NEOCON A neoconservative (colloquially, neocon) in American politics is someone presented as a "conservative" but who actually favors big government, globalism, interventionism, perpetual war, police state, gun control, and a hostility to religion in politics and government. The word means "newly conservative," and thus formerly liberal. A neocon is a RINO Backer, and like RINOs does not accept most of the important principles in the Republican Party platform. Neocons do not participate in the March for Life, nor stand up for traditional marriage, advocate other conservative social values, or emphasize putting America first. Neocons support attacking and even overthrowing foreign governments, despite how that often results in more persecution of Christians. Some neocons (like Dick Cheney) have profited immensely from the military-industrial complex and their pro-war positions. Many neocons are globalists and support the War on Sovereignty. -Conservapedia
The Trump Administration, led by American neocons believe that they can wage “limited” nuclear, chemical and biological war without consequence.
We argue here that that idea is preposterous.
There will always be a response, and depending on the target nation, a host of responses. It is foolish to expect no response, or a “measured response”. Indeed, history tells us how absolutely ridiculous this belief is.
Today, China is dealing with the COVID-19 biological weapons attack by America on their CNY 2020 holiday. They have finished dealing with a CIA / NED sponsored “color revolution” in Hong Kong, and have just experienced a collapse of their BRI center at the Beirut Lebanon Port due to a mighty explosion (that has the hallmarks of a 6kT nuclear warhead). America has declared war on all Chinese technology, all Chinese trade, all international relationships, and all Chinese people. The anti-China propaganda effort is astounding in it’s size, magnitude, and pure visceral hate…
The COVID-19 biological attack is just the latest of at least six previous biological warfare actions by the Trump Administration, starting in 2017. Each time getting more and more aggressive. The sixth was the most brazen, with the use of drones to spray / fog swine flu viruses all over widely separate and remote pig farms.
I mean, you can’t get more ballsy than that!
The United States has done everything, and I do mean everything, short of launching nuclear ICBM’s at Chinese cities….
To assume that China will “let it roll of their shoulders” is a serious miscalculation. China has been making plans on how to deal with this situation, and has been working with Russia on military preparations. China will respond to all this, on their terms. At their pace. In their way.
And maybe they already have…
But…
And this is what this post is all about. We all need to consider the harsh reality that a nation that is willing to use biological warfare to achieve their goals will not have any problem with using nuclear weapons as well.
The following is a reprint of an article titled “The Myth of Moderate Nuclear War” by Brian Cloughley on Global Research, written on March 04, 2020 for the Strategic Culture Foundation. It was edited as necessary to fit this venue. All credit to the authors.
The Myth of Moderate Nuclear War
There are many influential supporters of nuclear war, and some of these contend that the use of ‘low-yield’ and/or short-range weapons is practicable without the possibility of escalation to all-out Armageddon.
"Ah. We can use "moderate" and "reasonable" nuclear weapons. It would never escalate into a full-fledged armageddon."
In a way their argument is comparable to that of the band of starry-eyed optimists who thought, apparently seriously, that there could be such a beast as a ‘moderate rebel’.
In October 2013 the Washington Post reported that…
“The CIA is expanding a clandestine effort to train opposition fighters in Syria amid concern that moderate, US-backed militias are rapidly losing ground in the country’s civil war,”
…and the US Congress gave approval to then President Barack Obama’s plan for training and arming moderate Syrian rebels to fight against Islamic State extremists.
The belief that there could be any grouping of insurgents that could be described as “moderate rebels” is bizarre and it would be fascinating to know how Washington’s planners classify such people.
What's a "moderate rebel"? Someone who drinks tea with their pinky up? A person who listens to Indie Rock, and spreads organic Avocado on their whole-wheat toast, or perhaps someone who advocates "humane" techniques of torture. "Moderate". What a nice, pleasant sounding term for a murderer.
It obviously didn’t dawn on them that any person who uses weapons illegally in a rebellion could not be defined as being moderate.
And how moderate is moderate?
Perhaps a moderate rebel could be equipped with US weapons that kill only extremists? Or are they allowed to kill only five children a month? The entire notion was absurd, and predictably the scheme collapsed, after expenditure of vast amounts of US taxpayers’ money.
A “Moderate” war
The leading publications of neoconservatives since the 1970s have been Commentary, The Public Interest (founded by Daniel Bell and Irving Kristol) and The Weekly Standard. Many Washington think tanks, such as the American Enterprise Institute (AEI), the Project For New American Century (PNAC), Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs (JINSA) and Henry Jackson Society are now dominated by neoconservatives. -Conservapedia
- Weekly Standard: An Inconvenient Truth About China
- Trump’s China Trade War Is Just the Beginning
- Trump Will Win America’s Trade War with China
- How China Was ‘Lost’
And even vaster amounts of money are being spent on developing and producing what might be classed as moderate nuclear weapons.
Moderate nuclear weapons, in that they don’t have the zillion-bang punch of most of its existing 4,000 plus warheads have.
It is apparently widely believed in Washington that if a nuclear weapon is (comparatively) small, then it’s less dangerous than a big nuclear weapon.
Well…
Maybe they are right. Look what happened in the Beirut Port Bombing in August 2020.
- Massive explosions in Beirut leave dozens dead and more …
- Beirut explosion: Massive blast at port rocks Lebanese capital
- Beirut explosion: 300,000 homeless, 135 dead and food …
And maybe this is exactly what the NEOCONS have been talking about all along…
And we know that this kind of event has been EXACTLY what the Trump NEOCONS have been arguing towards. Because, in January 2019 the Guardian reported that
“the Trump administration has argued the development of a low-yield weapon would make nuclear war less likely, by giving the US a more flexible deterrent. It would counter any enemy (particularly Russian) perception that the US would balk at using its own fearsome arsenal in response to a limited nuclear attack because its missiles were all in the hundreds of kilotons range and ‘too big to use’, because they would cause untold civilian casualties.”
Small nukes as a way to limit civilian deaths…
In fact, the nuclear war envisaged in that scenario would be a global catastrophe — as would all nuclear wars, because there’s no way, no means whatever, of limiting escalation.
Once a nuclear weapon has exploded and killed people, the nuclear-armed nation to which these people belonged is going to take massive action.
There is no alternative, because no government is just going to sit there and try to start talking with an enemy that has taken the ultimate leap in warfare.
It is fashionable to consider the use of low-yield nuclear weapons without consequence.
It is widely imagined — by many nuclear planners in the sub-continent, for example — that use of a tactical, a battlefield-deployed, nuclear weapon will in some fashion persuade the opponent (India or Pakistan) that there is no need to employ higher-capability weapons. Or, in other words, longer range missiles delivering massive warheads.
All retaliation would be measured, tit for tat.
These people think that the other side will evaluate the situation calmly and dispassionately and come to the conclusion that at most it should itself reply with a similar weapon.
Calmly.
Dispassionately.
But such a scenario supposes that there is good intelligence about the effects of the weapon that has exploded, most probably within the opponent’s sovereign territory.
This is verging on the impossible.
War is ugly and complex
War is confusing in the extreme, and tactical planning can be extremely complex. But there is no precedent for nuclear war, and nobody — nobody — knows for certain what reactions will be to such a situation in or near any nation.
The US 2018 Nuclear Posture Review (authorized by Trump as his NEOCON advisors Mike Pompeo and John Bolton) stated that low-yield weapons …
...“help ensure that potential adversaries perceive no possible advantage in limited nuclear escalation, making nuclear employment less likely”.
But do the possible opponents of the United States agree with that? How could they do so?
The reaction by any nuclear-armed state to what is confirmed as a nuclear attack will have to be swift.
But the neocons disagree, the threat of global conflagration will still exist.
The USA can launch small nuclear weapons, and reasonably expect no retaliation. ... That is because it would need to be a "measured" response. And if the attacked nation does not have low-yeld weapons, then they would refrain from using larger weapons. Instead, they would rely on their conventional arsenal. ... Right?
It cannot be guaranteed, for example, that the first attack will not represent a series.
It will, by definition, be decisive, because the world will then be a tiny step from doomsday. The US nuclear review is optimistic that “flexibility” will by some means limit a nuclear exchange, or even persuade the nuked-nation that there should be no riposte, which is an intriguing hypothesis.
As pointed out by Lawfare,
“the review calls for modification to ‘a small number of existing submarine-launched ballistic missile (SLBM) warheads’ to provide a low-yield option."
It also calls for further exploration of low-yield options, arguing that expanding these options will …
‘help ensure that potential adversaries perceive no possible advantage in limited nuclear escalation, making nuclear employment less likely.’
This is intended to address the argument that adversaries might think the United States, out of concern for collateral damage, would hesitate to employ a high-yield nuclear weapon in response to a ‘lower level’ conflict, in which an adversary used a low-yield nuclear device.
The review argues that expanding low-yield options is ‘important for the preservation of credible deterrence,’ especially when it comes to smaller-scale regional conflicts.”
“Credible deterrence” is a favorite catch-phrase of the believers in limited nuclear war, but its credibility is suspect.
Former US defense secretary William Perry said last year that he wasn’t so much worried about the vast number of warheads in the world as he was by open proposals that these weapons are “usable”.
It’s right back to the Cold War and he emphasizes that…
“The belief that there might be tactical advantage using nuclear weapons – which I haven’t heard being openly discussed in the United States or in Russia for a good many years... ... is happening now in those countries... ... which I think is extremely distressing.”
But the perturbing thing is that while it is certainly being discussed in Moscow, it’s doctrine in Washington.
America is now ready to use nuclear weapons to achieve it’s goals
In late February US Defense Secretary Esper was reported as having taken part in a…
“classified military drill in which Russia and the United States traded nuclear strikes.”
The Pentagon stated that …
“The scenario included a European contingency where you’re conducting a war with Russia and Russia decides to use a low-yield, limited nuclear weapon against a site on NATO territory.”
The US response was to fire back with what was called a “limited response.”
First of all, the notion that Russia would take the first step to nuclear war is completely baseless, and there is no evidence that this could ever be contemplated.
But ever if it were to be so, it cannot be imagined for an instant that Washington would indulge in moderate nuclear warfare in riposte. These self-justifying war-games are dangerous. And they bring Armageddon ever closer.
Today 2020
So, let’s perform a quick recap…
- The United States under President Trump is staffed with neocons.
- The United States is currently fighting eight wars plus a hybrid war with China.
- The United States has fielded “small” nuclear weapons.
- The United States has been using biological germ warfare against China.
- The President of the United States argues in favor of limited, surgical use of nuclear weapons to accomplish his objectives.
No matter what the United States does, China is still plugging away. It is still building things, trading things, and growing.
There will come a point in time where the neocons will feel that it is “now or never” to finally and completely suppress China.
…
LISTEN TO ME.
I have some points that I want to make perfectly clear.
- The Chinese and the Russians will know before hand what is going to happen. They have intel.
- If it is plausible that an event will happen on either Chinese or Russian land, they WILL strike first.
- The response will NOT be with “moderate” and “friendly” tactical weapons.
- It will be the unleashing of unholy terror.
America has NEVER experienced losing a war. It has NEVER been the vanquished people. Americans have no idea what it would be like to lose in a war…
So with this in mind, let’s look at what happened after Hitler killed himself in Germany, the nation surrendered to the Allies, and Victorious Russian troops flowed into Germany in 1945…
The Rape of Germany
When Berlin fell to the Soviets it is rumored that Stalin gave the Soviet Soldiers permission to do what ever they wanted for the first 3 days. At the end of that 3 days you would be hard pressed to find a single German woman who had not been raped at least once by the Soviet Soldiers.
Almost 100 percent of women between the ages of 8 and 80 were raped — repeatedly — some as many as 60 to 70 times.
Estimates are around 2,000,000 women were raped in Germany, 100,000 in Berlin. These estimates are based in part on the number of requested abortions that climbed markedly after the Russians arrived.
Female deaths in connection with the rapes in Germany, overall, are estimated at 240,000
War historians have described it as the “greatest phenomenon of mass rape in history”, and have concluded that at least 1.4 million women were raped in East Prussia, Pomerania and Silesia alone.
Civilians from occupied countries and even Russian women rescued from work camps were at risk and Stalin gave his silent assent to this mayhem.
Stalin said people should
“…understand it if a soldier who has crossed thousands of kilometers through blood and fire and death has fun with a woman or takes some trifle”.
On another occasion, when told that Red Army soldiers sexually maltreated German refugees, he reportedly said:
"We lecture our soldiers too much; let them have their initiative."
The smart women didn’t resist or found an officer to bed. Officers tended to be more civilized and would protect their “women” from the rampaging enlisted men.
Magda Wieland, a 24-year-old actress, was dragged from a cupboard in her apartment just off the Kurfürstendamm. A very young soldier from central Asia hauled her out. He was so excited at the prospect of a beautiful young blonde that he ejaculated prematurely. By sign language, she offered herself to him as a girlfriend if he would protect her from other Russian soldiers, but he went off to boast to his comrades and another soldier raped her. Ellen Goetz, a Jewish friend of Magda’s, was also raped. When other Germans tried to explain to the Russians that she was Jewish and had been persecuted, they received the retort:
“Frau ist Frau.”
Women soon learned to disappear during the “hunting hours” of the evening. Young daughters were hidden in storage lofts for days on end. Mothers emerged into the street to fetch water only in the early morning when Soviet soldiers were sleeping off the alcohol from the night before. Sometimes the greatest danger came from one mother giving away the hiding place of other girls in a desperate bid to save her own daughter. Older Berliners still remember the screams every night. It was impossible not to hear them because all the windows had been blown in.
According to a former Russian army officer:
“We were young, strong, and four years without women. So we tried to catch German women and … Ten men raped one girl. There were not enough women; the entire population run from the Soviet Army. So we had to take young, twelve or thirteen year-old. If she cried, we put something into her mouth. We thought it was fun. Now I can not understand how I did it. A boy from a good family… But that was me."
A woman telephone operator from the Russian Army recalled that:
“When we occupied every town, we had first three days for looting and … [rapes]. That was unofficial of course. But after three days one could be court-martialed for doing this. … I remember one raped German woman laying naked, with hand grenade between her legs. Now I feel shame, but I did not feel shame back then… Do you think it was easy to forgive [the Germans]? We hated to see their clean undamaged white houses. With roses. I wanted them to suffer. I wanted to see their tears. … Decades had to pass until I started feeling pity for them.”
Abortions were the preferred choice of rape victims, and many died as a consequence of internal injuries after being brutally violated, untreated sexually transmitted diseases due to a lack of medicine, badly performed abortions, and suicides, particularly for traumatized victims who had been raped many times.
In addition, many children died in post-war Germany as a result of widespread starvation, scarce supplies, and diseases such as typhus and diphtheria. The infant mortality in Berlin reached up to 90 percent.
German historian Miriam Gebhardt …
“believes that members of the US military raped as many as 190,000 German women by the time West Germany regained sovereignty in 1955, with most of the assaults taking place in the months immediately following the US invasion of Nazi Germany. "
The author bases her claims in large part on reports kept by Bavarian priests in the summer of 1945.
Conclusion
War is a terrible, terrible thing.
The idea that the NEOCONS in America in Washington DC are in favor of it, by any means possible should send a shiver down the spines of anyone reading Metallicaman. How can I spell this out to you? If America gets involved in a kinetic “hot” war with another major power, it will not survive.
The chances are high that it will end up becoming a vanquished nation in a ruined world, and the rest of the world will expect Holy Hell from the survivors inside America. It will not be pretty or pleasant.
To avoid the coming conflict that the neoconservatives’ pursuit of American hegemony is bringing, the Russians have relied on fact-based, truth-based diplomacy. However, neocon Washington relies on lies and propaganda and has many more and much louder voices. Consequently, it is Washington’s lies, not Russia’s truth, that most of the Western sheeple believe. In other words, Russia was misled by believing that the West respects and abides by the values that it professes. In fact, these “Western values” are merely a cover for the unbridled evil of which the West consists. The Western peoples are so dimwitted that they have not yet understood that the “war on terror” is, in fact, a war to create terror that can be exported to Muslim areas of Russia and China in order to destabilize the two countries that serve as a check on Washington’s unilateral, hegemonic power. The problem for the neocon unilateralists is that Russia and China—although misinformed by their “experts” educated abroad in the neoliberal tradition, people who are de facto agents of Washington without even knowing it—are powerful military powers, both nuclear and conventional. Unless Russia and China are content to be Washington’s vassal states, for the neoconservatives, who control Washington and, thereby, the West, to press these two powerful countries so hard can only lead to war. As Washington is not a match for Russia and China in conventional warfare, the war will be nuclear, and the result will be the end of life on Earth. -Paul Craig Roberts
Or, more likely, the end of life as we have known it to be, on earth.
Do you want more?
Do you want to see similar posts?
I hope that you found this post curious. Please take care. You can view other similar posts in my SHTF Index, here…
SHTF ArticlesArticles & Links
You’ll not find any big banners or popups here talking about cookies and privacy notices. There are no ads on this site (aside from the hosting ads – a necessary evil). Functionally and fundamentally, I just don’t make money off of this blog. It is NOT monetized. Finally, I don’t track you because I just don’t care to.
- You can start reading the articles by going HERE.
- You can visit the Index Page HERE to explore by article subject.
- You can also ask the author some questions. You can go HERE to find out how to go about this.
- You can find out more about the author HERE.
- If you have concerns or complaints, you can go HERE.
- If you want to make a donation, you can go HERE.
Please kindly help me out in this effort. There is a lot of effort that goes into this disclosure. I could use all the financial support that anyone could provide. Thank you.
Mr Man. I’ll be eternally grateful for all you’ve revealed to us about how the world really works.
I just hope you’re aware, too, that global research has been flagged repeatedly by Veterans Today and others as a zionist disinfo site.
Just an FYI as you refer to them frequently enough.
I’d hate to think of you being had as you live your no doubt busy life in foreign climes. It happens to the best of us!!
To me their stuff stinks to high heaven of cointelpro. And not in the US’s favour.
Have some work experience in this area and can spot the ‘reveals’ easily enough. But they are good at it, that’s fo’ sho.
Take care,
U.
You are correct, and thanks for the head’s up. The most dangerous propaganda is that which we want to believe. Now, that being stated, the Beirut Port bombing was unique. Two missiles took out an entire port complex and all of the surrounding homes. That’s pretty darn amazing.
Have you seen the damage that a 1000 lb bomb does? I have. In fact, I know it quite well. That is the standard “top” high-end for Air to Surface munitions with guidance systems. With the mid-size being a 500 lb bomb. It doesn’t even approach this. Not even remotely.
So what could provide a bigger payload? Nuclear.
But doesn’t nuclear weapons take out cities? This was just a port; an area about 1/6 of the size of a city. How is this even possible? Micro-Nuke.
Of the exact size and shape that the NEOCONS in Washington DC have been advocating all these years. Was it a micro-nuke?
I do not know. But does it matter?
It appears to be cutting edge technology that the Untied States government has been promoting for years. A technology that the USA leads in, and that was used by it’s allies.
It appears to be used successfully in this instance. It hit Lebanon, and there wasn’t any serious repercussions at all for either the United State or Israel. Because of this reaction, we can see the following…
[1] The technology has been developed independent of civilian “sqwalk”.
[2] The technology is mature, and has been fielded against a third-tier target with no repercussions.
[3] The USA probably has these weapons fielded right now.
[4] The USA Navy is probably carting these weapons around China right now.
[5] Both Russia and China are aware of this, even if you, the reader are not.
[6] Use of this weapon on either Russian or Chinese soil WILL result in a MAD-level nuclear response.
Agreed. Thanks for the additional insights.
Watch very little news and focus on matters of the mind, mainly. As well as some outdoor activity on the old farm we live on.
The Beirut thing has indeed disappeared without trace, as these things do! And this reveals total media control. Total.
As did the Tianjin nuke, Bali, and others.
But I’m more convinced it’s a transnational group operating over and above national government no matter how seemingly powerful. eg That of the US.
It’s the general flavour of global research I was referring to. But nevertheless Truth is still discernible even through Alex Jones or Kerry Cassidy!
Provided one recognises the reveals. Intentional or no.
Personally convinced there’ll be no election stateside this winter. And something big is in the works. I can sense it here even from this side of the pond.
We’ll know soon enough.
And as it stands, surely war is the only thing now that could possibly restart the global economy quickly. And refashion it according to the Great Work.
Only question is: will the plan work? And on whose terms?
If they DON’T strike against BRICS now it’ll be too late in 10 years, or so. (Everybody knows, for example, that even Brazil has a nuclear programme and undoubtedly possesses strike capability too. Although limited. Argentina, too. )
Stay safe, it’s gonna be a strange Autumn/winter.
U.
Your site seems to have gotten ‘delisted’ from some Internets search engines like Bing, DuckDuckGo etc
I concur about your prediction of the USA soon to be openly using nukes on China be it a WWIII full scale scenario or a small scale tactical nukes in the SCS and have written about it on my blog here:
https://forum.ascendchina.ch/t/americas-evil-plan-to-nuke-china-as-the-final-solution-to-genocide-all-1-4-billion-chinese-people-on-earth/85
The US has indeed already used biowar (ASF swine pork, CIAVID-19, etc) , small scale tactical nukes (against China’s BRI ports) and have also chokepointed China’s technology ascension by cutting China off from semiconductor independency and the entire semiconductor supply chain via strong arm sanctions… That EUV machine that China already purchased from ASML was mysteriously set on fire (CIA sent an agent hitman-style is my best guess) and by the time they repaired the factory the export license had expired and the US pressured ASML to refuse delivery etc) and not to mention color revolutions left and right like Bolivia (to deprive China from lithium to make batteries EV needed to exports its EV tech abroad) and now Beirut and Belarus etc etc etc…
I wouldn’t surprise me that running up to the election Trump will tell ARM, TSMC, AMD and Intel to stop all exports (and cut all business relations) of all chips to entire country of China and all Chinese companies (no longer limited to Huawei, ZTE, and other companies already on the US shit list etc) as a means to chokepoint China much like how the US blockade Japanese oil during WWII… indeed processor chips are the modern oil in this information age and not so ironically China spends more money importing processor chips than it does oil! AI is predicated upon the silicon stack, without the physical processors the AI networks get nowhere fast. US knows this is China’s greatest weakpoint and will use it to strike very soon…
All Chinese Americans currently living in the USA, hear me now: the US government will put/us you all into concentration camps, the US government will gas chamber all of us and put us into death camps and oven us and likely this will happen in October or November of this year 2020 but almost for sure before the end of 2020 year… It would be wise to operate on this assumption as the default stance no matter how hard it is to believe that this could happen so fast…. Consider this my public service announcement, do with the info what you will…. No amount of ‘prepping’ is going to do you any good, forget about trying to make “friends” with your white neighboors in the naive false hope that they help you or that they won’t cheer on the US Gov as you get rounded up and hoarded away and they get to occupy your house, take your preps and commandeer your vehicles left behind… When push comes to shove, and push is coming to shove, race will be the ultimate identity/label/grouping and association, not what nationality is written on your passport or where you were born or what company you work for or what flag you fly on your front lawn…..
Be woke
Hi congjing yu, long time…
I have been following your posts, but as I had to leave Israel it was a bit different this time. I am in Europe now, but I need to return to Israel, an idea I do not like, yet a man has his obligations and duties.
I have been very sad with the Beirut explosion, got sadder when I read your post, still I am not convinced on what it was, and in contrast to being convinced what it wasn’t.
A commenter here, which I very much like to read made a statement regarding two sites. The first, in my opinion is a useful platform, packed with writers, some I like more than others, yet I do not agree on not agree based on writers name or platform.
The second site made me sad, I tried to read it in the past, as a veteran myself this site doesn’t make sense. It’s full of anger and hate in major doses. The report on the Beirut blast was a mix of details and assumptions, some looks legit, others fake as a bat, the assumption could be right but the way was full of cheap Photoshop and a ruling that a bird is a missile even when it’s a bird. Could have, might have and probably was something other than the official story, but sometimes a bird is just a bird.
Anyway, the highlights lied in the comments section. It’s reminded me a film with Jack Nicholson and Adam Sandler – Anger management. Interestingly, the one that needed this the most is the editor and the writer of the article himself. He seems to be suffering from a severe trauma and sees Zionists everywhere. This is not a joke, these people tend to see their daemons and fears everywhere, not the truth, like McCarthyism, Anti-muslimism hidden as anti-terror and the anti-china hate parade today. To be clear, I am part of an old Jewish heritage and I am very proud in it. I am as well Israeli by birth.
Thank you for that.
Politics, especially global politics are confusing to me. I try to keep out of them. My thing is technology and the way that the universe works.
What interests me about the recent bombing is that this warning was posted on the Saker website weeks BEFORE the bombing;
Which makes things interesting.
But, as I said, technology is my thing. That explosion in size and magnitude could not possibly come from conventional munitions. Most of my munitions experience is on the 1000 pound and 500 pound payload range. This is many, many times larger. If it was carried on the Air-to-surface missile during a “shake and bake” run, then it would HAVE to be nuclear. Size and damage indicates a micro-nuke in the 6kt range, with is pretty much what the China Lake NWC has been working on since the mid 1990’s.
A gamma radiation burst was detected in Sicily, Italy and then the station immediately went off line. “Equipment malfunction” was the reason. Like I said, technology is my bad. The station was using a Geiger Counter with a SBM-20 tube. These things are immensely robust, and do not malfunction. They are inherently simple devices. Think of a paperclip in simplicity. It either detects gamma radiation, and gives off a ping, or it doesn’t. The default for malfunction is a cracked tube. In which case the output is zero.
For me, I am convinced that a micro nuke was used. The BRI as part of the Chinese land-route has been put on hold by Israel and I am positive that the United States is mightily pleased with this outcome. Now, it’s sad that is occurred, and I am sure that many illusions are destroyed, but that’s life. You would be stunned to see the things that the United States has been involved in over the years. No. They are not right, they are not fair, but they are what they are.
I look at things as war, but in this case it’s mostly peaceful. Only a few hundred deaths, and a few thousand causalities. That sure beats the millions of deaths and hundreds of millions of causalities were a full-on war to break out. I don’t like it, and I don’t understand it. I just know that it exists, and that the people in charge of the governments in the West are all fucking idiots that haven’t a clue as to what they are dealing with.
Just go to some place safe. Spend time with those you love and eat fine delicious food. You have the moments now. Treasure them. The leadership in the West have plans that might make these events become increasingly scarce and valuable.
Thanks. I agree. As the official story doesn’t hold water, nor scientific logic and the direct beneficiaries are obviously US and Israel among others it make sense they are to blame.
Anyways, something made me curious, we miss something, I am sure of that. A big piece in the puzzle, and until it will make an appearance, Some thoughts:
A day after, maybe hours, Israel stepped down its forces at the border of Lebanon. To me that doesn’t make sense, unless…
Approximately At the same time frame, other explosions occurred, couldn’t confirm all, seems the ones in a chemical plant near Wuhan, in multiply whorehouses for food in Najaf, Iraq and in the market Ajman, UAE are legit.
It gives weight to a war by other means operation, targeting economies and food chains. it could be as As well just a divert and confuse strategy.
Regarding tech, initial explosion then a secondary one, two stages, huge secondary stage ignite by a minor one. I believe I have seen that before ….
I am attaching some videos, one is showing an exact explosion and shock wave, Syria, Around Dec 2019. I cannot confirm if it’s legit, nor identify a missile hit.
The other videos describe a thermometric explosion, it is amazing and you can see clearly the similarities to what we observed in Beirut – first the ignition: two phases, second the result: limited explosion than a huge radius shock wave.. This is quiet old, I can assume the tech has developed since then. If I have to, I will put my money on that, before going nuclear 🙂
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=voHv-t27tjw
https://youtu.be/mETwXfB2mS0?t=110
You could very well be correct.
Using two missiles for a nuclear detonation does not make sense, and this has had me “scratching my head”. I am tending to agree with you that this could be a thermometric explosion. Certainly is the destruction could be done by conventional explosives it would make more sense.
No one will ever know the truth. But in my mind the culprits are clear, as are the participants. We know the reason and how this changes the global dynamics. So I guess, that is all we need to know.
Guys… US stole alien tech, mastered the ability to make a nano hydrogen bomb by triggering it with laser. No need for fission, and yield can be kept to any arbitrarily small or large scale.
Today China tested carrier killer missile into the SCS all the way from almost Gobi desert…
Its happening folks.
Chinese Americans will get gassed in October when war breaks out.
USD going to zero by end of 2020
The U.S. dollar is backed by the world’s most powerful military. By an order of magnitude more powerful than anything else on the planet.
The U.S. dollar isn’t going anywhere. They can print until kingdom come.
If it was backed by a gold standard sure. It’d have tanked by now.
As for the gas chamber spiel, you’re mistaking the nature of American society. It’s divided along class lines, not racial lines.
If it comes to a true SHTF event this autumn, the only people being gassed will be the comfortable, chattering classes with money. Regardless of skin colour. Or the poor, whoever gets the upper hand. Remember 1789?
And you can bet your bottom yuan on that, amigo.
Moreover, I think you’re a tad racist in a way that some regular folks would find offensive, to be honest. But hey, it isn’t my blog.
People are gonna have to work together to beat this beast.
So be a Rufus. Not a racist.
Americans don’t gas each other regardless of skin color.
Although black ops programmes worldwide WILL gas anybody they happen to choose.
Stay safe!
U.
Some people would consider your comments outlandish and insulting.
I do not.
You are only repeating your observations with a healthy dose of opinion based from your own personal experiences. Good for you! I just wish that everyone would be this way and do this. I mean that. More people should speak as openly and as brazenly as you do. People should not be timid. They should be themselves.
As far as your projections are concerned, I just do not know. There is going to be a reset, that is for certain. Everyone from the most conservative in the forum to those that don’t even pay attention to the news agree on that. The question is how big the magnitude would be and whether it would affect them personally.
To me, it is as if there is this big balloon being pumped full of shit all of your life. It is just sitting there in your front yard, and every minutes, of every day for years it has been pumped full of shit. It started long before you were born, and not even your grandparents knew who set it up or why it is being pumped with so much shit. The point is that it is, and of late this balloon has been getting bigger and bigger. Much more than at any time int he past.
It looks like it’s going to pop! To explode!
But that’s the way that it has been for the last few decades. Nothing actually happens. It just gets bigger, that’s all.
But this time it is different. You see cracks starting to form, and the balloon is really, really thin. No animals want to go near it, and the cats are in hiding, and the dogs ran off.
The questions are…
[1] Can the balloon be deflated somehow?
[2] When it explodes, how bad will all the damage be?
[3] The best thing is to be far away from it when it does explode, but you do know that everyone will feel the effects.
[4] What kind of life will remain afterwards?
Ah. We will see.
“”The U.S. dollar is backed by the world’s most powerful military. By an order of magnitude more powerful than anything else on the planet.
The U.S. dollar isn’t going anywhere. They can print until kingdom come.””
Order of magnitude, is that base 10? Or you using binary counting system? Because if its the typical decimal system there is no way the US military is more than 10 times more powerful than China’s or Russia’s, this is a grotesque exaggeration at best…
And you got it backwards, every single reserve curreny in the history of the world has tanked or been replaced… by you stating “They can print until kingdom come.”, you shoulder the burden to prove that the dollar is somehow ‘exceptional’ to the rule, but rationale you provided of the exaggeration of the US military being order of magnitude more powerful than anything else out there is hardly proof….
It is precisely because the dollar went off the gold standard back in the 70’s that sooner or later the dollar status as reverse currency will tank, either that or US triggers world war III and scorthed earth policy means we all burn to extinction… but one way or another its coming to an end, just a matter of timing, but the event itself is a mathematical certainty… Physics, like math, is not subject to opinions. Brentwoods had a nice run, Petrodollar hegemony had a nice run… its time…
I think Trump WILL gas all Chinese Americans soon, maybe in October. I hope to be proven wrong, but I’m not the one who ordered an attack on China and then repeatedly, intentionally, and purposefully called it Invisible China Virus…
I very much agree.
“But that’s the way that it has been for the last few decades. Nothing actually happens. It just gets bigger, that’s all.
But this time it is different. You see cracks starting to form, and the balloon is really, really thin. No animals want to go near it, and the cats are in hiding, and the dogs ran off.”
Remembering 2008 , 2003, 2001 ( 9-11) and more. it’s a long parade.
I think we all see something more like 1929, which could lead to something much bigger or not. As you mentioned, timelines and future timelines, especially when trying to predict a precise date and time of events ( even by year ) are prone to so many variables. 7 billion souls, wishes, fears, anxieties, hopes that it is rationally and logically impossible to predict a certain future (even if your name is John Titor).
Someone here mentioned mathematics. He’s right as well, It’s mathematics and it’s physics. throwing quantum physics into the table and even this small discussion here regarding future events, might alter them.
And I couldn’t agree more with the balloon metaphor.
First true Time Travel game
https://vimeo.com/450589099
Bo, I took your time machine for a spin. Went to November to have Thanksgiving dinner early. Just so happens that all the Chinese Americans hoarded all the turkey.
@Ohio Guy
The game has a Time Travel mechanics but its not actually true time travel. For example I can keep going back in time to steal fuel rods from myself and end up with a mountain of uranium fuel which means I got something from nothing…
=====
I think Russia learned its lesson from WWII, that if it was again able to be convinenced to turn against China, and to help US collapse China, that in turn it too would be next to fold… So if anything, in the immediate term its more likely that the US will attempt to strangle both China and Russia at the same time, by cutting them off from SWIFT and also by attempting to enforce some sort of naval blockade.
The acts of cutting China (and possibly Russia as well) out of SWIFT by itself will be meaningless and counterproductive if not enforced by a military naval blockade to stop the physical transportation of goods in addition to the financial movement of money. But this would be the same as declaring war and at that point China has nothing left to lose by not using its carrier killer missiles, after all they are not just for show and were built specifically for contingencies such as these, as well SCS and BRI were also other contingency plans to mitigate the effects of such a predicament imposed upon China by any hostile superpower… and to bring down blockchain (digital Yuan) you would have to take down the Internet or at least cut the sea cables to both the Russia and Chinese landmasses…
America cannot fight both Russia and China at the same time and hope to maintain its hegemony and USD status as global reserve currency… Of course the US has enough nukes to do a scorthed earth implementation but that is rather a lose lose situation and hardly considered a net positive win in any perspective. But merely maintaining status quo and a non kinetic solution also seems very likely the US losing its hegemony status over time, just a rather slow and more steady decline compared to a fast and sudden crash if it were to instigate a hot war with a peer power and lose… its much easier for China to defend itself than for the US to attack it on China’s own turf.. at the first island chain the US has no chance, beyond that as time goes on China pushes out further and further, by 2035 US will be pushed back to Guam or beyond at current trends.
America believes in scortched earth, but I think I do as well… its better that humans all burn and give the rest of the lifeforms on earth a chance rather than China kowtow to Amerikkka and Chinese people willingly becomes slaves of Whitey again…. but thats just my perspective, the CCP is a lot more naive and conservative…
Bo Chen, when you say, “America believes in a scorched earth”, you do mean the evil, rich, bastards with monied interests connected with politics and corporations and not poor redneck white folk like myself. Am I correct? By the way, I have never been a slave holder nor have any of my great, great, grandparents that I know for sure. I’ll also wager that I’ve watched more Chinese Kung Fu movies than you.
See Century of Humiliation, Chinese Exclusion Act, and Eight Nation Alliance / Opium wars and the forced theft of Hong Kong
Trump wasnt the first to single out The China Virus ( he means ethnic Chinese people are a virus infecting the world etc) since the Chinese Exclusion Act passed by US gov back in 1880s was the first and only Federal law that forbid a group based on national origin (China) and today we are seeing a repeat of this…
TikTok being forced to sell to US company, Trump taking a cut of transaction, then Chinese parent company Bytedance gets on US entity list anyway, forcing Apple Store and Google Play to delist it internationally is the beginning of the new 21st version of China’s Century of Humiliation….
US targeting China in the South China Sea, getting India, Australia, New Zealand, UK, Japan and Tiawan to gang up on China in the region to cut China off from international trade and access to the open waters is the new Eight Nation Alliance against China….
Huawei, TikTok, DJI, no Chinese firm is safe, whatever the pretext no longer matters, the gloves are off and the US intent is to contain, reverse, erase, collapse China by all means possible… its first time US confronted a great power competition that isnt Caucasin ( Trumps word not mine) and Pompeo believes in the literal “rapture”…. and China being the Central Threat of Our Times…
My impression is the American government will go to any lengths to stop China including if the cost was to include depopulating the vast majority of its own American citizens….
This is the ultimate blackmail…. either China kowtows to Anerican terror or the US is crazy enough to make the whole world burn…
Problem is in this game of chicken my fear is CCP will blink first and the 1.5 billion Chinese may once again be forced to slavery and humiliation under a white lead world order and the so called full spectrum dominance etc