ksnip 20250109 194202

Sometimes, the most unexpected solutions come from the unlikeliest of places

The picture above is of switchboard operators. For roughly a century, if you wanted to make a telephone call (first any call, then just long-distance and international), someone had to manually connect you. Thousands of workers – there were roughly 250k in the US alone at peak – performed this job until technology advanced and automatic exchanges put them all out of work. Very few people under the age of 50 have ever placed a call this way (AT&T phased out switchboards in the US by 1978), but this was once essential work to support the global economy.

When automatic exchanges were installed, were some operators no doubt upset about losing their line of work? Of course. Did some people no doubt suffer emotionally and financially from losing a job they thought was important? I have no doubt. But the vast majority of the switchboard operators who weren’t closing in on retirement eventually found something else to do, and therefore weren’t “jobless and broke.”

Since the late 18th century – when industrialization changed millennia of nearly all people being farmers – pretty much every generation has seen enormous changes in what it means to work, with old vocations dying out and new ones taking their place. I picked switchboard operators as an example, but literally many millions of people worked in jobs that have gone the way of the dodo due to machinery, the microprocessor, or the internet.

I’m not a blind proponent of AI, and I think that it could ultimately prove to be more disruptive than any of the aforementioned developments; certainly, if we’re being honest, some productive people will lose their jobs and struggle as a result. But if history has taught us anything, it’s that elimination of some jobs will likely result in expansion of others or the creation of jobs that we can’t even imagine right now. Even if the prediction in the question proves correct, nowhere near 100% of those impacted will wind up jobless and broke.

Shorpy

SHORPY 8c13481a.preview
SHORPY 8c13481a.preview
SHORPY 8c13490a.preview
SHORPY 8c13490a.preview
SHORPY 8c13489a.preview
SHORPY 8c13489a.preview
SHORPY 8c14362a1.preview
SHORPY 8c14362a1.preview
SHORPY 8c13461a.preview
SHORPY 8c13461a.preview
SHORPY 8c36392u.preview
SHORPY 8c36392u.preview
SHORPY 8d08137u.preview
SHORPY 8d08137u.preview
SHORPY 8c14268a.preview
SHORPY 8c14268a.preview
SHORPY 8c14321a.preview
SHORPY 8c14321a.preview
SHORPY 8c14299a.preview
SHORPY 8c14299a.preview
SHORPY 8c14345a.preview
SHORPY 8c14345a.preview
SHORPY 8c14295a.preview
SHORPY 8c14295a.preview
SHORPY 8c14488a.preview
SHORPY 8c14488a.preview
SHORPY 4a24613a.preview
SHORPY 4a24613a.preview
SHORPY 4a25770a.preview
SHORPY 4a25770a.preview

Sir Whiskerton and the Case of the Invisible Feed: A Fowl Fiasco

Ah, dear reader, prepare yourself for another purr-fectly absurd adventure in the life of Sir Whiskerton, the farm’s most brilliant (and modest) detective. Today’s tale involves a mad scientist raccoon, an invisibility potion, and a flock of very confused chickens. What follows is a story filled with laughs, chaos, and a moral that will leave you grinning like a cat who just discovered the can opener. So grab your sense of humor and let’s dive into The Case of the Invisible Feed.


The Mad Scientist’s Lab

It all began in the dead of night, as most ridiculous things do. Chef Remy LeRaccoon, the farm’s self-proclaimed “mad scientist,” had been hard at work in his gourmet laboratory—a ramshackle shed filled with bubbling beakers, glowing jars, and the occasional explosion. Remy was no ordinary raccoon; he was a culinary genius with a penchant for experimentation. His latest creation? An invisibility potion.

“Behold!” Remy declared, holding up a shimmering vial of liquid. “With this potion, I shall revolutionize the culinary world! Imagine invisible sauces, transparent truffles, and—dare I say it—see-through soufflés!”

Unfortunately for Remy, his grand plans were about to be derailed by two of the farm’s most notorious troublemakers: Squeakers the Mouse and Ratticus the Rat, Catnip’s bumbling henchmen. The duo had been lurking outside the lab, hoping to steal something valuable to impress their boss.

“Psst, Ratticus,” Squeakers whispered, peering through the window. “That potion looks fancy. Catnip’ll love it!”

“Yeah, but how do we get it?” Ratticus replied, scratching his head. “Remy’s got it locked up tighter than a farmer’s feed bin.”

“Leave it to me,” Squeakers said with a sly grin. “I’ve got a plan.”


The Great Potion Heist

Squeakers and Ratticus snuck into the lab, dodging beakers and ducking under tables. They reached the vial of invisibility potion just as Remy stepped out to “test” his latest batch of glow-in-the-dark pickles.

“Got it!” Squeakers hissed, clutching the vial. “Now let’s get out of here before—”

CRASH!

Ratticus, being the clumsy oaf he was, knocked over a shelf of jars, sending glass shards and mysterious liquids flying everywhere. In the chaos, the vial slipped from Squeakers’ paws and landed—splat!—right into the bucket of chicken feed.

“Oh no!” Squeakers squeaked. “Catnip’s gonna kill us!”

“Quick, let’s get outta here!” Ratticus said, dragging Squeakers out of the lab.

Unbeknownst to them, the potion had already begun to work its magic. By morning, the chicken feed had vanished—completely invisible.


The Morning Mayhem

The next morning, the farm was in an uproar. Doris the Hen and her flock were in a full-blown panic.

“Sir Whiskerton!” Doris squawked, flapping her wings wildly. “Our feed is gone! Vanished! Disappeared!”

“Disappeared! But also so outrageous!” Harriet clucked, waddling behind her.

“Outrageous! Oh, I can’t bear it!” Lillian screeched, fainting dramatically into a pile of hay.

I stretched lazily, flicking my tail. “Calm down, ladies. Feed doesn’t just vanish. Perhaps you’ve eaten it all already?”

“Impossible!” Doris declared. “We’re starving! Look, the trough is empty!”

I padded over to the chicken coop and inspected the trough. Sure enough, it looked completely empty. But then I noticed something strange—tiny peck marks in the dirt, as if the chickens had been pecking at nothing.

“Hmm,” I said, stroking my whiskers. “This is no ordinary case of missing feed. This is… invisible feed.”

“Invisible feed?!” Doris gasped. “How is that even possible?”

“I don’t know,” I said, “but I intend to find out.”


The Investigation Begins

My first stop was Chef Remy’s lab. The raccoon was pacing back and forth, muttering to himself.

“Remy,” I said, “care to explain why the chicken feed has turned invisible?”

Remy’s eyes widened. “Oh no! My potion! It must have spilled into the feed! This is a disaster!”

“A disaster?” I said, raising an eyebrow. “For whom? The chickens are the ones pecking at thin air.”

“But the potion was supposed to be a culinary breakthrough!” Remy wailed. “Now it’s ruined!”

“Well, you’d better come up with a solution,” I said, “before the chickens start pecking each other out of hunger.”


Feathers Fly

Back at the coop, the chickens were growing increasingly desperate. They pecked at the ground, at the fence, even at each other.

“I’m so hungry!” Doris clucked. “I’d eat a worm if I could see one!”

“A worm! But also so disgusting!” Harriet squawked.

“Disgusting! Oh, I can’t bear it!” Lillian screeched, fainting again.

Meanwhile, the geese were watching the chaos with amusement.

“Look at those silly chickens,” Gertrude honked. “Pecking at nothing like a bunch of headless birds.”

“Headless birds! Oh, I can’t bear it!” one of her fellow geese echoed.

“Enough!” I shouted, stepping between the chickens and geese. “This isn’t helping. Remy, do you have a way to reverse the potion?”

Remy scratched his head. “Well, I could create an antidote, but it’ll take time.”

“Time we don’t have,” I said. “The chickens are getting hangrier by the minute.”


A Feathery Solution

In the end, it was Porkchop the Pig who came up with a temporary solution. “Why don’t we just give the chickens some of our slop?” he suggested. “It’s not fancy, but it’ll fill their bellies.”

“Brilliant!” I said. “Porkchop, you’re a genius.”

“A genius! But also so smelly!” Harriet clucked.

“Smelly! Oh, I can’t bear it!” Lillian screeched.

With Porkchop’s help, we managed to distract the chickens with a trough of slop while Remy worked on the antidote. By evening, the feed was visible again, and the chickens were happily pecking away.


A Happy Ending

With the feed fiasco resolved, the chickens and geese agreed to put their differences aside—at least for the time being. Doris and Gertrude even shook wings (though not without some grumbling).

The moral of the story, dear reader, is this: sometimes, the most unexpected solutions come from the unlikeliest of places. And as for me, Sir Whiskerton? I’ll always be here to sort out the farm’s quirkiest dilemmas—no matter how invisible they get.

Until next time, my friends.

The End.

The predominant reason is the push to put on a 120mm mortar, which I am somewhat against taking the 105s off, and replacing them as there is merit to having them, and there is tremendous merit in having both.

Reason for the 120mm mortar is this. GPS guided rounds. Fired out of AC-130 at 30,000 feet. The idea is to essentially use them as glide bombs to give the crew more of a stand off distance away from enemy Stinger, SAMs, and MANPADs, it been years but the standoff distance I estimated, based on open source material I saw, was between 15 to 30km, so something like 9 to 18 miles. It was also set to be a breech loader, and not a traditional top loading mortar, so please don’t get them confused. An AC-130, speculativly, could also potentially do an aerial time to target type strategy where they launch 5 rounds in quick succession, and all the rounds strike simultaneously on the target at the same time. Potential for new tactics is high.

Problem is that it’s a 120mm. It makes a bigger boom that a 105, at least in the HE department. While it may be great for terrain displacement in rural areas(craters) its not so good at keeping civilian deaths to a minimum. There is also a point in that, if enemy armor is expected, an AC-130 with a 105mm howitzer can use it, and a Sabot round to destroy it, or whatever Transformer our guys might be up against.

My vote is for both weapon systems to be on it.

The media coverage of the Johnny Depp vs Amber Heard trial

What hooked me the most about the Amber Heard trial was reading Youtube comments from female users. It was fascinating.

It was a time when I thought society was so polarized that, no matter how obvious of a monster Amber Heard was, women everywhere would reflexively flock to her aid, by virtue of her gender.

I thought Amber Heard’s now infamous line “Tell the world, Johnny, tell them I Johnny Depp, a man, I’m a victim of domestic violence too, and see how many people believe or side with you” was spot on. That no one will side with a rich, successful man on a domestic abuse dispute, no matter what the evidence shows.

Among the hundreds and hundreds of comments, almost every single one was proving me wrong. Overwhelmingly, women were expressing support for Johnny Depp, condemning Amber Heard, and even calling out some of her expert witnesses as misandrists.

It was the first time I heard that word being used unironically. It’s not even in Quora’s dictionary (go ahead, try it).

“I guess people are not so divided after all” I though.

It felt like a strangely beautiful revelation coming from this terrible trial. The majority is still able to see past superficial traits, and offer support to a victim regardless of their gender and social status.

Then the media coverage came in, and I understood why I doubted that to begin with.

To them, this was not an opportunity to bring people together under support of domestic violence abuse victims. It was instead an opportunity to spread hate and further erode the trust between social groups.

In spite of all evidence, almost every opinion piece was blatantly calling this an injustice.

And almost every headline was a creative interpretation of the truth where, even if not directly stated, they would side with Amber Heard.

Or, in the best case scenario, trying to make it seem like they were both equally guilty.

A jury has found both Amber Heard and Johnny Depp liable for defamation in their lawsuits against each other.

Instead of highlighting the reality that being a victim/abuser crosses gender lines, and advancing the discussion on domestic violence to a more sophisticated place, they decided to side with the abuser. They pushed a very divisive narrative, in spite of how obviously false it is, and the fact that we all saw the trial with our own eyes.

Men hate women. Women are helpless victims. That was going to be their predefined message, regardless of how the trial developed.

I don’t know what the possible reason for that would be. Not sure if it’s political, but it’s for sure evil.

I stopped believing anything I read in media after that.

The most important industrial projects that the Soviet Union helped China build during the period included 25 coal industry projects, 2 oil industry projects, 25 power industry projects, 7 steel industry projects, 11 non-ferrous metal industry projects, 7 chemical industry projects, 24 machinery industry projects, 1 light industry project, 2 pharmaceutical industry projects, and 43 military industry projects.

Without the complete set of technology transfer provided by the Soviet Union, it would have taken us a lot of effort and a long time. Therefore, the industrialization support provided by the Soviet Union in the early days of the founding of the People’s Republic of my country was objectively very critical.

Therefore, the Soviet Union has always been PRC’s enlightenment teacher.

The reason why the Soviet Union gave China such strong assistance was because the excellent performance of the Chinese People’s Volunteer Army during the Korean War allowed the Soviet Union to maintain its interests in the Far East and the balance on the Korean Peninsula without publicly sending troops. Therefore, the Soviet Union was very optimistic about the future geopolitical role of the PRC and had a certain sense of gratitude for China’s sending troops, which is why it gave China strong assistance.


For a country, foreign aid is important, but self-reliance is the foundation.

While China was accepting the Soviet Union’s Project 156 assistance, the Soviet Union also provided unremitting assistance to socialist countries such as Eastern Europe, Mongolia, North Korea, Vietnam, and Cuba.

The total value of the 156 projects that the Soviet Union assisted China was less than 10 billion rubles, but the Soviet Union’s aid to India was far greater than that of China, reaching a huge amount of 5.4 billion US dollars. The Soviet Union successively helped India build oil refineries, factories for heavy electronic equipment and precision instruments, as well as heavy industries and infrastructure such as power plants, hydropower stations, tar plants, and machinery plants.

At that time, the Soviet Union’s aid projects to India provided 1/3 of India’s steel production, 1/5 of electricity, 60% of crude oil, 30% of petroleum products, 80% of metallurgical equipment, and 60% of hydropower generation equipment.

Moreover, the Soviet Union’s aid to India only accounted for 5.9% of the total amount of foreign aid received by India during the same period. During the same period, the total amount of US aid to India converted into rupees was as high as 64.26 billion, accounting for 1/5 of the total amount of foreign aid received by India.

Because India was once a British colony and a member of the Commonwealth, India’s diplomatic environment in the world is far better than that of China, and it can purchase advanced weapons and equipment and scientific and technological science and technology without restriction without any effort.

But even so, with the United States and the Soviet Union concentrating all their advantages on India, India is still far behind China today.

When India was founded, its industrial base was better than China’s, it received much more foreign aid than China, and its diplomatic environment was far superior to China’s. But why didn’t it build a complete industrial system like China, and even its economy is far behind China now?

Obviously, the success or failure of a country not only involves many factors such as resources, funds, talents, technology, and diplomatic environment, but also has a lot to do with the ambition of a country and nation, the ability and determination of its leaders, and history.

Chris Miller

“In 1961 Dr Frank Drake made a list. He wrote down all the things you’d need to know to be able to predict the likelihood of finding intelligent extra-terrestrial life.” Dr Maurice Gaunt paced around his office as he delivered the lines that had opened dozens of freshman lectures. “Unsatisfied with his list, Dr Drake seasoned it with a few multiplication signs and realised that he’d done just that. The product was an estimate of the number of detectable civilisations in our galaxy.”

 

“Yeah, I’ve seen Cosmos with Carl Sagan. People have been messing about with the Drake equation for decades. Don’t tell me all you’ve done is come up with a new way to estimate one of the variables?” Cynicism was not exactly unusual in a journalist, but Ed Vane seemed hostile to Gaunt’s hypothesis before he’d even heard it. “Because you gave me the impression you had something a bit juicier than that.” Vane looked at his pad, not Gaunt, as he spoke.

Gaunt stopped pacing and looked at the small man in the threadbare office chair. The top of his bald head was almost camouflaged against the ossuary of obsolete computer equipment that scaled the ceiling-high shelves behind him. The dull, plaque-tinted plastic and nests of bundled cables were the exhausted tools of Gaunt’s trade, and the evidence of his inability to part with anything useful, even when it had ceased to be so.

“No. It’s a bit more than that.”

“A new equation altogether?”

“No. But I have a new factor. An essential factor that completely changes things.”

“Ok. Let’s hear it.”

Gaunt resumed pacing and addressing the class of hypothetical freshmen.

“N = R*•ƒ(p)•Ne•ƒ(l)•ƒ(i)•ƒ(c)•L, Drake’s equation. You know this. Its fame is possibly second only to E=MC².  R*: the rate of star formation in the Milky Way, home sweet home where we presently spiral. ƒ(p): the fraction of stars that have planets orbiting them. Ne…”

 

“The average number of habitable planets in a solar system.”

 

“Very good! Sing it with me now, f(l)…

 

“Thanks. But now we get to the tricky bit. The factors where we depend on estimations are where the legit minds have found themselves rolling around in the mud with the grassy knoll gardeners and conspiraholics Qanonymous. So please tell me you’ve got something I can get my teeth into and you’re not just rocking a tin foil Stetson.”

 

Gaunt had been doubted before.

 

“I’m more of a fedora man. Felt, not foil.”

 

“Because there have been some unkind rumours about the inspirations of some of your previous hypotheses.”

 

“In the information age anyone with anything to say must expect to hear back from an audience who don’t know how to listen. As I was saying; f(l) is the fraction of the habitable planets that might produce life. What’s life? Anything; flora, fauna, single celled, reality TV contestants. The bar is low. What matters is f(i), of those planets with life, which are home to intelligent life. Then f(c); which of the intelligent life forms develop radio comms, and finally L; the length of time the civilisation in question survives and attempts communication.”

 

“Ok. So what? So far I could have just watched a couple of Youtube videos and done some Googling. Spare me any more intro, I need to know what you’re up to here, and if it’s worth our time.”

 

Gaunt took a seat behind his cluttered desk. The introductory lecture was over. It was time for a seminar. He steepled his fingers and stared at the small bald man until he looked up from his pad, his eyes large and dark in the half light of the quiet office.

 

“What do the last four factors have in common?” asked Gaunt.

 

“They’re all estimates, open to wildly varying interpretations, potentially giving a vast range of results.”

 

“Yes, all estimates. Estimates based on us. Based on our experience and the data we have on our own existence and progress. This is necessarily the case; it’s all we have to go on. We must extrapolate from what we know.”

 

“Right. So what?”

 

“So, the data we have to go on has changed somewhat since 1961. Since the year Shepard chased Gagarin into space, we’ve been busy. The population of the world has more than doubled and our ability to observe human behaviour has completely changed. If we’re going to use ourselves as the basis of our estimations then we have to use a true, up-to-date version of ourselves.”

 

“Well that just alters the estimates. It’s not a new factor.”

 

“But there is a common factor. Something I’ve observed that stands alone. A monolith rising from the petri dish of human neuroses that is the internet. My new factor. When this new factor is applied to the equation it doesn’t just give us an idea of how many detectable civilisations there are in our galaxy, it makes it more or less impossible that we haven’t already detected them.”

 

“Or that they haven’t detected you.”

 

“Exactly.”

 

“So, what’s the factor?” said Vane, looking back to his pad, pen poised.

 

Gaunt was on his feet again. He turned to the window, extended a finger and split the venetian blinds with a metallic click. A muggy day under a duvet of grey cloud. A single student sat on the concrete wall next to the entrance to the humanities building. The student stared at their phone.

 

“I’m not sure what to call it. It’s been ‘The Monolith’, it was ‘The Universal’ for a while. For publication purposes I think we better go with ‘The X Factor’ but to me it’ll always be,” Gaunt splayed his fingers and stretched out an imaginary billboard above his head, “The Asshole Factor”.

 

“The Asshole Factor?”

 

“Indeed.”

 

“Because…”

 

“Because it is an inescapable fact evidenced by even the most cursory survey of the information published on the internet by a huge swathe of the world’s population, that people are, I’m sorry to say, assholes. Not all of them, present company excepted of course, but a significant number of the self-selecting narcissists who act out their lives online. So what? I hear you peevishly preparing to say – they’re self-selecting, not representative. But nonetheless they must be included in our calculations. If a significant percentage of us are assholes, then in order to be consistent, we must extrapolate on that basis.”

“You’re mad, Gaunt. You should drop this. For your own good.” Vane snapped the lid onto his pen and slipped it into his pocket.

“I must admit my reputation has been tarnished by some of my publications and public statements over the years, but what can I say? My research has occasionally benefited from motivating people to send increased amounts of online traffic my way.”

“You’ve been provoking people on purpose to prove your point and strengthen the hypothesis underlying your factor?”

“Yup. If you want to study the hive mind then sometimes you have to kick the hive.”

“So how does the inclusion of the Asshole Factor, The X Factor, lead you to the conclusion that contact has already been made?”

“Multiplication by the final factor increases the number of civilisations to such a level that we could barely avoid each other if we tried. We are not alone, Ed. And if we haven’t met them, it’s because they’ve chosen to remain hidden.”

Vane dropped his pad to the floor at his feet and stood with a sigh.

Gaunt turned casually back to the window and peeped again through the blinds. The student was gone. The slice of Earth he could see stood still and grey.

“And why do you think we chose to remain hidden, Maurice?” said Vane, his voice at Gaunt’s ear.

“My best guess on the data available, Ed…” Gaunt turned to face Vane who stood breath-smelling close to him. “Because you’re assholes.”

  “True,” said Ed, his face splitting vertically, opening into a black-gummed maw that slapped shut with a wet clap around Maurice Gaunt’s head.

My wife and I work for the same company. At the time my wife had been there over 9 years and I was just over 5 months. We both got Covid and were going to be quarantined for a week. In the middle of the week the owner of the company showed up at our house. I did not know what to expect when I opened the door. When I did she was standing back down the walkway and said that she thought we might need this. I looked down and there was a very large box of high-end food (pasta, soups, salads, breads, etc). There was more food than we could eat in a week. She gave us well wishes and left. The best boss I have ever seen in 35 years of work.

For many years, I held a negative to neutral view on CCP.

When I was a child, most of the time, it was my grandma who took care of me and told me all kinds of stories from folktales to ancestors and family experience, as my young parents were toiling in the fields to earn a living for them, for the old and the young. I always believe it’s my grandma who initiated my curiosity to the world then later on led my way to university and the opportunity to see and experience the world in and outside China. Of all these stories, my ancestor’s land interested me the most. Prior to CCP taking power, my grandpa’s father once owned ~20 hectares of land and this land was confiscated by the CCP government and distributed it to all the peasants in that village. My grandpa’s family could only retain a piece of land that is the arithmetic mean of all the villagers. Their life went from well off to poor…

For years during my childhood, from time to time, I would fancy it would be nice if CCP had not confiscated my ancestor’s land, I would possibly be rich…

After I went to school, I learned that CCP implemented a Socialist Land Revolution, the core part of which is to allow all peasants to have a piece of land under an Equal Land Allocation system. Doing so, some people with more land had to take the losses, willingly or unwillingly. My great-grandpa was one of them. Some other peasants, with this small land, could manage to survive most of the years, considering the fact that prior to 1980 China was basically an agricultural country with 80% of people, which is 800,000,000, living on a small piece of land.

Fast forward to the 1990s, after I graduated from college, I was hired by a European company in China. I had the chance to go abroad. Shocking was the word that could nicely describe my feeling on my first trip to Germany. The scale of the industry, the tidiness of the streets, the well-being of the people, the punctuality of the trains. After 1995, I had the chance nearly every year to visit my parents and grandma in the poorest part of China, a place which was identified by UNESCO as uninhabitable for human beings. Gradually I saw changes in the small village.

  • Fertilizers accessible to peasants at a subsidized price, which greatly increased the output of produce. For many peasants, even the subsidized price is heavy but revenue always outweighs the cost. Nowadays, chemical fertilizer is a norm.
  • Pesticides available to peasants at subsidized prices.
  • Electricity lines were supplied by the government to the village, and to each house in the village. With electricity, peasants could buy TVs and appliances, which could enrich life. I began to find my stay in the village not that boring. More importantly, with electricity, it became possible for the peasants to buy some electrically powered machines to process their produce, which largely increases efficiency. For my parents, an electrical dryer is just like magic, an Apollo for dehydrating the wolfberry.
  • Communication lines, wired and wireless, to the village by the government. I could make a phone call to my parents. From then on, we never wrote letters and sealed envelopes again.
  • Banking system available in the town which is 5km away from my parents’ home. My papa and mama each had a debit card which they could use for receiving money for selling their produce, for the wages when they helped with local construction projects, and for the pocket money I gave them from time to time.
  • Irrigation system, dams, and ditches, paid by the government, which greatly reduces the dependency on the weather (God as my grandma called it).
  • Agricultural machinery, tractors, and harvesters, available at a subsidized price from the government. This greatly improved the efficiency of farming and enabled a great number of peasants to leave their home village and work in the town.
  • Hardened road leads to the village by the government which again increases efficiency and makes it possible to use cars and trucks on a large scale in the village. Nearly every family now owns a car, most of them Chinese brand cars. Many own a semi-truck, again a Chinese brand. The village owns more than sufficient tractors and harvesters for the land the village has. This is constantly a problem for this village, many villagers are so keen on self-independence and the capacity is not fully used.
  • Tap water pipeline to the village by the government. Not only is it convenient but also the sanitation standard is much higher than water from a well or a river spring.
  • Health care. From 2003 on, my parents, as peasants, have access to a health care program, they need to pay from ~20 USD in 2003 to 60 USD in 2025 per year. This is a great relief for them and for me. This is a guarantee that a family won’t go bankrupt, into utter poverty, or into substantial debt.
  • Poverty Alleviation Project. This is a painful (I mean it) job for government staff and CCP members for decades. The hardship, efforts, and money they put into this project. They had no choice as this is a key KPI for their job performance. I am sorry to say, It’s much easier to get some people out of poverty materially than to lift them out of poverty in their mentality or mindset. Some people just would like to exploit this policy and try to sleep and eat on this policy. My uncle was/is a village leader and he has a lot to say about this. Anyway, this project also serves as a social bottom-line project so that no one is dying of hunger.
  • Compulsory Education, 9 years of compulsory education for children, no tuition. In this village, breakfast and lunch, which includes at least an egg plus a bag of milk, are paid for by the government.
  • ~20 USD/month basic allowance for peasants over 60 years old.

Have I forgotten something?

Yes, my grandma. She passed away 3 years ago in her 90s. In her last ~10 years, every time I met her, she would tell me she would like to live for more years as life nowadays is so much better than in the past. She would attribute all those to CCP and she even had a big poster of Mao Zedong for worship, burning incense and candles for him. Mao was the first CCP chairman and he and his colleagues laid some fundamental socialism doctrines for CCP.

From the change in my home village and the change in my grandma, my thoughts on CCP also changed from negative/neutral to positive.

Flash back to the town where I live and work. Year after year, we have got the industry, all sorts of industry, from light to heavy, from sea to space, from hardware to software. We have got technology, we are in the ballpark as far as the latest technology is concerned. With the change of landscape, with the experience we have at home and abroad, comes my perspective of the world. For a long time, we looked up at the world, especially at the developed countries. Gradually, we could look parallel at the world, even at the more developed world. When I had the chance to see the world horizontally, my thoughts on CCP were positive. It’s not an easy job. Putting me in that position, I would not do better, I am pretty sure!

Let me close this answer with a joke. When I talked with a youngster living in Germany about the punctuality of the German trains. I recalled the old days of perfect punctuality there. He told me: Nowadays the punctuality of the train system in Germany is like a joke. China high speed train is now better in this aspect.

No offense to my German friends, I admire and respect Germans as always. But you have your problems and we have our problems. The world is problematic. The party that admits the problem and does things to improve, rather talking and talking, is not a bad one.

Cheese Soup

cf6adf6dae41893b57a6127eb8c93920
cf6adf6dae41893b57a6127eb8c93920

Yield: 2 1/2 quarts

Ingredients

  • 3 stalks celery, chopped
  • 3 scallions, chopped
  • 1/4 cup butter, melted
  • 2 (10 3/4 ounce) cans condensed chicken broth
  • 3 cups water
  • 2 carrots, scraped and grated
  • 2 cups (8 ounces) shredded American cheese
  • 1/2 teaspoon dried parsley flakes
  • 1/8 teaspoon pepper
  • Dash of hot sauce
  • 1 (8 ounce) container sour cream
  • 3 tablespoons sherry

Instructions

  1. Sauté celery and scallions in butter in a large Dutch oven until vegetables are tender.
  2. Add chicken broth, water and carrot, stirring well. Bring to a boil. Cover, reduce heat and simmer for 30 minutes.
  3. Add potato soup and next 4 ingredients, stirring well. Simmer for 15 minutes.
  4. Add sour cream and sherry; heat thoroughly.

Absolute freedom does not exist. Freedom of speech also has red lines. Violations of the law and infringements on the rights of others are not allowed.

  1. China uses indirect elections to produce political elites rather than political stars, so there is no need for stage performances like actors. China does not have an American-style electoral system, and Xi does not need your vote. Therefore, the Clown Show of Trump and Harris insulting each other in the US election will not be staged in China.
  2. Xi is also a PRC citizen, and according to the PRC Constitution, he has the right to entrust the public prosecutor’s office to prosecute hate speech that demonizes him.

China has 800 million netizens, including over 400 million monthly active users on Weibo, who produce more than 30 billion pieces of information on a daily basis, and about 12,000 kinds of newspapers and periodicals.

It is fair to say that China, a country of the richest and most active thoughts, boasts the world’s largest information production.

What sort of logic is it to accuse China of having no freedom of speech?

What is the freedom of speech if it constitutes incitation to division, hatred, terrorism and extremism?


China is a country ruled by law. Whether you are guilty or not is determined based on your criminal behavior, not the nonsense you say.

I live in Changsha, Hunan Province, China. In the community park near my home, many elderly people gather every day, some of them dance square dance, and some do physical exercise.

Some of them openly express negative views about the government, Xi Jinping or the CPC, but they do not want to overthrow the government or engage in a color revolution, they just complain. Everyone laughs and forgets. No one took these nonsense words that were just to vent personal emotions seriously.

If someone makes negative comments, calling on people to overthrow the government, Xi and the CPC, inciting people to create terrorist incidents to confront, inciting people to throw bombs into the crowd, killing everyone present, or killing half or a third of the people present, do you think he should be arrested? Of course he should be arrested.

For example, Lee Ming-che, a party worker of Taiwan’s DPP, created multiple QQ groups during his stay in mainland China, with more than 2,000 members at most. He wrote and forwarded articles, books and videos that slandered and attacked the China’s political system through QQ groups, Facebook and WeChat platforms, inciting the overthrow of the China’s political system, indicating that “violent revolution” should be carried out, and even shared the formula for making explosives in QQ groups.

In March 2017, Lee Ming-che was arrested on suspicion of engaging in activities endangering national security. In November of the same year, he was sentenced to five years in prison and deprived of political rights for two years.

Should people who openly make negative comments about the government, Xi or the CPC and lead riots like the Hong Kong separatists be arrested? Of course they should be arrested.

In 2019, their criminal behavior has become an established fact.

So now some of these Hong Kong separatists have been brought to justice, and some have been wanted by the Hong Kong government.

(Visited 120 times, 1 visits today)
5 1 vote
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x