China is a traditional nation that has zero tolerance for progressive ideas or values. And we, within China, see this every day. This is a point that I have made time and time again, and have written various articles on this particular subject. And yet, we are reminded of this fact once again.
Here's a great article. All credit to the original author. Republished from National Justice. Edited to fit this venue.
China: Nationalists Smash Cyber Network of Feminists and Foreign Backed Social Justice Warriors
A cyber army of nationalists have successfully shut down a network of feminists and American-style leftists on Weibo, the Chinese equivalent of Twitter.
More than a dozen prominent accounts belonging to purple haired women preaching homosexuality, hatred against men, and attacks on the traditional family were banned from the site for violating Weibo’s policy on promoting hate.
How it began…
The confrontation began when US supported Chinese feminist Xiao Meili posted a video.
It was a video of a woman harassing a random man for smoking a cigarette near a restaurant.
The man responded by throwing his drink in her face.
Meili attempted to paint the incident as a social indictment of Chinese men.
Instead online users swarmed her comments and began protesting her “xenocentrism”.
Xenocentrism is a term used against people attempting to import American and European Union values to China.
When several prominent Chinese “social justice warriors” rallied to her defense and accused the critics of “intimidating” her, the dispute spiraled into an all out cyber war.
The Result
Eventually, the feminists were all banned.
The banished accounts include women who…
- Promote sexual boycotts of men.
- That promote boycotts of marriage.
- Those that promote lesbianism.
- Those that attack the Confucian ethic of caring for the elderly.
- And those that engage in frivolous sexual harassment accusations.
Western Media are howling!
Western media is up in arms about the affair, blaming the Chinese government for having a role in “silencing” or “censoring” these women.
Article 35 of the Chinese constitution guarantees the right to free speech.
However, Weibo is a privately owned company, meaning that it wouldn’t even be censorship under American law.
The feminists have filed an impotent lawsuit against Weibo similar to ones filed by Americans against Silicon Valley monopolies in hopes of being reinstated.
“Free Speech” or CIA sponsored NGO “Color Revolutions”?
“Human rights” groups, US/European controlled media, and NGOs attempting to spur a political response for merely banning users engaged in what the Chinese perceive as hate speech contradicts their position on online speech in America.
Every powerful institution in the West supports ruthlessly suppressing pro-normal beliefs in America and Europe, including affirming that men cannot be transformed into women through drugs and mutilation.
As politicians, corporations and feminist activists in the United States like to remind us, the right to free speech is not a right to a platform.
Traditional Values within China
Under Xi Jinping, the Chinese government has sought to avoid a looming demographic winter by increasing national birth rates.
Defending the dignity of the traditional Chinese family, which includes a husband, a wife, children and often older relatives, has been made a national priority by president Xi.
This embrace of tradition is a drastic departure from Mao Zedong’s Marxist campaign to “liberate” women from marriage and force them to go to work instead.
Conclusion
China is quickly becoming a photo-negative of America.
- Billionaires who try to exert political influence have their monopolies busted instead.
- Anti-social people are bullied and humiliated.
- Chinese manhood is celebrated.
- The Han majority is taught to be proud of their race rather than ashamed of it.
History will soon decide which civilization model is superior.
- America’s oligarchy-ruled military-empire under the guise of “democracy”, or
- China’s “Traditional Familial Society with communist characteristics”.
Do you want more?
I have more posts in my China Index here…
China.
Articles & Links
Master Index.
You’ll not find any big banners or popups here talking about cookies and privacy notices. There are no ads on this site (aside from the hosting ads – a necessary evil). Functionally and fundamentally, I just don’t make money off of this blog. It is NOT monetized. Finally, I don’t track you because I just don’t care to.
- You can start reading the articles by going HERE.
- You can visit the Index Page HERE to explore by article subject.
- You can also ask the author some questions. You can go HERE to find out how to go about this.
- You can find out more about the author HERE.
- If you have concerns or complaints, you can go HERE.
- If you want to make a donation, you can go HERE.
Please kindly help me out in this effort. There is a lot of effort that goes into this disclosure. I could use all the financial support that anyone could provide. Thank you.
.
A comparison between the US (the West, really) and China on such topics as marriage, divorce, child support, and family laws would be interesting. Feminists have turned man-woman relationships in the West into a loaded minefield.
No-fault divorce made it possible for either spouse to dissolve the marriage over the other spouse’s objections, then for the one breaking the contract to claim cash and prizes from the other. Women initiate 70% of all no-fault divorces in the US. Splitting assets afterward often favors the woman with well over the nominal 50% of everything; look into some professional athletes’ divorce settlements here, where the ex-wife got as much as 80% of assets.
Family courts routinely award children after a divorce to the mother, regardless of fitness, and require the man to pay often disproportionate child support. Despite feminism and women routinely working outside the home, alimony is still awarded in many states, even when the wife initiated the divorce (thereby rewarding breaking the marriage contract). Often alimony is incredibly high.
Now these concepts are being applied to cohabitating couples. Canada, Australia, and Britain have gone down that path. Shack up at your peril.
None of this gets into the rabid man-hating going on in university campuses and the like, of course.
Those are quick examples to avoid making the post too lengthy. Based on this blog entry, my point is that I suspect the rules are completely different in China. MM, could you elaborate in a future post?
Interesting subject matter. I’ll jot it down on my “things to do list”. But you know, most Americans don’t want to hear the truth about China; that it more resembles a 1950’s American society. They want to hear of goosestepping police state. Yada Yada.