We are just a group of retired spooks that discuss things that you’ll not find anywhere else. It makes us unique. Take a look around. Learn a thing or two.
For those of you who worry about Taiwan, and the collapsing US Empire taking over or suppressing integrated chip manufacture. Take note.
China already holds the undisputed leadership in quantum supremacy with not one, but two complete separate computers. One using light and the other superconducting circuits, performing computational feats unattainable for traditional computing.
China has developed two different quantum computers, one that uses light and the other superconducting circuits, and obtained a computing power unattainable for traditional computing, as explained in two articles published in Physical Review Letters.
That means that this dual system of quantum computing gives China the ability to solve practical problems that can not be implemented on conventional computers, stands to respect PhysicsWorld.
With this result, China is already much more than an economic power: together with its energy developments with the artificial sun, it has also entered the “space race” of the 21st century with force, with different projects oriented to Mars and the Moon.
Except... that it is the ONLY nation in this race. The rest of the world are arguing whether to drive to the racetrack or walk.
Pioneers in quantum information
The new quantum computers have been developed by two groups from the Hefei National Laboratory of Physical Sciences, China University of Science and Technology, led by Professor Jian-Wei Pan, whose work has been highlighted in the past, both by the journal Nature and Science, as a pioneer in experimental quantum information science.
Last July, China announced that it had achieved quantum supremacy with a supercomputer called the Zuchongzhi, capable of performing operations much, much, MUCH faster than Google’s quantum computer.
Zuchongzhi completed a complex calculation in just over an hour, doing it about 60,000 times faster than a classic computer: Using 56 qubits, he solved in just 1.2 hours a task that would take a classic supercomputer eight years.
Two new quantum computers
China now emerges with a new quantum computer, which it calls Zuchongzhi 2.1 , which uses 66 qubits and is 10 million times faster than the current fastest supercomputer: its computational complexity is more than 1 million times greater than the Sycamore processor. of Google.
It also emerges with another quantum supercomputer, which it calls Jiuzhang 2.0 , that uses light to process information, rather than the superconducting circuits that underpin Zuchongzhi 2.1. “Jiuzhang 2.0”, with 113 photons transmitting qubits, is a septillion times more powerful: it can solve in a millisecond an operation that the fastest computer in the world would take 30 billion years.
This second development also represents quite a feat over the previous version of this same quantum computing system based on light, the “Jiuzhang”, presented at the end of 2020 and with which 76 qubit transmitting photons were used.
Quantum supremacy
With these developments, China consolidates its global quantum advantage and confirms that quantum computers are much more powerful and efficient than classical computers in solving critical problems.
Classical computers are based on the binary system, in which each symbol constitutes a bit, the minimum unit of information in this system, which can only have two values (zero or one).
These classic computers have managed to increase their power through supercomputers, which appeared in the 70s of the last century.
These supercomputers, better known as high-performance computers , base their extraordinary capabilities (measured in petaflops) on the sum of powerful binary computers linked together to increase their working power and performance.
Another universe
Quantum computing belongs to another universe: it uses a completely different and superior basic unit of information called the qubit.
The qubit, unlike the bit, can take several values at the same time, that is, it manifests a quantum system with two simultaneous eigen states.
While the bit takes on values of 0 or 1 in groups of 8,16,32 or 64 bits, the measurement in qubits can be in both states of 0 and 1 simultaneously, giving you the ability to perform unreachable operations to binary computing.
Quantum supremacy is achieved when it is shown that a qubit-based computer can solve something that is not available to binary computers, even if they are very sophisticated.
Double supremacy
Although it has been claimed in the past that quantum supremacy has already been achieved, and became a battleground between IBM and Google, China has overtaken both with far more powerful developments that, according to Physics magazine, give it no place. to doubt the real and verified quantum supremacy.
And not only that, but it has achieved it by following two different and parallel paths that fortify its supremacy: that of light and that of superconducting circuits.
Physics highlights that it is very difficult for classical algorithms and computers to improve China’s quantum advantages, so we can say that the debate on whether quantum supremacy really exists has concluded.
Useful Supremacy?
And the magazine concludes: Given that quantum machines solve such large and impressive problems in a way that far surpasses classical simulators, could we use these quantum computers to solve useful computational problems?
Researchers have claimed that these quantum computers can tackle important problems, particularly in the field of quantum chemistry, but no convincing experimental demonstration has yet been reported in the West.
You can rest assured that it is ongoing, or has already been conduced, inside of China.
You can find more articles related to this in my latest index; A New Beginning. And in it are elements of the old, some elements regarding the transition, and some elements that look towards the future.
This is a subject that I have covered tangentially in other articles. I have argued that when America was “off shoring” it’s manufacturing to Asia, it was doing more than losing jobs. It was destroying industries, evaporating engineering and design knowledge, and devastating the ability to conduct engineering efforts at all levels. Today we see this. We see bridges collapsing in Florida, and spending $77,000,000,000,000 to build a high speed rail line that only has 15 miles of track and a cardboard mock-up of a train. This article is pretty good in that it also covers this subject, though with some inherent biases, that I quickly correct. All in all it’s a pretty great read.
Please give it the attention that it deserves…
This is a complete reprint of the article titled “Can We If We May?” with a sub-heading of “America has lost engineering capabilities China now demonstrates.” written by Will Offensicht on February 20, 2020 . This reprint is written as found with minor editing to fit within this venue and my own personal opinions interjected at obvious points.
…and many other examples where our government says “You may not do that even if you can, not even if sensible people think you should.”
The Danger of Over Regulation
Although Mr. Trump’s tax cut understandably receives the lion’s share of credit for the current economic boom, his taking an ax to as many regulations as he can also deserves major kudos.
The leftist media “fact checkers” like to cast his claims of red-tape-slashing as a lie; perhaps he hasn’t actually eliminated 22 regulations for every new one created, but there’s no doubt he’s killed off far more than he originated.
It’s interesting that the media chooses to castigate him for under-destroying regulations, when they generally believe more regulation is always an unmixed Good Thing.
In fact, the opposite is more generally true as regulations rapidly reach the point of diminishing returns.
Taxes are more or less predictable. Even though tax rules are made insanely complicated to offer maximum opportunity for politicians to help their friends escape paying their “fair share,” taxes on a business venture change seldom and are more or less predictable.
Regulations, however, are not predictable and can change at any time.
We’ve explained how a politician abused the regulatory agencies to keep a new restaurant from opening even after the would-be entrepreneur had followed all the rules. Regulations cause uncertainty which quashes innovation as well as entrepreneurship. That’s why we believe that Mr. Trump’s whacking back regulatory kudzu deserves equal credit for his boom if not more.
Having dealt at length with the “May not” effect of regulations and
knowing that many of our readers have noticed that Mr. Trump’s
chopping back red tape has had good economic effect, we thought we
should switch to the “Can” question of whether we’re able to make
timely investments that will boost growth or enhance public safety.
Can We?
Part of our ranting against regulations was because we had seen that it now takes decades to do anything constructive, where in time past mere months sufficed.
The planning process to rebuild Highway 30 in Colorado took 14 years. It took longer to build the 9-11 victim monument – basically a hole in the ground with a roof – than it took to build the entire towering World Trade Center in the first place.
We reported that back in the early 1970s, the head of power generation at Consolidated Edison, the PG&E of New York, estimated that he could build a power generation plant in 9 months if everyone got out of the way, whereas he couldn’t built it at all under the then-current regulatory regime.
We remember that when an earthquake destroyed a number of California highway overpasses, the governor told the bureaucrats to get out of the way and the highway was fixed in 1/10 the time expected. We have always assumed that Americans could get things done if the regulations were cut back.
Recent events, however, have led us to
re-think that.
They Can!
When the seriousness of the current coronavirus outbreak in Wuhan was recognized, the Chinese threw up a 1,000 bed hospital in 6 days.
Correction. They built two (x2) new hospitals, not one. Additionally they added completely new and refurbished a number of existing hospital in Wuhan... all within ten days.
-Metallicman
This beat the previous 10-day record, set by a 1,000 bed Beijing hospital erected during the SARS epidemic of 2003. YouTube has any number of videos showing how it was done from a height, but the details are even more impressing.
Both of these hospitals were built using prefabricated units which were trucked to the site and dropped in place. Turning prefab shells into a hospital sounds easy, but is actually anything but simple, considering that this is intended as a top-flight isolation hospital for highly contagious plagues.
For example, Siemens China boasted that their team wired up the entire hospital in 38 hours, a project which, they said, would normally take three weeks.
Hospital wiring is complicated, requiring many
carefully-separated ground circuits so that stray voltage doesn’t get
into ICU probes where a small amount of extra current can kill a sick
patient. Wiring normally comes after air ducts and after
plumbing,
because wiring conduits are easiest to bend in case some other
installer put something in the wrong place.
Unless the drawings are done extremely carefully and followed with equal care, these tasks can’t be done in parallel because something will interfere with something else and gum up the schedule.
Getting all this done in such a short time indicates organizational and construction skills of an extremely high order – the sort of thing Germans were once famous for, and which Americans used to do routinely, but which we rarely if ever see nowadays.
Electricity Isn’t The Trickiest Problem
Difficult as hospital wiring is, the real problem is the air handling
system given that the purpose of the hospital is to treat up to 1,000
patients
suffering from a virus that spreads easily through the air.
To start with, patients
have to be kept in rooms where the air pressure is slightly below
outside air pressure so that the virus doesn’t escape. But that
alone isn’t enough, because you don’t want the victims catching things
from
each other. So each room must be kept separate from every other
room – not to mention the hallways, access spaces, and so on.
Naturally, any air pulled out of isolation wards must be exhausted
to the outside through
filters that trap viruses, which are very small. Doing
this for 1,000 rooms requires world-class air management on a grand
scale.
We know how critical air handling is from the saga of the
Diamond
Princess, a cruise ship that’s been in quarantine in Yokohama
harbor
in Japan since Feb. 3. One
80-year-old Chinese passenger from
Hong Kong had boarded
the ship in Yokohama at the start of the voyage. The ship called
at
Hong Kong and passengers went ashore, mixing with the general
population of that very crowded city.
By the time the ship got back to Yokohama, the Hong Kong passenger was
suffering from what looked like a severe flu. Japanese
authorities knew about the virus and
wouldn’t let anyone off the ship. There were 61 cases by Feb. 7,
showing either that the Hong Kong sufferer was a “super spreader” or
that many passengers had been exposed when they went ashore in Hong
Kong or when gathering in communal spaces on the ship.
Among the 3,711 passengers and crew there have been at least 542
confirmed cases, giving the ship the highest infection rate in the
world at 14% of the available population. If that infection rate
holds in crowded places like
Wuhan or Hong Kong, the epidemic will be serious indeed.
Although quarantining people on the ship seemed like a good idea
at the time, we now know that the virus spreads well through a ship’s
air circulation system. Just about all of the crew and
many
low-budget passengers were in rooms without portholes, so they
depended on air circulated through the ship’s ducts – which, of course,
were never designed for virus-rated filters.
We’ve expressed skepticism of plague statistics coming out of China, but as the number of cases and reported deaths have climbed, fatalities have always come out at around 2%, either by accident or by design. If 14% of a general population get the disease and 2% of those infected die, .028% of the population will die.
A Dose of Opinion.
One of the things that I have learned since I moved to China, was how wrong my Alt-Right beliefs were regarding China.
I had, over the five previous decades pretty much accepted the anti-China narrative that has saturated the American media. Most of which is designed for consumption by people who have never put foot inside of China, and thus view China using the same kinds of glasses that we all view America.
One of the narratives is that China routinely fabricates false data.
Don't roll your eyes. Hear me out for a fucking minute.
Nonsense.
Maybe they did so in the past. I know that Mr. Mao was a big fan of lying. I also know that the shedding away of his Marxist utopia came at a great cost. All you need to do is look at the photos of the 1960's and 1970's to see what all his lies were covering up.
But not today.
Today it's another "ballgame".
They do not lie, because they do not need to.
So they just tell you what it is, right or wrong. you can take it or leave it. They don't give a flying fuck what you think. No one is going to protest, complain or do anything. So they just tell you the truth.
America on the other hand, must lie because popular opinion is what drives a "democracy". So America lies all the time...
The greatest employment jobs number ever! The GDP is now at 1.5% it is mind-mindbogglingly amazing! I did not have sex with that woman! If you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor.
China doesn't have to lie.
"Hey, we closed all your bank accounts, and seized your money. We also black listed you on social media, and are welding your apartment doors shut. But you are still alive. Let's keep it that way good citizen."
The Chinese government can do whatever it wants. But lie? Nah. They have no need to.
-Metallicman
On the basis of past experience with SARS, the British health service estimates that 60% will get the disease. If they’re right and the 2% fatality rate holds, that means 1.2% of the British population will die.
What’s worse, it’s not clear that recovering from this flu gives immunity – there are reports that a patient recovered, caught the flu, or a slight mutation, again, and died.
Some Clarity.
The COVID-19 virus has mutated, and there are at least two strains. They are "S" and "L". People who have caught the least dangerous strain and recovered, then ended up getting the more aggressive strain and dying. It's a binary double-punch virus...
A man who was discharged from one of the makeshift hospitals built to contain the coronavirus outbreak in Wuhan, China, has reportedly died from respiratory failure, raising questions about the longevity of the COVID-19 virus and the unknowns about re-infection.
The 36-year-old man had been discharged with instructions to stay in a quarantine hotel, but returned to a hospital after five days, where he later died, according to the South China Morning Post, which reported that the man’s death certificate listed his cause of death as COVID-19.
The news comes on the heels of a report from the Japanese government that a woman from Osaka tested positive for the coronavirus for a second time.
“I think it’s something that we need to know more about,” said John Connor of Boston University’s National Emerging Infectious Disease Laboratories. “This is something that needs to be watched and people that have become infected and are feeling better should probably be aware of if they begin to get sick again.”
–Boston Herald
-Metallicman
Since “only” 14% of the Diamond Princess population have tested positive, we can expect a lot more illness among that group if British estimates are correct. In that case, the incubation period is a lot longer than the current two week guesstimate.
Many people who were released from quarantine after two weeks will have been spreading the virus and it won’t be possible to keep it out of the general population.
In any case, we hope that the air handler engineers in Wuhan did a
truly
world-class job in their new hospital. We’ll find out! But
the fact that the hospital even appears
to be up and running in 6 days is awe-inspiring indeed.
Suppose it Really
Mattered?
We’ve
noted that trivia such as environmental
impact statements and property rights are non-issues in China.
The
Party says “Put it there,” and that’s where it goes. Complainers
go
to jail or disappear.
Commentary.
That is correct, which is why the Alt-Right narratives about the "Chicoms" is just fabricated bullshit. They don't need approval from anyone. They do not have polls, or rely on public opinion. They do their own thing, and opinions be dammed.
Plus, the Chinese are hyper-patriotic. They don't need to kill a percentage of their population to end "starvation" or "over crowding". They would just play some patriotic music and people would line up to voluntarily die for their nation.
-Metallicman
It’s impossible to do that in America. When Mr. Trump declared a national emergency so that our military could build a wall on our southern border, people who didn’t want the wall went to court and blocked part of it.
No Chinese would be so unpatriotic, or foolish, as to question a national emergency decreed from On High.
Suppose, as a thought experiment, that somehow we really got
everybody out of the way –
environmental, legal, financial, safety, NIMBY, every other obstacle –
and told some organization like the Army Engineers to Get It Done
Yesterday! Could we build a
hospital to the standards needed to contain this disease in that short
a time?
A truly motivating emergency isn’t that hard to imagine – nobody
wants to die from the
plague, and the military owns vast tracts of empty land subject to
nothing but federal law and the Commander-in-Chief. If the
coronavirus were to take hold here as in Wuhan, we fully
expect The Donald to sign just such an executive order, to the massed
applause of worried voters.
Unfortunately, that wouldn’t be enough to actually get the hospital
built in 6 days, or even 6 months.
Unlike the Chinese, we don’t have standard hospital plans – have you
ever seen two American hospitals that looked even remotely alike?
We certainly have no factories
churning out prefabricated units that could be assembled into a
hospital.
The British can’t do it either, which is why they’re
saying people will have to self-quarantine if the virus breaks
out.
Could our engineers work
out designs to knock together hospitals like Legos? Sure… eventually, by which time it would
be far too late.
Let’s look at something simpler, like making 10-cent
disposable masks
used to stop the virus from spreading through the air.
The South China Morning
Postdescribes mask production in China:
China, which accounts for about half of the world's mask production, is scrambling to snap excess supply from overseas, both through official diplomatic channels, and buyers like Cai [who travels to pharmacies and buys up all the masks he can find].
Demand for masks has surged in recent weeks, exhausting not just China's stockpile, but emptying shelves from Bangkok to Boston. In China, it is now mandatory to wear facial masks in public areas in many cities.
Chinese mask makers are currently operating at 76 per cent capacity, which puts daily production at 15.2 million masks based on the industry's reported capacity to produce 20 million pieces a day, Cong Liang, an NDRC official, said at a press conference in Beijing on Tuesday.
Daily demand, however, is estimated to be between 50 and 60 million units during the outbreak, according to Chinese media reports citing mainland mask manufacturers. [emphasis added]
Daily demand in China is now 2 or 3 times their maximum production capacity. They won't be able to make it up by grabbing the rest of the world's mask production because any nation that can make masks will keep them. Could they make more?
Not to worry: they're slapping together a new mask factory in under a week.
They
clearly know how to make
machines to make masks and they can raid their garment industry to
assemble armies of seamstresses to make them by hand. How many
masks could one sweatshop employee sew in a 12-hour day when motivated
by a credible threat of very unpleasant deaths for all their friends
and relatives?
Some thoughts.
Obviously this writer has never been to China. You do not need to threaten anyone. They would willingly come to do what ever is necessary to help their nation.
-Metallicman
In a way, this is even more impressive than the 6-day
hospital. China is home to around 1.5 billion people, and up
until very recently they had very few modern hospitals if any at
all. Even
without the coronavirus, they had every reason to expect tens of
thousands of new hospitals to be needed in the coming years.
One of
the advantages of an all-powerful central government is that it can
easily standardize things. Clearly, some Communist Party official
led a team designing “Standard Hospital Models A-F,” distributed the
plans, and set up “The
People’s Hospital Factory” to crank them out. They’re just
turning the crank harder these days, is all.
Some Clarity.
Nope. It doesn't work that way. What? Do all the buildings in Beijing, Shanghai, and Guangzhou all look the same? No they do not. Stop confusing North Korea with China. It makes you all look like ignorant fools.
-Metallicman
Nobody would have anticipated the need for a factory that mass-produces masks, yet they’ve managed to wave the wand and create those too. How long will it be before they meet their needs and are willing to resume mask exports?
Our population is about 1/4 of China’s. Could we
make 15 million masks per day to supply our needs if daily masking was
required for a similar fraction of our population?
Google believes that Americans manufacture 27.4 billion disposable
diapers per year. Masks take less material, but leaks and hidden
defects
are fatal as opposed to merely inconvenient.
We’d need on the order of 7 billion masks per year. The
experts
at
Procter and Gamble could probably retool a diaper machine to make
masks, but
how long would it take? How many masks could one re-purposed
diaper machine make in a day? Could they rebuild a machine or
make a custom mask maker in 10
days? Probably not – and then we’d have a diaper shortage, which
isn’t a good idea if half the country is sick with the flu.
What if everybody in
America needed one every day? 350 million masks per day is nearly
130
billion masks per year, far more than our 27 billion diapers. Not
a chance.
There Was a Time
There was a time when we could grind things out. Every one of our
soldiers
who
fought in WW II remembered the Great Depression, during which everyone
had to make do with whatever they had. They had to learn to
tinker,
to “Use it up. Wear it out. Make it do, or do without.”
Google wasn’t around during WW II, so it doesn’t remember the story
of an Air Force general demanding that Douglas aircraft install a
radar on a bomber in 90 days. The boss tried to stall, “We’ll
need
a plane,” “My guys just landed one at your field,” the
general said. “They’ll leave you the keys.” The job got
done.
We’ve lost that ethos. We no longer have a well-developed culture
of
tinkering. Instead of learning to tweak cars as the
previous
generation of teenagers did, kids play video games.
We aren’t really prepared for the mass mobilization of building
hospitals and making all the medical bunny suits that will be
needed to replace shipments from China if the virus breaks out into our
population. We don’t live
that way, we don’t think that way, and we certainly don’t work that way
– because over the decades, bureaucracy has made sure we can’t.
The Chinese are better positioned to crank out whatever they need to
fight the virus. This is one of the few situations in which an
undemocratic central government can be enormously more effective than a
sclerotic democracy answerable to whichever people are screaming
loudest.
What’s more, the Chinese can lose a lot more people without their
civilization falling apart, if for no other reason than that they have a lot more people to start
with. Within living memory, their government intentionally murdereda huge fraction of the Chinese people, far more
than the virus is on track to do – and yet their government and
civilization, such as
it was, soldiered on.
Historical Correction.
Yup. That's the American narrative. And it's not that off. But, the deaths came from the "Cultural Revolution" with saw 30 million people die for the progressive Marxist cause. This deeply affected China, and resulted in a complete overhaul of many aspects of progressive thought in China.
-Metallicman
So from the standpoint of societal resiliency, China has already been tried and passed the test of surviving a plague of death-dealing human beings. No virus could possibly match that.
Conclusion
It’s not just that the factory workers were unemployed, it was the technical folk as well. This is the designers, the draftsmen, the CAD operators, the systems integrators, the quality folk, the manufacturing engineers and the production engineers. Not to mention the equipment, the structures and the tools to make all the gizmos and things that are so readily manufactured in China today.
The clueless in Washington somehow believe that they can snap a few fingers and suddenly a factory will spring up in a wheat-field organically just by proclaiming that “it be so”. Who’s gonna operate it? Who’s going to set the production lines, work, and modify the machines?
A “Diversity Director”?
America is paying the price of sloth. American citizens should have butch-slapped President Wilson and all his cronies back to the Middle Ages where they belong. But we didn’t. We let the cut fester and rot, until now they are a cancer that is taking America to Hell.
Rah Rah Rah all you fucking want. America is nothing what it should be and it’s all our fault.
America is trying to claw itself out from a mess that it created. That’s what all of this is. The bigger the domestic mess, the greater the risk of America getting into a long bloody war to take people’s mind off their problems.
Buckle Up.
I hope that you enjoyed this article. I have others in my China posts index here…
You’ll not find any big banners or popups here talking about cookies and privacy notices. There are no ads on this site (aside from the hosting ads – a necessary evil). Functionally and fundamentally, I just don’t make money off of this blog. It is NOT monetized. Finally, I don’t track you because I just don’t care to.
Please kindly help me out in this effort. There is a lot of effort that goes into this disclosure. I could use all the financial support that anyone could provide. Thank you very much.