunch. For the rest of their lives, they’ll remember my face, my words, on the day they learned they would never have children of their own.I miss the days when a patient’s thrumming heartbeat or the whoosh of air in their lungs meant something. It is all about technology now. Someone who never set foot inside a hospital, who never saw the naked hope in a patient’s eyes, decided an advanced algorithm could determine a patient’s eligibility for treatment. All you need are their symptoms, medical history, and genetic profile.But rising costs of healthcare mean more and more people are missing out.And I’m the messenger.*Pa calls me on the train home, pulling me away from memories of strangled sobs and tear-stained shirts. His voice is weak.“My belly’s killing me, son,” he mumbles. “And I can’t crap.”“You’re constipated again. Did you take your laxatives?”He sighs. “I must’ve forgotten. The pain’s too much these days.”I know he’s not just talking about his belly. Two years ago, he tripped and fell down the stairs – often a death sentence for a frail ex-smoker in his mid-eighties. Instead, he somehow pulled through, even if he’s now dependent on a walking frame to get around.

 

Worst of all, the excruciating pain in his hip never went away. My Pa is a fighter, but he’s not too proud to call me in tears first thing in the morning, too stiff to get out of bed. Once, he pinched me hard on the arm, and when I yelped, he told me he felt that in his hip all the time.

 

The opioids and anti-inflammatories take the edge off, but they clog his bowels and space him out. I worry he’ll fall again. If he does, that’ll be the end of it.

 

“Son?”

 

“I know, Pa. The pain medication is your best bet. You aren’t eligible for surgery.”

 

“I just want the pain to stop. Can’t you rejig the algorithm or something?”

 

My silence is enough of an answer. He makes a noise that breaks my heart, sniffs, and hangs up.

 

*

 

A curious pair sits across from me today. She is over ninety and looks it: her skin is tinged yellow and thin as clingfilm, and her back is hunched almost ninety degrees. Even seated, she grips a wooden walking stick to keep herself steady. Yet, she is not the patient.

 

The elderly man sitting beside her in a wheelchair is her son. Seventy, and paraplegic. He is past the point of tears. He has a downcast look about him, as if he knows he’s the kind of patient the algorithm spits out and sticks under the table, discarded and forgotten.

 

“It starts in my hips,” he says, “then it spreads down both of my legs into my feet. Feels like I’m being electric-shocked. Stings something awful. Think I’m immune to the medication, doc. It doesn’t do nothing for the pain anymore.”

 

I nod sympathetically. “That sounds horrible. Yes, you are on the maximum dose. Unfortunately, the scans show that surgery is the only way to relieve your symptoms permanently.”

 

“Please, doc,” he whispers. “I don’t know how much more I can take. It’s too much.”

 

His words remind me of Pa. Chronic pain has a way of exhausting hope, and I wonder if there is any purpose in running the algorithm when we can all predict the outcome.

 

But before I can respond, his mother speaks up.

 

“I know what you’re gonna say. Time for the bloody algorithm,” she croaks. Her eyes fix on me defiantly, as if I’ve bullied her child at the playground.

 

The screen glows an upbeat green as it waits for me to enter his details. As with every patient, an analysis of his bloodwork has already been made. Once I enter the details of his pain, along with a list of medications he has trialled, the algorithm will estimate his potential surgical benefit, weighing this against the average score of other patients.

 

Unsurprisingly, paraplegia does his eligibility no favours.

 

I look back at them to begin my usual condolences, but something sticks the words in my throat. It could easily be my Pa sitting there without hope.

 

“Congratulations. You’re eligible,” I say. “I’ll have your surgery booked immediately.”

 

Their faces transform; the walking stick clatters to the floor as his mother almost leaps out of her seat to embrace him. Great, shuddering sobs wrack his body.

 

He spurs his wheelchair forward and takes my hand.

 

“Thank you, doc. This’ll change my life.”

 

I squeeze his hand back. “You deserve it.”

 

*

 

The algorithm doesn’t look kindly on disabled children. For a tool that is meant to be objective, it seems to share many of the biases of whoever created it – or perhaps those of society as a whole.

 

The child gamboling before me looks perfectly healthy for a six-year-old with Down Syndrome. Thus far, her development has followed the expected trajectory, and all of her vital signs are within normal parameters. All this despite the lump of cancer cells growing inside her brain.

 

“Why even run the algorithm?” her father asks. “She obviously needs surgery. You need to get that thing out.”

 

“It’s part of the healthcare protocol, sir. There’s a process that needs to be followed.”

 

“Screw your protocols. My daughter has a brain tumour. You don’t need a fancy degree to figure out she needs surgery.”

 

“I’m sure she’ll be eligible,” I say truthfully. I don’t voice my suspicion she might be waiting months for her operation, given the absence of any major symptoms.

 

“Every minute we wait is a minute that thing’s inside her head, damaging her brain. I just want her to live a normal life. Please, do it quick.”

 

I run the algorithm. The green screen blinks, then flips to blue. The computer chimes a confirmation.

 

“She’s eligible,” I tell him.

 

“Good. How long?”

 

I click through several more screens. My heart sinks.

 

“Eight months.”

 

Preparing myself for a verbal onslaught – there is usually at least one per day – we lock eyes for a tense moment. But then he looks away and kneels next to his daughter, whispering something in her ear that makes her giggle. He strokes her hair and wipes his eyes with his shirtsleeve.

 

“Why be a doctor?” he says finally. “Why do this, if you can’t help people?”

 

I consider saying that I did help. That she is getting surgery. But I don’t, because I know those words are just as pointless as my condolences.

 

“There might be more I can do,” I say.

 

The child’s positive eligibility test has placed her on the waiting list for an operation. The eight-month timeframe is a guarantee, but if another patient loses their place, she could have surgery within a month. I enter her details, looking for a “less worthy” patient for her to replace.

 

Only one patient pops up.

 

A paraplegic man who was never meant to be eligible at all.

 

On the train ride home, when I should think of the ecstatic father bouncing up and down with his daughter on his shoulder, whooping and punching the air, instead I consider my Pa and people like him. The ones society always remembers last.

 

*

 

It’s been over a year, and my paraplegic patient is struggling. His pain is severe enough that he over-medicates himself in a futile effort to live a normal life. The electric shocks have spread into his arms, his fingers tingle, and his feet have permanent pins-and-needles.

 

I book him another appointment to deliver the news about his surgery. Before they even enter the room, I can hear dull, rhythmic thuds under the mechanical whir of his wheelchair, like a heartbeat trapped in a cage of machinery.

 

His mother leans heavier on her walking stick, but it is his appearance that affects me the most. His face is wan and sunken; devoid of colour. The pain has taken its toll.

 

“My boy’s still suffering. Why are we here?” she says without preamble.

 

My expression must have given it away, because he speaks first.

 

“Never getting surgery, am I?”

 

His voice is oddly changed, compared to his face. It’s stronger than before. More resolute.

 

I shake my head, unable to meet his eye. His mother glares at me. Her hand snakes across and rubs his shoulder.

 

“Then I’ve had enough,” he says.

 

“What?” she chokes out. Her attention shifts to him, and the hand holding her walking stick starts to tremble.

 

“Can you do the algorithm again, doc?” he pleads.

 

“It won’t change the result,” I reply.

 

“Not for the surgery. I told you the first time: it’s too much. Can’t live with it anymore. If you can’t fix it – if I can’t stop suffering – at least let me choose a quick, painless way to go. On my own terms.”

 

She’s shaking her head now. She watches her son with an intensity I’ve never seen. As if she wants to memorise every last wrinkle on his face.

 

Two desperate pairs of eyes bore into me as I turn back to the computer. I imagine my Pa in such a position – confronting mortality. I wonder if he would look at me the same way.

 

Ignoring the lump in my throat, I run the algorithm again, this time for physician-assisted dying.

 

The green screen turns blue, chimes joyfully. Eligible.

 

He sighs in relief, all the air rushing out of him at once. A bit of colour returns to his face. For the first time in a year, he smiles.

 

“No,” his mother whimpers.

 

*

 

When their appointment ends twenty minutes later, she pauses at the door.

 

“Run along for a minute,” she sniffs to her son, waving a hand as if he’s five years old again. The whirring fades into the corridor.

 

“How can I help?” I ask, dreading the answer.

 

She blinks and looks up at me. “I’m ninety-four, dear. Everything hurts, and all of my senses are failing. There’s not much left to live for. Only him.”

 

“I see.” I’m already moving back to the computer.

 

She shuffles close behind, still sniffing. I sit down, open up her file, and enter in her details.

 

“Are you sure about this?”

 

Her eyes take on the glaze of long-held memory. There’s the shadow of a smile.

 

“Yes. As sure as when I first wanted a child of my own.”

 

I run the algorithm, reminded of what it had once taken from a devastated couple in the same seat. I consider why an equation capable of denying new life can equally save it. How a system designed to preserve lives can easily take them.

 

And I ask myself if I still have the strength to bear the algorithm’s message.

 

It now deliberates the weight of one life – or two.

 

Green turns to blue.

 

Chicken Verde Tacos

02c921c02dd85512d7804d4cd7fab166
02c921c02dd85512d7804d4cd7fab166

Ingredients

  • 8 tomatillos, husks removed
  • 2 or 3 poblano peppers
  • 1/2 medium sweet onion, chopped
  • 2 cloves garlic, chopped
  • Cilantro, washed thoroughly
  • 3 or 4 tablespoons canola or olive oil
  • Salt
  • Pepper
  • Corn tortillas (you can also use soft flour tortillas, if preferred)
  • 1 roasted chicken (I use store bought rotisserie chicken because it’s easy)
  • 1 to 2 tablespoons granulated sugar

Instructions

  1. Heat oven to 400 degrees F. Arrange tomatillos on a tray and roast for about 15 minutes. Remove and let cool.
  2. Turn oven to 475 degrees F.
  3. Put poblanos on foiled lined baking sheet and roast until skins turn bubbling and partly black. (You can also do this on a grill). Once charred, remove peppers from oven and let cool. When cooled, peel off skins, remove stems and seeds. (If you like spicier food, leave seeds in peppers.)
  4. In a small pan, sauté chopped onion and garlic in enough oil (about 3 tablespoons) so the garlic does not burn. Sauté until onions are softened and slightly translucent. Remove from heat and combine the tomatillos, poblano peppers and the onion and garlic mixture (oil included) into a blender and throw in a handful of cilantro. Add salt and pepper to taste and 1 tablespoon of sugar to balance the bitterness of the tomatillos. Blend until smooth. (Taste after blending. If still slightly bitter, add more sugar to taste.
  5. Meanwhile, take chicken, remove skin and break up meat into shredded pieces. Make sure no bones get in. Put the shredded chicken into pan used to sauté onions and garlic, pour verde sauce over top and heat on medium-low heat until warmed through.
  6. Heat tortillas by package directions. Fill each with chicken verde mixture. Eat as is or you can add your favorite toppings like hot sauce, sour cream, cheese, tomatoes or lettuce.

Great way to bring back the US Dollar right?

Threatening people and forcing them to use it

What next?

A Military Invasion in 20/30/40 countries to force them to use the Dollar


Here is why this won’t work

Let’s take household appliances

Nearly 87% of Appliances sold in US are fully assembled and imported into the US

Of these :-

China is the largest exporter with 61.9%

Vietnam is next with 14.4%

India is third with 8.6%

Forget Vietnam for the moment

India and China are BRICS Members

So a Television that costs $ 1,199 in Walmart will now cost $ 1,909

Laptops costing $ 2,700 will now cost $ 4,100

Toys that cost $ 33.50 will cost $ 54

A Christmas shopping budget of $ 2,500 now rises to $ 4,000

Sales will plummet in the US

This is 87% not 8.7%

You can’t replace even 25% of these industries over the course of the next 12–25 years


Sure India will be hit and China too

Their US orders will fall

Yet their damage would be far lesser

After 3 years :-

Cost to the Economy of India $6–$9 Billion

Cost to the Economy of China – $ 40 Billion

Cost to the Economy of the US – $ 200–350 Billion

This is just appliances alone

Add vehicle parts and chemicals and the damage could exceed $ 1.5–2 Trillion in sustained damage


This is the same as blowing off your hand with a Shotgun to prevent a mosquito from biting your forearm

Sure the Mosquito doesn’t get it’s blood but it may fly and get another guy and drink his blood

You are crippled for life

MM Kitten art with AI

AlbedoBase XL Create a anatomicallyaccurate photo realistic Ba 1(3)
AlbedoBase XL Create a anatomicallyaccurate photo realistic Ba 1(3)
AlbedoBase XL Create a anatomicallyaccurate photo realistic Ba 0(3)
AlbedoBase XL Create a anatomicallyaccurate photo realistic Ba 0(3)
AlbedoBase XL Create a anatomicallyaccurate photo realistic Ba 2(3)
AlbedoBase XL Create a anatomicallyaccurate photo realistic Ba 2(3)
AlbedoBase XL Create a anatomicallyaccurate photo realistic Ba 3(3)
AlbedoBase XL Create a anatomicallyaccurate photo realistic Ba 3(3)
AlbedoBase XL Create a anatomicallyaccurate photo realistic Ba 0(2)
AlbedoBase XL Create a anatomicallyaccurate photo realistic Ba 0(2)
AlbedoBase XL Create a anatomicallyaccurate photo realistic Ba 1(2)
AlbedoBase XL Create a anatomicallyaccurate photo realistic Ba 1(2)
AlbedoBase XL Create a anatomicallyaccurate photo realistic Ba 2(2)
AlbedoBase XL Create a anatomicallyaccurate photo realistic Ba 2(2)
AlbedoBase XL Create a anatomicallyaccurate photo realistic Ba 3(2)
AlbedoBase XL Create a anatomicallyaccurate photo realistic Ba 3(2)
AlbedoBase XL Create a anatomicallyaccurate photo realistic Ba 1(1)
AlbedoBase XL Create a anatomicallyaccurate photo realistic Ba 1(1)
AlbedoBase XL Create a anatomicallyaccurate photo realistic Ba 0(1)
AlbedoBase XL Create a anatomicallyaccurate photo realistic Ba 0(1)
AlbedoBase XL Create a anatomicallyaccurate photo realistic Ba 3(1)
AlbedoBase XL Create a anatomicallyaccurate photo realistic Ba 3(1)
AlbedoBase XL Create a anatomicallyaccurate photo realistic Ba 2(1)
AlbedoBase XL Create a anatomicallyaccurate photo realistic Ba 2(1)
AlbedoBase XL Create a anatomicallyaccurate photo realistic Ba 1
AlbedoBase XL Create a anatomicallyaccurate photo realistic Ba 1
AlbedoBase XL Create a anatomicallyaccurate photo realistic Ba 0
AlbedoBase XL Create a anatomicallyaccurate photo realistic Ba 0
AlbedoBase XL Create a anatomicallyaccurate photo realistic Ba 3
AlbedoBase XL Create a anatomicallyaccurate photo realistic Ba 3
AlbedoBase XL Create a anatomicallyaccurate photo realistic Ba 2
AlbedoBase XL Create a anatomicallyaccurate photo realistic Ba 2

Consumers Are Drowning In Debt As Hordes Of Businesses Fail All Over The U.S.

U.S. consumers have piled up the largest mountain of household debt in the history of the world.  If the federal government was not almost 36 trillion dollars in debt, the fact that U.S. households are nearly 18 trillion dollars in debt would be making a lot more headlines.  Sadly, our entire society is absolutely saturated with debt at this point.  Government debt on all levels is spiraling out of control, corporate debt has ballooned to absurd levels, and consumers have been gorging on debt as if there will never be any consequences.  Unfortunately, a time of reckoning has arrived, and it is going to be incredibly painful.

On Wednesday, we learned that total credit card debt has surged to a brand new record high of 1.17 trillion dollars

Collectively, Americans now owe a record $1.17 trillion on their credit cards, according to a new report on household debt from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York.

Credit card balances rose by $24 billion in the third quarter of 2024 and are 8.1% higher than a year ago.

Needless to say, incomes have not increased by 8.1 percent over the past year.

So our credit card balances are growing faster than our paychecks are, and that is a problem.

Meanwhile, total student loan debt has reached a brand new record high of 1.61 trillion dollars.  If you can believe it, a whopping 30 percent of all student loan borrowers have “gone without food or medicine due to their monthly bills”

  • Thirty percent of federal student loan borrowers say they’ve gone without food or medicine due to their monthly bills, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau finds.
  • In addition to skipping necessities, 38% of people with federal student loans said they carried credit card debt that they wouldn’t have otherwise, the bureau found.
  • Around 44% of borrowers said their education debt delayed when they could by a home, and 26% said the debt pushed back when they’d start a family.

If you are a young person that is considering going to college, please try to avoid piling up student loan debt.

It can haunt you for decades.

Overall, total household debt in the United States has skyrocketed to a brand new record high of 17.94 trillion dollars

The Federal Reserve Bank of New York’s Center for Microeconomic Data today issued its Quarterly Report on Household Debt and Credit. The report shows total household debt increased by $147 billion (0.8%) in Q3 2024, to $17.94 trillion.

What a nightmare.

How did we ever allow ourselves to pile up nearly 18 trillion dollars in household debt?

That is insane!

Our wild spending fueled solid economic growth for a long time, but now most consumers are just barely scraping by from month to month and businesses all over the country are deeply struggling as a result.

For example, U.S. retailers have announced the closing of 6,481 stores so far in 2024…

U.S. retail closures have reached the highest level since the COVID-19 pandemic, according to recent estimates.

As of Nov. 8, retailers have announced 6,481 store closures, an increase of 336 closures in just the past week, according to the latest data from Coresight Research. The majority of these closures were driven by American Freight, which is shutting all 329 of its locations as part of its parent company’s bankruptcy proceedings.

Meanwhile, the auto industry is having a very tough time adjusting to lower consumer demand.

Last week, we learned that Nissan will be eliminating “9,000 jobs and a fifth of its manufacturing capacity”

Nissan Motor shares slumped 6% in Tokyo trade Friday, a day after the Japanese automaker said it would cut 9,000 jobs and a fifth of its manufacturing capacity as it struggles with sales in China and the United States.

On Thursday, Japan’s third-biggest automaker slashed its forecast for full-year operating profit by 70%. It said restructuring would cut costs by 400 billion yen ($2.61 billion) in the financial year to the end of March.

Ouch.

Stellantis is another automaker that has decided it is time to reduce production and lay off workers…

Stellantis is indefinitely laying off more than 1,000 employees at its Jeep assembly plant in Ohio as the automaker significantly reduces its inventory levels to match demand.

Stellantis, the parent company of Chrysler, Jeep, Dodge and Ram, issued Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification (WARN) notices to the respective state and local governments as well as the United Auto Workers union.

The 1,100 layoffs at the Toledo South Assembly Plant will be effective as early as Jan. 5.

Sadly, I think that this is just the beginning of very tough times for the auto industry.

The tech industry is facing enormous challenges too.  In fact, chipmaker AMD just announced that it will be reducing the number of workers that it employs globally by about 4 percent

″As a part of aligning our resources with our largest growth opportunities, we are taking a number of targeted steps that will unfortunately result in reducing our global workforce by approximately 4%,” an AMD representative said in a statement. “We are committed to treating impacted employees with respect and helping them through this transition.”

At least AMD is still treading water.

There are countless other firms that are falling apart right in front of our eyes.

Spirit Airlines is one of the latest victims.  Spirit’s share price suddenly crashed when it announced that it will be filing for bankruptcy

Spirit Airlines is preparing to file for bankruptcy protection, it emerged last night – sparking fears among flyers about mass cancelations.

After news broke about the bankruptcy emerged on Tuesday evening, Spirit’s share price plummeted 45 percent in just seconds – erasing hundreds of millions in market value from the carrier. By Wednesday morning, it was down by 70 percent.

The Florida-based low-cost airline is in final negotiations with bondholders on a restructuring plan to secure the support of key creditors, the Wall Street Journal reported this evening. It owes more than $3 billion.

This is what happens when a debt bubble bursts.

At this stage, things are so bad that even CNN is getting ready to conduct some very harsh layoffs

CNN is planning to wield the axe on some of its high-paid staff after dismal election ratings that cap off a disastrous period for the cable news network.

According to an explosive new report from Puck, network executives will unleash sweeping lay-offs in a bid to save the network’s flailing reputation.

It comes after the departure of stalwart Chris Wallace, and amid reports senior stars like Wolf Blitzer and Jake Tapper have both been denied raises.

Of course the carnage is not just limited to large businesses.

The percentage of small businesses that cannot pay their rent has reached the highest level since the peak of the pandemic, and that should deeply alarm all of us…

Close to half of small business owners couldn’t pay their rent in September, marking a new three-year high.

According to business networking platform Alignable’s September Revenue & Rent Report, 48% of small business renters could not make their rent payments. That was up from 41% in July and August. And it was the highest it has been since the Covid recovery era in March 2021, when 49% of small business owners were delinquent.

So what is the bottom line?

For years, we were able to enjoy a ridiculously inflated standard of living by piling up staggering amounts of debt.

But now that debt bubble has started to implode, and a tremendous amount of pain is on the horizon.

Going into massive amounts of debt may be enjoyable for a while, but it always catches up with you in the end.

Those that are telling you that there is an easy way out of this mess are not being honest, and we only have ourselves to blame for what is about to happen.

I heard a rumor about how China’s proposal of banning unmanned warfare got rejected in UN security council.

So if unmanned weaponries are allowed, China must catch up with the west.

In this years China International Aviation & Aerospace Exhibition, China presented to the world with all kinds of unmanned stuff:

Carrier UAV “Jiu Tian” (top of the sky):

main qimg 01626a62c1b24284c31cd2e94202734e
main qimg 01626a62c1b24284c31cd2e94202734e

Range 7600KM, ceiling 18000 meters, payload 6.6 tons.

Besides all kinds of missiles, it can also carry drone hives.

main qimg da4b4c0d00c77444cd7c7fd2e9139a11
main qimg da4b4c0d00c77444cd7c7fd2e9139a11

Caihong-7 (rainbow 7) UAV.

Wingspan 27+ meters, ceiling 16000 meters, maximum takeoff weight 13 tons, max range 10800KM, hang time 15 hours.

2 such UAVs could patrol one sector 24*7.

Hu Jing (killer whale) USV

500 tonnage, 4+4 dual band phased array radar, 4x VLS, torpedos, spying UAV, max speed 40 knots, invisible design.

This 500 ton gnome has more phased array radar than an US destroyer.

Jiqi Lang (machine wolf)

main qimg 9a5613cf1fcbb3fc025c2a19b369dddb
main qimg 9a5613cf1fcbb3fc025c2a19b369dddb

The regular model carriers a type 191 assault rifle

We also see similar done with RPG on it.

Because of China’s largest manufacturing in human history, one of such wolf could only worth 20 to 50K USD (my guess), which is far cheaper than human soldiers. They are small and fearless, and can suddenly appeared at your 6 in street combat.

I mean… literally thousands of them.


Also,

all these unmanned weaponries can cooperate with each other or PLA soliders.

Here are some demonstrations:


China is not able to nor has the need to conquer US mainland.

main qimg cf73930740381fabbed8ff71a3bc736a
main qimg cf73930740381fabbed8ff71a3bc736a

If there would be a war between China and the US, it would most likely be somewhere near China. Such as South China Sea, Taiwan Strait, or somewhere around Japan.

Within this range, US military has no chance defeating PLA.

“It’s ALL Pre-PLANNED…” – Whitney Webb

Yes it is.

Ex-Israeli Space Head Interview On UAPs: Aliens Exist & Working With US Astronauts On Mars

In Decemberes it is. 2020, Haim Eshed, a retired Israeli general and former head of the Israeli Defense Ministry’s space directorate gained attention for making controversial claims about extraterrestrial life and alleged secret collaborations between humans and aliens. He stated that aliens and the U.S. government had reached some type of deal to stay quiet about their experiments on Earth and secret facilities on Mars.

In his claims, Mr. Eshed said ETs exist and monitor our nuclear capabilities. There is a “Galactic Federation,” and the alien species with whom humanity will contact is “Grey.” According to him, Earth is their Petri dish, and they are also trying to understand the whole fabric of the universe. He further stated that some of the smaller UFOs are robots/AI, consciousness is present after death, and humans have anti-gravity technology but it is still classified.

The above-mentioned information was shared by Mr. Eshed in his book “The Universe Beyond the Horizon,” published in November 2020 and discussed in his interview with Israel’s daily newspaper “Yedioth Aharonot.” He had been a director of space programs for the Israel Ministry of Defense for nearly 30 years, is a former chair of the Space Committee of the National Council for Research and Development for the Ministry of Science, Technology, and Space, and is a member of the steering committee of Israel Space Agency. He is responsible for the launch of 20 Israeli-made satellites and is widely cited as the father of Israel’s space program. (Source)

In the book, Eshed makes implausible claims that include stories of how aliens prevented potential nuclear disasters, including an unspecified nuclear incident during the Bay of Pigs Invasion. Below is the English translation of his interview titled “The UFOs asked not to advertise that they are here, humanity is not yet ready,” where he also discussed the Skinwalker Ranch and alleged contact between aliens and US presidents.

Until recently, Eshed actually managed to hold back, but then Trump officially established the “Space Force”, and the press was given an announcement that the Pentagon’s Task Force for Unidentified Aerial Phenomena” would begin publishing its findings to the public every six months. At the same time, the “Skinwalker” cattle ranch of the American billionaire Robert Bigelow in Utah – a place that was previously suspected to be a favorite destination for extraterrestrials – recorded some things that no amount of popcorn in the world would be enough to watch.

“Unidentified phenomena have now been recorded at this farm,” said Eshed. “A team of scientists from NASA and MIT graduates brought all possible instruments there – cameras, spectrometers, spectrographs, gamma-rays, X-rays, UV, IR, all fields, and they saw things that I was left with my mouth open. I spoke with Prof. Isaac Ben-Israel (currently the chairman of the Space Agency) who was also thrilled.”

What did they see there? “You know the term portal in this context? So you see a UFO appear there – you photograph it in the entire spectrum of the cameras, you see the radiation in all frequencies, it’s raging!”

Could not it be some familiar aircraft? “No! It shows definite signs of UFOs: crazy accelerations, lack of gravity, 90-degree changes of direction at tremendous speeds, shape-shifting. And all the scientists there are in complete shock.”

And what is the UFO doing? “ You see the radiation jump, and you see how a shape-changing body arrives, light comes out of it at a frequency that you cannot see with the naked eye – in fact, you do not see anything when you look normally – but with the cameras, at the high frequencies, you see this body perform” Kill from utilization’ – drawing blood from the cattle on the ground in front of your eyes.”

What exactly did they see? “Something like a cloud like that. Like you draw a ghost for children. It’s like an undefined cloud, amorphous, and the horns come out of it, and you see the cow twitching. And when it’s over, everyone runs to the field to see, and there’s nothing there, no blood – but the cow’s body has a cut which is like with a laser. They removed its organs and pumped the blood! If they had told me that, I would have said: Shit, it’s a show. But professors from MIT and leading researchers have seen and confirmed it, and everyone is shocked. So listen, we have to at least check.”

Why does not Robert Bigelow himself tell about it? “He received huge funding from NASA as part of programs that my friends there only mumble about under their breath, and he made a written commitment that everything goes to the Pentagon and is housed there. It upsets him that the Ministry of Defense is not ready to release anything.”

…American presidents also testified to this. Truman admitted seeing a whole bunch of aliens over Washington. Nixon, who was a friend of comedian Jackie Gleason and knew he was crazy about UFOs, told him, ‘I’m going to make your life’s dream come true,’ and took him to the White Patterson base and showed him alien bodies. Gleason got depressed about it. Eisenhower’s granddaughter testified that her grandfather had signed an agreement with the aliens, that they would have a secret landing base here in Area 51 in Nevada, that they could come in contact with a small number of people, conduct experiments, and that the condition was that they provide us with technologies — for example, anti-gravity.

And we received these technologies? Yes. We have anti-gravity and other things. So why are they hiding from us and how can all the governments and armies in the world be able to cooperate in concealment of this magnitude? Not “all the world governments”. There is a group of partners – the Americans, the Russians, the Japanese, the English, and the Chinese – all coordinated at a level that is still not allowed to publish, and those who asked not to publish it are them.

Who are “them”? The Galactic Federation. Is there such a thing? It exists. I wrote about it even though it was perceived as a conspiracy theory, but lately former senior generals are also saying to publish [sic], and Trump was on the verge of finding out, and a few mainstream professors are also saying: guys, tell us. But the aliens in the federation say: wait, let the spirits calm down first, do not publish yet because look what’s happening. You’re still fighting each other, you’ll destroy yourself.

Why not come and talk to us directly? Because it will create panic and collapse humanity. What will happen? The markets will collapse, there will be nothing to eat, people will become cannibals, hospitals will be shut down, all the dark passions will come out, it may be the end – and they are not interested in it. On the contrary, they are constantly keeping track – and there are a lot of reports about it – the nuclear events in the world, they are monitoring all the stations and nuclear weapons bases – I am willing to give you all the things in writing [sic] – and there have been things they have prevented. Know that it is not just luck that the Russians in the Bay of Pigs did not use nuclear weapons against the Americans. Someone neutralized it. Without them I have no doubt that humanity would have already destroyed itself. They want to say to humanity: children, calm down!

Why not make contact when their intentions are peaceful and say so explicitly? The UFOs have asked not to publish that they are here, humanity is not ready yet. There will be a great rampage of everyone, and what the Inquisition did to guys like Galileo and Copernicus will return. They want to make us sane and understand first. In general, what are space and spacecraft – think, in World War I we did not even have planes – and they do not want mass hysteria here, with the best example being what happened in 1938, with Orson Welles’ World of Wars show, and the police collapsed and everything exploded And what they say is: first of all let’s stand, that the stock markets will not fall, that there will be no rampage, that humanity will calm down a little.

Are we in communication with them regarding the date of publication? There is an agreement between the U.S. government and aliens – I can not prove it, I understand it sounds like a conspiracy theory – but the understanding is that the Galactic Federation has nine elements of advanced aliens of various kinds, who signed a contract with us to do experiments here.

What interest do they have in us? There are all kinds of resources here. There is water here in quantities that are not found nowhere else, there is all kinds of vegetation, all kinds of animals, the ocean.

But for an intelligent species more developed than us, how are we useful to them? We are their petri dish. They too are researching and trying to understand the whole fabric of the universe, and they want us as helpers. To date the petri dish has not been stabilized – but it is estimated that we are reaching this stage: religion is accepting their existence – the Vatican has already announced that it wants to baptize them; the UN has appointed an ambassador for foreign affairs (Molan Othman); the corona calmed everything and brought us closer to them.

Come on, in the present age there is no way such a thing would have been kept secret. How many years have they kept a secret that the earth is not the center of the universe? 1,500 years. Or the ‘Manhattan Project’ (US atomic bomb project)? Do you know how many people worked there? 150 thousand people. How many knew what it was? Three. So if you want to keep such a thing a secret, you can. And there is a terrible, obsessive system of silence, of the Americans, who have decided, under the guidance of the aliens, who are not yet publishing. Robert Bigelow also said: I can not publish the films.

How many life forms are there in space? There are thousands of stars with conditions similar enough to ours, and serious scientists have identified and documented dozens of life forms – even though the mainstream does not accept it. The closest to us are what we call the ‘grays’, which are gray creatures with large eyes with them.

Where are they in geographic relation to us? Supposedly some came from the Pleiades, planets that have living conditions we know of – we can not get there, but they can get to us because they are much more advanced.
Where else in the neighborhood is there life? “There is an underground base on Mars. There are their representatives there as well as our American astronauts.” How do we know that? “Do you want articles? There are. But science, so far, doesn’t want to hear.”

What does their craft look like? The big spacecraft is almost the size of a small town. Small spaceships come out of it – most of them robotic, manned by intelligent robots. At first, they will send such robots, primitive to them, or a message we will have to decipher.

To reach us they need to move at least at the speed of light. What is their propulsion method – rocket? Nuclear? No. They have a method of producing a bubble that neutralizes time-space, and the tool does not move – space moves, and this is consistent with general relativity. Take for example an ant that wants to get from one end of a page to the other. Now let’s say I folded the page in half – it moves to its other side in a second. That’s how you fold time-space as well.

What do they use to move time-space? This is a bit of complex physics; motion is based on dark energy – 25 percent of the universe is dark matter – which allows time-space to be distorted and reach other galaxies in no time. You can create a tiny black hole – that, by the way, is what you do with a particle accelerator in Switzerland – that sucks stars out quickly and spits them out. These are technologies that sound like science fiction but we are at the threshold.

And what will happen when they come to us? Humanity will connect to the fabric of the universe, and once we connect, our science will leap in thousands of years, we will be capable of anti-gravity, we will move between star systems, religion will lose the control it has today – aliens do not believe in religion, they believe in deciphering the fabric of the universe, which is not God, it is math.

Tell me, why are they always described as relatively short creatures, with long necks and big heads? This is exactly the way the immediate human imagination will see them. No. They have all kinds of shapes – they are a function of the star around which they cluster, and some of them can shapeshift.

Is it biologically feasible? Yes. Here is an example that you will understand immediately [Eshed points to the heavy wooden table between us]. It’s a table, right? It’s made of atoms. And if the nucleus of the atom is here on the table – do you know where its electron is? Maybe in Rosh Pina, maybe in the middle of nothing. It’s quantum theory; the material is empty.

Even when we die we do not die, because we are made of molecules and atoms, and we move to another energy. You connect back to the cosmic fabric, to the web, to the connection of consciousnesses. You are consciousness.The consciousnesses will not die. Everything you have accumulated is added. It goes to the same network – and everything you have accumulated in your life, the personality, the total of what you have gone through, it accumulates. Stephen Hawking also realized that our consciousness adds to the fabric of the universe. We are building blocks. Stepping stones.

Shorpy

SHORPY 8d09741u.preview
SHORPY 8d09741u.preview
SHORPY 8d09662u.preview
SHORPY 8d09662u.preview
SHORPY 8d09543a.preview
SHORPY 8d09543a.preview
SHORPY 8d09504a.preview
SHORPY 8d09504a.preview
SHORPY 8d09361a1.preview
SHORPY 8d09361a1.preview
SHORPY 8d09350u.preview
SHORPY 8d09350u.preview
SHORPY 8d09338a.preview
SHORPY 8d09338a.preview
SHORPY 8d09325u.preview
SHORPY 8d09325u.preview
SHORPY 8d09182u.preview
SHORPY 8d09182u.preview
SHORPY 8d08931a.preview
SHORPY 8d08931a.preview
SHORPY 8d08928a.preview
SHORPY 8d08928a.preview
SHORPY 8d08925a.preview
SHORPY 8d08925a.preview
SHORPY 8d08924a.preview
SHORPY 8d08924a.preview
SHORPY 8d08921a.preview
SHORPY 8d08921a.preview
SHORPY 8d08917a.preview
SHORPY 8d08917a.preview
SHORPY 8d08653u.preview
SHORPY 8d08653u.preview
SHORPY 8d08629u1.preview
SHORPY 8d08629u1.preview
SHORPY 8d08613a.preview
SHORPY 8d08613a.preview
SHORPY 8d08568u.preview
SHORPY 8d08568u.preview
SHORPY 8d08444u.preview
SHORPY 8d08444u.preview
SHORPY 8d08345u.preview
SHORPY 8d08345u.preview
SHORPY 8d08251a.preview
SHORPY 8d08251a.preview
SHORPY 8d08220u.preview
SHORPY 8d08220u.preview
SHORPY 8c21278a.preview
SHORPY 8c21278a.preview
SHORPY 5a18087u.preview
SHORPY 5a18087u.preview
SHORPY 4a55259a.preview
SHORPY 4a55259a.preview
SHORPY 4a24067a.preview
SHORPY 4a24067a.preview
SHORPY 4a24063a.preview
SHORPY 4a24063a.preview
xmas 1954 Grandmother.preview
xmas 1954 Grandmother.preview
SHORPY IMG017A 0.preview
SHORPY IMG017A 0.preview
SHORPY 40263a.preview
SHORPY 40263a.preview
SHORPY 27777u.preview
SHORPY 27777u.preview
SHORPY 15356u.preview
SHORPY 15356u.preview
SHORPY 1368.preview
SHORPY 1368.preview
SHORPY 8d44981a.preview
SHORPY 8d44981a.preview
SHORPY 8d22849a.preview
SHORPY 8d22849a.preview
SHORPY 8d22535a.preview
SHORPY 8d22535a.preview
SHORPY 8d10123u.preview
SHORPY 8d10123u.preview
SHORPY 8d09775a.preview
SHORPY 8d09775a.preview
SHORPY 8d09773a.preview
SHORPY 8d09773a.preview
SHORPY 8d09759u.preview
SHORPY 8d09759u.preview
SHORPY 8d09747a.preview
SHORPY 8d09747a.preview

Fourth Time The Pentagon Is Faking The Books For Ukraine

For a fourth time the Pentagon is ‘finding money’ outside of the budget that can be spend on Ukraine.

I had previously noticed three occasions in which the Pentagon, on order of the Biden administration, used some  or ‘accounting error’ gimmicks to ‘find’ more money for Ukraine.

Pentagon Again Applies Budget Lies To Deliver More Weapons To Ukraine –  Jul 26 2024, MoA

The piece referred to three relevant news reports:

Exclusive: Pentagon accounting error overvalued Ukraine weapons aid by $3 billion – May 19 2023, Reuters

Pentagon accounting error provides extra $6.2 billion for Ukraine military aid – June 20 2023, AP

Pentagon finds another $2 billion of accounting errors for Ukraine aid – July 14 2024, Reuters

From the last link:

The Pentagon has found $2 billion worth of additional errors in its calculations for ammunition, missiles and other equipment sent to Ukraine, increasing the improperly valued material to a total of $8.2 billion, a U.S. government report revealed on Thursday.

Here is now another, the fourth, incident of creative budget accounting in favor of money for war in Ukraine:

All reports previously indicated that there was $4.3 billion left in the Presidential Drawdown Authority account, which reimburses the U.S. armed forces for munitions and equipment sent to Ukraine.Turns out, the number is actually $7.1 billion, thanks to some revised accounting the Pentagon has done, DOD officials tell your anchor. That extra $2.8 billion isn’t just found money. The way things work is that the Pentagon calculates how much buying replacement goods for what it sends Ukraine will cost. The number crunchers at the Pentagon ran through the lists and discovered that replacement for some items cost less than anticipated.

The plan is for the administration to spend down that whole $7.1 billion by Trump’s inauguration on Jan. 20 …

Luckily, not all of the money will reach Ukraine:

[Spending the money] is a pretty tall order given the cadence of aid packages being announced roughly every two weeks work between $200 million and $500 million. Those numbers are going to have to go way up, but even then deliveries of that equipment would continue well into the Trump administration, which could turn off the spigot at any time.

I bet that the lower ‘replacements costs’ the Pentagon has found to spend more on Ukraine, will themselves turn out to be ‘accounting errors’. The replacements will – unfortunately they will say – later require much higher outlays than anticipated today.

Creative accounting like this, i.e. faking the books, is a no-no for commercial entity as it might well end with time spent in jail.

I’ll repeat myself:

Any commercial company doing what the Pentagon is doing here would be asking for serious trouble.One wonder if and when Congress will wake up to this.

 

Posted by b at 6:56 UTC | Comments (125)

Setting-Up a “Crash?” Federal Reserve PULLS more than HALF of Credit Available through Bank Term Funding Program (BTFP)

The Federal Reserve “pulled” about thirty billion dollars ($30 Billion) of available credit from its Bank Term Funding Program, and many people are saying this lack of liquidity for banks, is going to cause a “crash..”

Financial Gurus are sounding the alarm on social media:

 

 

In response to the 2023 United States banking crisis in March 2023 involving multiple failures of American banks, in 2023 the United States government took extraordinary measures to mitigate fallout across the banking sector.

On March 12, the Federal Reserve created the Bank Term Funding Program (BTFP), an emergency lending program providing loans of up to one year in length to banks, savings associations, credit unions, and other eligible depository institutions that pledge U.S. Treasuries, agency debt and mortgage-backed securities, and other qualifying assets as collateral.

The “Bank Term Funding Program” was designed to provide liquidity to financial institutions, following the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank and other bank failures. It was also created to reduce the risks associated with unrealized losses in the U.S. banking system, which totaled over $600 billion at the time of the program’s launch.

Funded through the Deposit Insurance Fund, the program offers loans of up to one year to eligible borrowers who pledge as collateral certain types of securities including U.S. Treasuries, agency debt, and mortgage-backed securities.

Financial Gurus are saying that the federal reserve bank, “pulled” over half of the available credit in the Bank Term Funding Program and this, they say,  will have the effect of putting massive stress on banks.

According to these financial people, SOME banks won’t be able to cover cash withdrawals.   This is NOT because the banks don’t have the funds, but because the bank’s funds are locked-up in things like Treasury Notes.  Little solace to a depositor who needs cash, now, or companies that need cash for things like payroll or inventory.

Some of these financial gurus are pointing out the very strange TIMING of the federal reserve’s move:  The days AFTER the November Election.   “It’s almost as if they timed this, so that if the “wrong” candidate won the election, they could pull the rug out from the entire economy” said one financial guy.

 

 

Other financial observers say that Federal Reserve Chairman, Jerome Powell, “handed Trump a ticking time bomb”:

 

 

If bank’s money is tied-up in Treasury Notes for a fixed term, and the federal reserve has now pulled credit from the Bank Term Funding Program, then how will banks meet their cash needs if the federal reserve won’t give them the credit to get the cash from them?   Answer: They won’t.

One rather blunt observer said “This whole thing is coming down. Soon. The fall guy is in place and setting up the scene. He is lining up the patsies and puffing up the patriot crowd. You ain’t getting no Vaseline when this one goes in.

Richard Wolff: The End of the US Empire and the Denial of the US, and the Rise of China and BRICS

Harsh, but needs to be heard.

China Urged To End Successful Policies

In a variant of the Sowing Doubt About China – But At What Cost? propaganda scheme, the New York Times makes the (somewhat racist) claim that China lacks the capability to turn talent into innovation:

What DeepSeek’s Success Says About China’s Ability to Nurture Talent (archived) – New York Times, Feb 10 2025

The subtitle reveals the core thesis:

China produces a vast number of STEM graduates, but it hasn’t been known for innovation. Cultural and political factors may help explain why.

In a globalized world the innovation ability of a country can be measured by the number of global patents it files.

The World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) provides data on these.


bigger
China, which the NYT says is not known for innovation, is by far leading the pack.

One might argue that China, with four times the population of the United States, should have innovated even more than that. But seen under this aspect the U.S. is also far from the top.

Per million inhabitants China filed 1.2 patents per year while the United States filed 1.5. But the real leaders here are South Korea with 5.5 patents per year per million people followed by Japan with 3.3/y/million.

Real world numbers are not sufficient to support the NYT‘s central thesis. That is why it barely mentions some. Its argument comes down to a political one:

Pavel Durov, the founder of the messaging platform Telegram, said last month that fierce competition in Chinese schools had fueled the country’s successes in artificial intelligence. “If the U.S. doesn’t reform its education system, it risks ceding tech leadership to China,” he wrote online.The reality is more complicated. Yes, China has invested heavily in education, especially in science and technology, which has helped nurture a significant pool of talent, key to its ambition of becoming a world leader in A.I. by 2025.

But outside of the classroom, those graduates must also contend with obstacles that include a grinding corporate culture and the political whims of the ruling Communist Party. Under its current top leader, Xi Jinping, the party has emphasized control, rather than economic growth, and has been willing to crack down on tech firms it deems too influential.

If that is indeed so why is it supposed to be bad?

Is it really healthy for a country to have Apple, Nvidia, Microsoft, Amazon and Alphabet (Google) leading in Market Cap? The author fails to follow that question.

She instead misleads about the alleged crack-down:

Beijing has blessed the A.I. sector — for now. But in 2020, after deciding that it had too little control over major companies like Alibaba, it launched a sweeping, yearslong crackdown on the Chinese tech industry.

The crack-down against Alibaba owner Jack Ma came when he tried to expand Alibaba into the so called fin-tech business.

Juggling with credit and various derivatives thereof is a part of the economy that is better to be kept under control. The 2008 mortgage credit crisis and the following government bailout of private banks have taught as much. Pouring money and talent into a sector that is not productive and carries high risk is not in any societies’ best interest.

In an aside the NYT author comes near to acknowledging that:

(DeepSeek’s founder, Liang Wenfeng, pivoted to A.I. from his previous focus on speculative trading, in part because of a separate government crackdown there.)

How can one conclude from there that China still has to liberalize?

But the best way for China to capitalize on its well-educated, ambitious A.I. work force may be for the government to get out of the way.

China’s government planning and control over education and its economy has led to its astonishing rise.

Lacking the abundance of capital which OpenAI and other U.S. companies are spending on their attempts to monopolize their fields, DeepSeek had to innovate. It did so and has beaten its competition.

How less government intervention would have led to a better performance than China has shown is difficult to argue. The NYT for one fails at it.

Posted by b on February 10, 2025 at 10:51 UTC | Permalink

A Work in Progress

Submitted into Contest #150 in response to: Write a story where an algorithm plays an important role. view prompt

Beth Jackson

“Nine, eight, five, three, three…”He reads the numbers, and my face burns. I stand at the edge of the hallway, somewhere by the swinging doors, and posters advocating Girls in Science. A group of teenage boys loiter by the pinboard.The first tests results are out. The scores printed next to the ID numbers. And there’s unrest amongst the troops.“Is it you, Troy?”“James?”“No, he didn’t finish.”“Cody? Surely, it’s not you?”The boys mill by the pinboard, accusations flying, suspicions looming, ID cards waving, intent on deciphering the owner of the top score.I lean against the wall. Invisible. Dismissed.Introductory physics at university. I heft my bag onto my shoulder and push through the swinging doors. It’s quite the introduction to patriarchy.I need an algorithm to cope.#I swing open the door to the toilet and sit. The final course results will be posted today. An entire semester at university.Survived. Endured.

 

I reach for the toilet paper and smile. The triangular piece I left folded yesterday is gone. Someone has used this stall. Someone like me.

 

A woman.

 

I pull off the square of toilet paper and tuck it into my pocket, a reminder I am not alone.

 

I step into the corridor, and the boys are by the pinboard. The scores are out.

 

“Nine, eight, five, three, three…”

 

I lean against the wall and smile.

 

“James?”

 

“Show me your card, Ben. It has to be you.”

 

“What about Troy?”

 

“No, it’s not him. I checked last time.”

 

The boys scramble, a thronging mass of egos, desperate to know who has bested them.

 

I push off the wall, and my shoes squeak on the lino. Acne ridden faces turn. Silence falls.

 

The boys shoot glances at each other, unsure of how to interact with me, even after a semester together. Several of the leaders shuffle closer, and I turn for the door.

 

“It’s you?” The boldest one asks, his voice a mix of disbelief and self-righteous horror. Beaten by a girl. At Physics. Imagine.

 

I pause. And shrug.

 

The boys erupt. Leaping and hollering, talking all at once. Some are thrilled to have found the owner of the ID number.

 

But some are not.

 

The boldest one steps forward. “You’ve been getting the top score?” he asks. “You?”

 

I nod.

 

“Bloody hell. Who did you sleep with to get that?”

 

My face burns. No one asked that of Troy when he got the top score in the mid-terms.

 

I think of the hours I’ve spent in the library, alone with my dogeared table of integrals, scribbling endless proofs, solving equations, finding eigenvectors, calculating eigenvalues. Again. And again. And again.

 

I want to make a comment about what he can do with his genitalia to further his education. But I don’t.

 

I touch the folded square of toilet paper in my pocket. I know the first step of the algorithm.

 

#

 

“Lena, a word, please.”

 

Professor Archibald stands at the front of the lecture theatre, his bald head glinting in the artificial light and his bow tie at odds with his socks and roman sandals.

 

He smiles. He’s harmless.

 

I walk down the stairs, my boots clomping on the wooden floor and the boys pushing past as they head for the door.

 

The professor waits until they’re gone before he speaks. “Lena, I have an opportunity I’d like you to consider.”

 

I wipe my palms on my jeans and nod.

 

“What are you doing next year?” he asks.

 

“I’m going to tcol,” I say.

 

My face feels hot. So far, I’ve managed to avoid this conversation. Largely because no one has asked.

 

He stares at me, silent, his eyebrows inching closer together.

 

“Teachers’ training.” I clarify.

 

His mouth forms a tiny circle and a hiss escapes. Clearly, this is not the answer he’s expecting.

 

He stutters back into life and coughs. “But, postgrad?”

 

I shake my head. “No.”

 

“Well, if that’s your decision.”

 

I nod. It is.

 

“I can’t say I don’t think it’s a great shame, Lena,” he says.

 

I stifle a smile at the double negative. My classmates hid their emotions behind complicated syntax and inflated vocabulary, too.

 

“Perhaps you’ll hear me out, anyway.” He pulls a handkerchief out of his breast pocket and mops his brow. “There’s a spot in a research team that would be perfect for you, if you were looking to do your masters.”

 

My chest tightens, and I run my finger over the tatty square of toilet paper in my pocket.

 

“What’s the project?” I ask.

 

“Atom trapping. We’re hoping to make a Bose-Einstein condensate.”

 

I stare at him. It’s an ambitious project.

 

“I’d be your supervisor,” he says.

 

I look at my feet, my face burning. It’s a big compliment. A world away from tcol. He coughs again, and I sense some unpleasant news coming.

 

“We’ve split the project into optics and theoretical. You’d be part of the optics team, dealing with the laser.”

 

His words are so unexpected, I gasp.

 

He ignores my reaction, or doesn’t notice, and continues. “Obviously, you’d have access to all the data for your thesis.”

 

I shake my head, finding my voice. “I haven’t done optics since first year.”

 

He tucks his handkerchief into his pocket. “It’s the nature of funding. We had two places to offer but had to split them this way.”

 

Two places.

 

A trickle of sweat runs down my back. “Wouldn’t I be better suited to the theoretical team? The entire focus of my degree is theoretical physics. Quantum mechanics.”

 

It makes no sense. I’d hardly be able to turn on the laser, let alone add a significant contribution to the research.

 

“Troy’s accepted a place on the theoretical team with Doctor Austin. We’d really like you on the optics team,” Professor Archibald says.

 

I stagger backwards, the name assaulting. Troy. On the theoretical team. Troy from my class, who worked hard and was ranked second in our year.

 

To me.

 

Why didn’t he get offloaded into optics?

 

And then it dawns on me. Theoretical has Doctor Austin, the token woman on the team. Obligation fulfilled.

 

“You need a female on the optics team,” I say, my voice cracking.

 

Professor Archibald shuffles. The emotional female, a rare creature in the bowels of the physics building.

 

“We’re offering you a place because your grades are outstanding, Lena.”

 

“But it’s Troy on the theoretical team.”

 

“Well, yes, having you in optics would balance our numbers, so to speak. In practice, it makes little difference. We’re all part of the same team.”

 

But I’m not part of the same team, am I?

 

I’m torn. It’s a great opportunity, and I want to accept. But I also want to be more than a token woman. I take my hand out of my pocket and wipe my forehead. The square of toilet paper falls onto the floor.

 

I’m doing this for her. For me.

 

I heft my bag onto my shoulder. “Thank you for the opportunity. But I decline,” I say.

 

I clomp up the stairs and add another step to the algorithm.

 

#

 

“Kia ora, team, books out and sitting down, thanks.”

 

I stare at my class and try not to sigh with relief when they obey.

 

My heels click on the lino, ringing with an authority at odds with my churning stomach.

 

It’s my first day on the job. I hope I survive.

 

“I’m Miss Waters,” I say, pleased my voice isn’t shaking too audibly. “Your physics teacher this year.”

 

“What would you know about physics?” A boy in the back row calls out, his lip curling in a smirk.

 

I fold my arms and look over the sea of faces. They’re on the edge of adolescence, about to tumble into adulthood. Mostly boys, but the girls are holding their own.

 

“What would I know about physics?” I ask.

 

The class falls silent. Still. The gauntlet thrown. Challenge accepted.

 

I run through my choices in this moment. Do I prove myself, challenge him to an intellectual duel, whipping out Schrodinger’s time independent equation and painstakingly solving it on the board?

 

Two girls in the front row sit with their books open and pens poised. No, I’m going to nip this patriarchy in its infancy.

 

I walk towards the boy in the back, his name is printed on his pencil case. Benny. My heels ring with authority and I lift my chin.

 

I have endured the solitude of being a woman in a man’s world. And I have developed an algorithm to combat the patriarchy.

 

It’s a work in progress, I’m still learning, but I apply my algorithm now. I raise my head, look Benny in the eye. And smile.

 

Warmly.

 

I’m rising above it. Proving my worth, measuring my intellectual dick, that’s a man’s game. And I’m not playing.

 

I know my truth. I am worthy.

 

And so, I’m simply going to shine.

 

“I know enough, Benny. Now, sit down,” I say. “We’ve both got a lot of learning to do.”

Texas Woman Sets Record for Donating Almost 700 Gallons of Breastmilk

main qimg d6945bba448f7e5bf36cb0fde72060fa
main qimg d6945bba448f7e5bf36cb0fde72060fa

Courtesy of Alyse Ogletree

An extraordinary woman from Texas has claimed a Guinness World Record thanks to her generous heart, and a little help from some other organs.

Alyse Ogletree has set the world record for the most amount of breastmilk donated by a single person—2,645.58 liters—or just about 700 gallons.

It was a record she had previously broken in 2014 following the birth of her son Kyle in 2010. She was told that she could donate the extra amount of milk she was producing to women who wanted to breastfeed their infants but were struggling.

The suggestion was made when the nurses observed how much excess breastmilk Alyse was producing. She was more than happy to donate, and admitted in an interview with Guinness that donating and giving are some of the most important parts of her life.

“I have a big heart, [but] at the end of the day, I’m not made of money and I can’t give away money to good causes over and over because I have a family to support,” Ogletree said. But “donating milk was a way I could give back”.

“I was overproducing and throwing away milk, unaware overproduction was unique and other mothers struggled,” she remembered. “Our first child, Kyle, was in the hospital, and I was filling the nurses’ freezer. A nurse asked if I was donating, which I didn’t know was possible.”

By the time Kyle was finished nursing (and a fair bit after) she had donated 414 gallons (1,569.79) to Mothers’ Milk Bank of North Texas. She would take up the challenge again after the birth of her two younger sons Kage (12) and Kory (7) such that by the time she finished building her family, she had donated an additional 528 gallons (2,000 liters) to another milk bank—Tiny Treasures—as well as to close friends in need, though these were not counted towards the Guinness World Record.

The Mother’s Milk Bank of North Texas told Ogletree that every liter of milk can feed 11 premature babies, which by her math means that her milk has fed 350,000 infants across Texas if it were all to be used.

Shaina Stanks, the milk bank’s director, said they were “shocked and astonished” by her donation of “an incomprehensible amount of surplus breastmilk to fragile infants.”

“Her life-saving efforts are an undeniable testament to her extraordinary generosity and compassion,” Stanks’ statement added.

The Guardian reports that doctors aren’t really sure why her body seems to be such a natural latteria, but Ogletree stresses her well-balanced, nutrient-rich diet and proper hydration.

Texas Woman Sets Record for Donating Almost 700 Gallons of Breastmilk

Honey Mustard Pork Tenderloin

11202bbb8a352316909c3d41198d026c
11202bbb8a352316909c3d41198d026c

Ingredients

Pork

  • 1 pound pork tenderloin

Glaze

  • 1/4 cup honey
  • 2 tablespoons brown sugar
  • 2 tablespoons cider vinegar
  • 1 tablespoons mustard
  • 1/4 teaspoon each salt and pepper

Instructions

  1. Place pork on a greased rack in a baking pan lined with foil.
  2. Combine glaze ingredients in a bowl, set aside 3 tablespoons glaze. Spoon remaining glaze over pork.
  3. Bake uncovered at 400 degrees F for 28 minutes or until done, basting occasionally with reserved glaze.
  4. Let stand for 5 minutes before slicing.

The return of the United States to manufacturing is a social structural issue and also a philosophical question.

First of all, can it be achieved? The conclusion is of course it can. After all, if the Germans who were reduced to ruins by the artillery fire of World War II could do it, Americans can do it too.

Secondly, how should it be done? In modern high-end manufacturing, there are almost few workers needed.

In China, there are many factories called “lights-out factories”. The entire factory has no workers. The machines on the entire production line are continuously manufacturing products in the roar in the dark.

Now, comes the most crucial question.

See this car?

A company has put thousands of driverless taxis in Wuhan. Within a month, the income of Wuhan taxi drivers was halved. Taxi practitioners protested.

Yes. The problem is here. New productivity will destroy the original social system structure. How can ordinary people who are harmed by technological upgrades obtain compensation?

Can American society accept such social changes? This is the most crucial thing. Some of the huge unemployment problems China is facing now are closely related to this industrial upgrade. We have investigated many companies or factories. Under the condition of reduced staff, they have produced more products and obtained better profits. But these profits have nothing to do with ordinary people except for the bosses of the companies.

Now, the industrial products of only one country, China, can supply the whole world and there is still overcapacity. If 350 million Americans join this competition to manufacture goods again. Then there will be no market in the world that can digest these industrial products.

The solution of the United States and Europe to overproduction is to meet the scarcity of commodities through periodic wars. This is reflected in World War I, World War II, and including the current “US-China trade war”. Through wars, scarcity is artificially created, and excess profits are firmly controlled.

Now the solution proposed by the Chinese is to make more people in the world rich through the Belt and Road Initiative and use time to exchange for the pressure of overproduction. The Belt and Road Initiative is equivalent to an upgraded version of the Marshall Plan. Only when Africans, South Asians, Middle Easterners, and South Americans live a better life will they have the ability to consume more industrial products.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

On October 26, 2024, I replied to Rob Jamieson. The benefit of the “Belt and Road Initiative” for Chinese people is that due to the expansion of the “demand population”, industrial products produced in China have a lower price due to the advantage of scale, which allows all Chinese people to enjoy cheaper industrial products. The price of Toyota Corolla in the United States is 22,050 US dollars, which is about 156,000 yuan. However, according to the current industrial production cost in China, the correct selling price of Corolla should be between 5,000 and 6,000 US dollars. Because BYD’s electric vehicle of the same level, which has better quality and handling than Toyota Corolla, is only close to 10,000 US dollars. Why do ordinary American families need to pay an extra 4,000 US dollars to buy a car that is inferior to BYD in both driving experience and quality? This feeling is equivalent to you paying 180% more for a product. You will definitely shout loudly that you have been cheated. You should know that when your country is experiencing inflation and soaring prices, China is in deflation. All product manufacturers want to obtain cash flow by dumping products. And other countries in the world, even the United States, cannot compress the production cost of Toyota Corolla within this range. This is one of the reasons why the sales of Volkswagen and Toyota in China are gradually declining.

If Africans, South Asians, and Americans all become wealthy… they will inevitably build new roads and will also inevitably buy cars produced in China. When they have more vehicles, the business of Chinese automobile factories will be better.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

When your customers don’t have money to spend with you, your business can’t be better. When a small or medium-sized country may get rich overnight through “robbery”, “deception” and “theft”. But for a country like China with 1.4 billion people, even if it robs the wealth of the whole world, in the end it still can’t make the lives of every ordinary Chinese person much better. This is like in a fairy tale. If a wolf kills all the sheep in the community, then the wolf’s fate is to starve to death. This is destined that the only choice for Chinese people is to continuously produce, trade, innovate, produce, and trade… This cycle. Only in this way can we barely maintain making the lives of 1.4 billion people better.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Dear Donald McLellan, I have investigated numerous factories and various industries in China. The crisis that the Chinese people are currently facing is a structural contradiction resulting from highly intelligent and large – scale manufacturing. Take an example that we have investigated. At one of the world’s largest container ports, there are no drivers. All the transfer work of containers at the port is completed by AI – powered robots. Moreover, the transfer vehicles are also electric vehicles. You may wonder where those dockworkers have gone. The answer is that they have become “taxi drivers”, “long – distance truck drivers”, or “food delivery workers”. However, now many large companies have launched unmanned taxis, unmanned trucks, and even unmanned drones for food delivery. Many technologies are already in the test phase before large – scale deployment. Many “food delivery workers” in China have received higher education. They can even solve partial differential equations. They work more than 12 hours a day to deliver food just to support their families. Another example is the solar photovoltaic industry. The cost of solar photovoltaic modules produced in China is approximately 0.58 – 0.6 RMB per watt, and the price of exports to Europe is around 0.62 RMB per watt. Yes, including tariffs, this is dumping. Big capital groups are now dumping products all over the world in order to maintain cash flow and better stock prices. Germans even use solar panels purchased from China as road guardrails. The First Solar company in the United States would be torn to pieces by the manufacturing capabilities of Chinese enterprises immediately if it weren’t for the tariff barrier. Yes, many people will say: innovation is needed. But the physical limit is right here. At most, only 27% of the energy of each watt of sunlight can be converted into electrical energy.

Third, it’s not that the United States cannot fully return to manufacturing. The real problem lies in the fact that according to data from 2023, there are approximately 3.05 million truck drivers in the United States. This includes 2.05 million heavy truck and semi-trailer truck drivers, as well as 1 million light truck (such as delivery trucks and vans) drivers. If a company deploys 3.05 million driverless trucks. What should these 3.05 million truck drivers and their 3.05 million families do?

China’s large-scale industrial manufacturing capacity is constantly influencing the world. Even in the current Russia-Ukraine war, if the Chinese government lifts export controls on drones, Russians/NATO can immediately obtain various lethal drones at a very low cost. In just one city in China, the production of lethal drones can be maintained at a production rate of one million drones per day. But the price humans pay is that there are at least nearly 100,000 or more deaths every day.

If the United States returns to manufacturing, where are their comparative advantages in industrial manufacturing? Even if the United States fully returns to manufacturing, can this make every ordinary American family live a happier life?

I have investigated countless enterprises and interviewed countless government officials who are attempting to revitalize manufacturing. As far as I know, currently, not to mention in Europe, the United States, Southeast Asia, or even in India or Japan, there are not enough mold technicians, let alone sufficient cheap electricity to support industrial production. Any country that lacks these two necessary conditions cannot implement large-scale manufacturing. Moreover, what is the purpose of the United States’ comprehensive return to manufacturing? Is it to enable all ordinary American families to live a happier life? Or is it to “develop manufacturing” for the sake of “the return of manufacturing”? This is a crucial question.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Reply to Rob again.

I have investigated the industrial production costs of many industries in China. Even when compared with Southeast Asian countries or South Asian countries known for their cheap labor costs, China’s industrial production costs are still the “lowest” relative to other countries. Let’s take the textile industry as an example. In fact, the cost of textiles manually produced by female workers in Bangladesh is not cheaper than that produced by China’s “lights – out factories”. In the production of a commodity, the labor cost only accounts for one – fifth or even less. The others are logistics, raw materials, energy, and taxes. China’s industrial manufacturing is very likely the bottom line of human “large – scale” industrial manufacturing. Even so, the vast majority of Chinese people are still “poor”. There are still 600 million people with an annual income of less than 1,000 RMB per capita. This is a “dilemma” in the history of human development. When you produce more goods, you are still “poor”. And the people on the consumption side don’t have a better life either. Where is the core reason for this problem?

100% due to USA. It has nothing to do with Taiwan or China. USA decided to move an away from strategic ambiguity to strategic flirting with Taiwan to destabilised China. This is very sinister and foolish as it is seen as trouble making and war mongering! They are certainly helped by a China that prefers patience and long term thinking. It managed to keep the peace although flirting with another man’s spouse do disrupt their family! Imagine China supplying arms and promising protection from USA to say Hawaii or Texas. How would USA feels about an action like this from China!

The whole world can see it is the US war mongering and in no small way it cause the shift away from relying and pandering with the US by the global majority. If the US had not been fishing in trouble waters, by now Taiwan issued would have been fully resolved! No one is fooled like this questioner about why the Taiwan problems remain! Certainly that don’t mean well for the reputation of the USA. We are no fools even if the western media set narratives to demonised China!

Just think about this The US stole California and Texas from Mexico in less than a century as a nation. China kept all its neighbours as neighbours after 3000 in spite from it humongous power and wealth! The world knows the problem is the US not the Taiwanese! Or the Chinese, I know how Taiwanese feels because I am of the same ancestry as Taiwanese, A southern Fuchien ancestry who prefer peaceful coexistence with China as its motherland. We are not fools like Ukrainians that lead to 800 thousand deaths and injuries and total destruction of their land due to US and UK war mongering actions!

“Many Underestimate Beijing”: China is Ready for a Trade War with the US and Has Already Selected a Number of Effective Measures

China has developed powerful measures to deal with a new round of trade tensions with the US if newly elected President Donald Trump tries to reignite the economic war between the world’s largest economies, the Financial Times reports.Since Trump’s surprise election victory in 2016, China has faced a wave of economic restrictions, including higher tariffs, tighter controls on foreign investment and sanctions on Chinese companies. These measures have posed a serious challenge for Beijing, especially given the country’s worsening economic situation. But over the past eight years, China has adapted, passing laws that allow it to restrict foreign companies’ access to the Chinese market, impose its own sanctions and manipulate critical supply chains, especially with the US.

While Joe Biden has maintained many of the Trump administration’s restrictions, Trump himself has set an even tougher course and has already begun assembling a team to support increased pressure on China.

Beijing now has new legal tools at its disposal, such as the Foreign Sanctions Act, which allows it to respond to restrictions imposed by other countries, and the “Unreliable Entity List,” a list of foreign companies whose actions could be seen as a threat to China’s national interests. The expanded export control rules allow China to use its dominant position in the supply of rare earth metals and lithium, resources critical to advanced technology , to great effect.Experts say many are underestimating the potential impact of China’s measures. Andrew Gilholm, head of China at consultancy Control Risks, points out a number of emblematic sanctions: for example, Beijing has banned its companies from supplying key components to U.S. drone maker Skydio, which in turn supplies the Ukrainian armed forces. Another example is the threat of blacklisting PVH, the owner of Calvin Klein and Tommy Hilfiger, which could cut off its access to the huge Chinese market

.China is also taking steps to strengthen its own technology and resource supply chains to reduce its dependence on American companies, and is expanding cooperation with countries that are more neutral in their relations with Washington. However, the threat of comprehensive tariffs on Chinese imports, which could reach 60%, remains a real risk for Beijing, especially given the slowing economy, declining consumer and business confidence, and high youth unemployment.

If the US is perceived as an unreliable trading partner, it could push other major economies to strengthen ties with China in search of stable and profitable export markets, creating a new balance of power in global trade.

Definitely

The US have absolutely no major edge against either China or Russia today

main qimg 37f8f116d9d84e1d066a1c6ac4e6858e
main qimg 37f8f116d9d84e1d066a1c6ac4e6858e

The Small Technological edge that US has is compensated by a Huge Production advantage that China has & by a massive mobilization ability

This ain’t the 1990s when the US dominated and its technology was 4–5 generations ahead of anything the East had

Now the difference is maximum 1-1 1/2 generations in a few areas like

A. Early warning

B. Satellite Navigation & Monitoring

C. Advanced Radar

D. Stealth

Yet they are AHEAD in a few areas like

A. Ground Radar

B. Layered Air Defense

C. Hypersonic Missiles

D. Electronic Warfare & EMP enabled signals jamming

Plus the Chinese evolve at 3 times the speed the US do

For instance – a US Fighter Aircraft goes into commercial manufacturing after 8 years on an average after the design modification versus 3 1/2 years for a Chinese Fighter Aircraft

Why China Is LAUGHING At Trump’s Tariff Plan To Revive US Factories

(Visited 181 times, 1 visits today)
5 1 vote
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x