This is a really good movie to watch if you like silly/fun movies, parody movies, or john candy. It has a great blend of comedy, wit, action and all sorts of other things. I am pretty surprised by the low rating. Its not the best movie by any means, but greatly above standard and really enjoyable.
I used to have it on BetaMAX, which as a superior Sony product that was much, much better than VHS. I had the Super BetaMAX which consisted of a basic BetaMAX with a secondary image and sound unit that sat under it. The entire time when I was in training at China Lake NWC, we watched beta movies using this system on a tiny Sony color television screen.
This was during the early to middle 1980’s.
And yes, I know that everything is so very dated, and unknown to many of my readers, it was time, a very different time. It was a time when everyone was asking “Where’s the beef?”, drinking Strawberry coke, which later turned into Cherry Coke, and then Real Coke, and then Improved Coke, and finally to Coke classic. At that time in my life, the world-line slides were all over the place and the type of soda beverages we drank was constantly in flux.
Madonna was big.
A day did not go by where you couldn’t hear one of her songs. Same goes for Tears for Fears, cure, Cindi Lauper and Spandau Ballet.
Pee Wee Herman was outrageous. Just like David Lee Roth, and Rodney Dangerfield. If I ever decide to say “fuck it” and to construct a time machine, it would be one that would take me back to here…
But let’s get back to the movie at hand.
This is one of the movies that I had on BetaMAX and it starred one of my favorites actors; John Candy. What a true shame that he died so young. Those who find death an interesting subject will find this link fascinating about his death. It seems that he overworked himself in filming a movie, ate a late dinner at night (of spaghetti of all things), and died of a heart attack while sleeping. Do not ever work yourself to death. LINK about the circumstances about his death HERE.
As you get older you start to realize that you are no longer young and can “take on the world”. You have friends who get cancer, classmates who have died, good drinking buddies that have died, and close friends telling you of uncles that worked too hard, went to sleep and never woke up.
You start to take better care of what you do.
And so…
…you “hedge your bets”. You eat better, and are choosier bout what you eat, when and why. You exercise somewhat, and you go easy on the medications and the chemicals that you put in your body.
And you run affirmation prayer campaigns.
I personally like to use this movie to illustrate how thoughts can alter our reality, and that is exactly what the theme of this movie is. When you write up your campaign, think of yourself as Jack Gable (John Candy) writing up a script for you to experience.
That’s the way prayer affirmation campaigns work.
About the movie…
Delicious in parts 9 February 2007 | by hatchersan – See all my reviews The all time best line in the movie -- John Candy rescuing Emma Samms on horseback -- "This stranger knows no danger!" A bit spotty -- can't maintain a high comedy level throughout but nonetheless is enjoyable and a vehicle for John Candy to demonstrate comic range. Excited he will get to spend a romantic weekend tryst with Emma Samms (and misunderstanding her feminine wiles), he finds himself lugging umpteen of her suitcases to the taxi cab, then knocks himself out with the trunk door as he tries to load the suitcases. Wakes up in the pleasant little village where she reappears as new character, daughter of Raymund Burr, along with others in town, Mariel Hemingway et al. Plenty of lines for Candy in trying to write the new soap opera about family conspiracies with a stolen formula, and the rapid disintegration of Emma's brother while none in the family seem to notice or care. Again the highlight to me was the rescue chase by Candy when Emma's horse took her on a wild ride and Candy rides up and self congratulates later as modern day Zorro or Lone Ranger. All in all, enjoyable.
…
In New York City, Jack Gable (John Candy) grows irate waiting for the cable television repairman to arrive at his apartment.
When the signal is finally restored, he turns on “Beyond Our Dreams”, a daytime soap opera, explaining to the repairman that he writes for the show.
Later that morning, Jack goes to the production office for a meeting. There, he stumbles into Louise (Mariel Hemmingway), a demure actress who intends to audition for the role of “Janet Dubois.”
After insisting that “Janet” is no longer part of the story, Jack storms into Lou (David Orbach) and Arlene Sherwood’s (Renee Taylor) office. The two executives distract him by reminding him to “kill off” the character of “Rachel Hedison,” played by the temperamental Laura Claybourne (Emma Sams). Jack, who has a crush on the beautiful actress, refuses.
Lou pats him on the shoulder and tells Jack that everything will work out. After Jack leaves, Arlene calls writer Arnie Fetterman, who assures her that the “Janet Dubois” scenes are complete, and that he is working on writing “Rachel” out of the show.
After “Beyond Our Dreams” wraps up shooting for the day, an infatuated Jack asks Laura Claybourne what she thinks of the future story-lines he created for her, but the self-absorbed actress is unhappy with how he turned her rich heiress character into a working girl.
Jack returns home and packs for a weekend trip to Vermont. Laura Claybourne calls, seeking Jack’s attention. When he tells her he is about to leave, she invites herself along. Jack is thrilled, until she changes her mind at the last minute.
En route to Vermont, Jack gets into a car accident, awakening in the hospital on “Beyond Our Dreams.” The doctor (David Rasche) introduces himself as “Paul Kirkwood,” amusing Jack, who presumes that the actor, Dennis Graham, is playing a trick on him.
However, when the writer goes to the window, he is shocked to see the town of “Ashford Falls” bustling with activity.
Jack deduces that he is dead and living in hell.
When the nurse threatens to give him a shot, Jack plays along and insists he is feeling better.
Leaving the hospital, he encounters “Janet Dubois,” who recognizes him as Wall Street tycoon “Jack Gates,” a character created by Jack, but who has yet to be introduced on the show.
Across the street, a man with an eye patch (Charles Rocket) observes Jack and Janet, before driving away to a mansion.
There, he proudly informs his father, billionaire Carter Hedison (Raymond Burr), that Jack Gates is in town.
Carter Hedison dismisses his son, Ty, as a dreamer, and asks Ty’s yuppie brother, Blake, to investigate.
Meanwhile, Jack tries to make sense of his situation in his hotel room.
Janet informs him that he is in Ashford Falls to purchase her father’s pharmaceutical formula, which Carter Hedison also hopes to acquire.
Jack insists he is a writer, not a businessman, provoking Janet to retort that he should write his life as he sees it, rather than argue with her.
She storms out, and Jack decides to test her advice.
He types a scene on his typewriter, and realizes that whatever he writes comes true in this alternate reality.
After encountering a dismissive “Rachel Hedison” downtown, Jack decides to use his newfound power to make her fall in love with him.
A decent Candy vehicle LCShackley10 January 2007 This is a much more watchable film than many of the lightweight vehicles Candy took part in in his post-SCTV career. His part could have been played by any number of comic actors, but John steps in and gives it his best shot. He's always fun to watch on screen, and he has a good time here without going over the top, which he tended to do. DELIRIOUS is a weird mixture of Groundhog Day, Soapdish, and various Rod Serling scripts in which the characters in a story are being controlled by someone at a typewriter. It's a workable premise, and the actors make the most of the stock soap opera characters they play. David Rasche, Emma Samms, Raymond Burr et al were well-chosen for their parts. Bit parts by Robert Wagner and Marvin Kaplan (the voice of Choo-Choo on TOP CAT) are also memorable. Mariel Hemingway takes some flak on this comment board for her part, but she seemed suited for the role and moved smoothly from her gawky character to the soap opera "devil woman." This is a pleasant comedy but not as consistently funny as SOAPDISH. The script by veteran writers of Gilligan's Island and Bewitched suffers from a lot of unnecessary "language" (for what could otherwise be a family film) but moves along at a brisk pace (except for the longish horse-riding scenes).
That afternoon, Rachel goes horseback riding with her boyfriend, Dr. Kirkwood. Suddenly, her horse breaks into a gallop. Just as she is about to careen over a cliff, Jack appears on his own horse and rescues her.
He does not reveal his identify, and Rachel swoons as he rides away.
That night, Carter Hedison and his three children-Rachel, Ty, and Blake-discuss making a fortune from a new fat-burning pill.
Blake notes that their scheme will be ruined if Jack Gates acquires the drug formula.
Later, Janet Dubois calls Jack and informs him that someone broke into her father’s laboratory.
She accuses him of working for the Hedisons, but Jack protests.
Just then, she realizes someone is still in the lab.
Hearing her screams, Jack quickly types a rescue mission featuring himself as the hero.
Afterward, the love-struck Janet invites Jack to have dinner with her.
A few days later, the Hedison family hosts a benefit auction in the town square. Jack stuns everyone when he drives up in a flashy sports car.
Against her father’s wishes, Rachel leaves with Jack, who tries to impress her by driving recklessly at high speed while blindfolded.
That night, Janet grows despondent while waiting for Jack to arrive for dinner.
Someone knocks on the door and introduces himself as “Jack Gates,” but he is not the Jack she knows.
The two confront Jack at his hotel.
The writer recognizes the stranger as Robert Wagner (himself), a prime time soap opera star who was originally to be cast as Jack Gates.
Unknown to the trio, Ty Hedison lurks outside with a gun, stalking Jack Gates. However, he misfires, and Robert Wagner is killed.
Jack grabs his typewriter, reviving Robert Wagner and sending him away on a trip.
Out of concern for Janet, Jack writes her a new story line in which she is a research scientist in Africa.
In the days that follow, Jack sequesters himself in his hotel room, where he drinks alcohol and writes preposterous scenes in hope of winning Rachel’s affection.
During a party at the Hedison mansion, Jack plays a virtuoso piano piece, saves a choking man’s life, and performs a dance routine with Rachel.
Much to his surprise, Janet Dubois returns to Ashford Falls.
She makes an elegant appearance at the party, before learning that she, not Rachel, is Carter Hedison’s daughter.
Chaos ensues as the Hedison family turns on each other.
When Janet is accidentally shot by Blake Hedison, Jack admits his feelings for her.
As she is rushed to the hospital, Blake informs Jack that Dr. Kirkwood plans to botch the surgery.
The writer returns to his hotel room, but before he can write a new scene, Robert Wagner walks in and shoots him.
Jack awakens in a hospital bed on the set of “Beyond Our Dreams”.
Actors Laura Claybourne and Dennis Graham comfort him, but he accuses them of being insincere, before realizing he is back in New York City, with the whole experience in Ashford Falls just a dream (similar to the twist ending of ‘The Wizard of Oz’).
The next day, Jack confronts the Sherwoods at their office and insists they allow him free reign in writing the character of “Janet.”
Arlene chokes on her sandwich, and Jack forces her to agree to his terms before rescuing her with the Heimlich maneuver.
After arranging for Louise to be cast as “Janet,” Jack writes “Rachel” off the show and looks forward to creating new narratives for the residents of “Ashford Falls.”
The film ends with Jack and Louise going ice skating in Central Park as the end credits roll.
It's...Groundhog Day! Only This Time, The Master Of Comedy, John Candy... MovieAddict20164 December 2002
John Candy made this film. The story involves a soap opera writer (Candy) who gets knocked out, and enters his own, type-written, created world, where all the characters are alive and playing their roles - or so he thinks. They are actually living them. So, Candy finds that whatever he writes on the 'ol typewriter happens in the world he's in, because, after all, he created it on the typewriter, right? Built off the same foundation as "Groundhog Day," Delirious is by no means great, and not John Candy's best, (I give that to Planes, Trains and Automobiles) but it does have an actual soap opera feel to it - that cheap feel - and has some laughs along the way. Not great, but worth watching. Candy was one of the best comedians of his time, God rest his soul... John "Candy" Ulmer
A final conclusion
Take a moment and watch the movie if you want some pointers on how the Affirmation Prayer Campaign operates. It’s an old silly comedy, but yeah… this is the way that it works.
There is nothing wrong with reaching for the wildest and craziest dreams, but keep in mind that the further away they are from your reality, the more world-lines you must traverse to reach them. In addition, there will always be discomfort with change. And many people do not like a great deal of discomfort in their life.
There are techniques that you can use to mitigate the effects of everything, but in all cases be calm, consistent, and steady. And whatever you do, do not write out your affirmations with spelling errors like the guy did in the movie. Yikes!
Good luck you all.
Do you want more?
I have more posts in my Movie Index here…
MOVIES.
Articles & Links
Master Index.
- You can start reading the articles by going HERE.
- You can visit the Index Page HERE to explore by article subject.
- You can also ask the author some questions. You can go HERE to find out how to go about this.
- You can find out more about the author HERE.
- If you have concerns or complaints, you can go HERE.
- If you want to make a donation, you can go HERE.
.
MM , i saw on the main page your text about keeping our affirmations simple and about safety and comfort.
This has been something I was planning on anyway , since your post about course corrections.
I havent done the things you mention in that post mainly because i’m Afraid I might lose things in my life that are dear to me.
After thinking my affirmations over I am planning on this:
Prayers for safety , good finances , good relationships and good health for my family, friends, you, my fellow MM and myself.
Another affirmation about that each of us keeps things in our lives that our conscioussnesses consider good. This one I want to keep in my campaign as a way to perhaps get rid of undesireable things without losing things we find dear to us.
My thinking behind this is that now automatically bad and undesireable things drift away smoothly.
Because i will now be moving to world lines with the good things and the longer i do that the more i will be surrounded by those world lines and those then act as “buffers” from bad world lines. So question: what do you think about my suggestion vs what you suggested in your course correction post.
Am I missing something important?
Or is my way perhaps, dare I say it, easier and better. No disrespect ofcourse.
Another thing. You mention dont make spelling errors. But I remember from a previous post that you said that the words dont really matter. Its the intention that counts. Its in your post about when having trouble writing new affirmations. Could you elaborate?
Personal I did stick to wording my prayers very very carefully.
In the movie Tom Candy wanted to write “you couldn’t hear a peep”, but was drunk and wrote “boo couldn’t shear a sheep”, and suddenly found a bunch of ghouls and ghosts trying to shear sheep in the hotel lobby. (Or something along those lines. It’s been decades since I watched the movie.) Well, yes, it’s the thoughts that count, but the verbal affirmations are the physical components that makes things happen.
You MUST be accurate and precise in what you say and write.
Remember. It’s two components working together to manifest our desires. [1] When we are in wave form we are thinking and generating thoughts. That’s all that happens. [2] When we cycle into particle form, it is what we are saying and writing, creatively that manifests what we want to happen. It’s not the other way around.
People do NOT think, and talk at the same time. They THINK in wave form, and they perform ACTION in particle form. Keep in mind the sine waveform of world-line travel.
You CANNOT separate the two aspects.
Thanks for clearing that up.
And what do you think about my plan to only pray for safety and such?
To use your own example of wanting to get rid of your Miami vice desires. And just to illustrate a point, i’m Going to assume that you dont want to have the Miami vice world lines popping up in your life anymore because they are to hectic now for your taste.
So you did what you outlined in that post to prevent yourself from moving to those worldlines.
But what if you had done the following:
Now if you would only have prayed for a calm life those Miami vice world lines would at first be a million lines to your left. Just as an example that is. After your second campaign you wil have surrounded yourself with more calm worldlines So automatically hectic worldlines will be even further from every world line. Lets just say its now 1.5 million. And after every campaign they are further and further. Until they are somewere were even if you stopped praying completely , they are So far that you’ll not be alive anymore when they would theoretically show up.
Correct?
So why do it my way instead of yours. Well im afraid that your way only works if you’re an expert like yourself.
And that myself and other readers might remove things from our past which we dont want to get rid of.
I apologize if my text comes across as too simple. I feel it takes up way too much space if I added all the nuances on everything.
Thanks in advance.
Oh my goodness! I am an expert in only ONE area. That is myself. Nothing else.I think that your methodology sounds quite excellent, and I strongly recommend that you proceed with it and follow it through to it’s conclusions.
The BIG PROBLEM is when we want to change our life but have no “real world” knowledge about it. To use the “Miami Vice” example, it is a fictional representation from televisions. Not the reality. In the 1980’s much of Florida was rural orange growers with a real Mayberry RFD feel to it, and the cities on the coasts were filled with SA folk, Cubans and retired people. When you fill your mind with these bullshit images that overlay the reality, you will often get a jumble of confusion with all sorts of side-issues cropping up and causing havoc in your life.
There are some people in Africa that are trying to change their lives around today. They are using this technique and imaging what they think is reality, when it is something quite different. In fact it is really very different than what they think, and in their efforts to slide to that pre-determined world-line template, they “opened up a real problem” and now they are dealing with all sorts of changes, discomforts and other issues that they are at a loss as to what to do. Some are really willing to “throw it all away and bail out” and move somewhere else. Yikes!
If you are in that situation, then scrub the plan. Go back to the start. [1] Reset your world-line template back to your pre-birth template. [2] Then, add moderate changes in the BASICS. Better housing, better relationships, better money, better health. And no stress in your life. [3] Fix those affirmations in place by at least three sequential campaigns. Then, you can start adding things slowly. And what ever you do, DO NOT USE a preconceived image of what is going on to guide you. Instead ask that you be given direction (in your affirmations, you add it as a affirmation) as to to be shown the direction to chart your world-line path out with.
Very big thanks big Dog for this.
One more thing.
Can you lose people that are close to you when resetting things. Or are close relationships exempt from changes.
Yes you can, and nothing is off limits. But that being said, you must keep in mind that the inertia that you build up through relationships are not easily dissipated.
Does that include for example that you could end up not having your kids or no brother because you prayed for something in the past to be different. Or can we only change paths from our current line.
I know you and lynne mctaggert said you can pray to change the past but I assumed you just move to a worldline where it SEEMS like you changed the past.
But you didnt. The past was a fixed line and your current life is another fixed line.
I can see that you are confused. There are two pasts, always.
[1] There is YOUR personal past. It is what you personally experienced. In my case, my personal past is one that had automats, breakfasts with baked beans instead of potatoes, and where chartreuse is a burgundy reddish-pink color.
[2] There is the past of the world-line that you are part of in any given moment. Right now, most of my world-lines have McDonalds with two golden arches, a past where Ronald Regan only had two terms, and where everyone eats eggs with hash-browns for breakfast.
Each and every world-line comes with it’s own past, and it’s own future. But your’s is quite different. Your past is a tabulated listing of your experiences that you have been exposed to, and your future will be the result of your thoughts.
That being said, the answer is yes. You could possibly enter a slide where your Aunt dies in a car crash, (Like in the movie and story, the Lathe of Heaven), and where there was a global pandemic ten years ago that killed 80% of the population. Though, I will tell you that those are really extreme slides. If you do end up on one, the influences on your consciousness will also be extreme as well, and you might end up getting all sorts of mental and physical problems as a result of them. You are never a simple observer, but rather you are always a participant when you are present in a world-line.
Having my own “experienced” past I understand. That’s the one where I build up my quanta.
I also understand that the world line im in has its own past.
But are you saying I could change something in my past were for example I never met my now ex wife and therefore I would all of a sudden end up without my daughter? Thats what im afraid of.
Yes, you could do that. But it’s unlikely. That is because you have entanglements with all things from YOUR past.
Which is relationships and other attachments.
It’s one thing to have a past where all McDonald’s have silver ashtrays, but no longer do (because smoking is banned on this world-line), but it’s another thing entirely to have a relationship with a wife, and children and pets who suddenly disappear. That change… having strong quantum entanglements that suddenly are gone, can theoretically happen, but in my experience will not. So do not worry about that.
Thanks very much for this. I really appreciate it. You’re in my prayers.