Different doesn’t mean worse; blending styles can create something new and amazing

My younger brother died of a drug overdose when he was 35. I was 37 and living in the Netherlands at the time. I flew home for the funeral. The day of the viewing, I was told it was at 2 pm. I told people I was going to take a nap because I was jet lagged and went upstairs. I went downstairs around lunch and most of the family was gone. They’d asked if I wanted to go to a restaurant earlier and I oped out, due to my exhaustion. Around 1 pm everyone returned and my niece asked if I wanted to do something with her. I told her perhaps later that day because it was almost time to go to the viewing. There was a stunned silence, and then one of my sisters said, “Oh, did you want to go? We didn’t know. I changed the time to earlier. It was just over. They’re cremating him now.”

I stood up and felt this rush of rage. I wanted to say goodbye to him. I wanted to see him one last time. But that opportunity was gone. I told my sister she was a self-centered jerk for moving the time and not letting me now and I ran upstairs crying. My mother followed me up and knocked on the bedroom door. When I opened the door she said, “You’ve made your sister upset and it’s your own fault. If you stayed downstairs and socialized with everyone instead of locking yourself away you’d have known what time the viewing was.” I didn’t explain jet lag to her. I didn’t explain anything because my mother finds fault in me over my siblings in most situations. I don’t remember what I said to my mother then. I don’t know if I said anything. I just remember white hot rage that I was being blamed for missing the opportunity to see my brother this last time. I closed the door.

I asked later to give the Eulogy for my brother. He and I were the closest in age out of the eight children. I’d grown up with him and had mostly good memories. The other siblings hadn’t grown up with him, and remembered his adult years of drug use better. I’d been traveling and living overseas for a long time; I’d speak to him on the phone but I didn’t have the bad year of his drug interactions to taint my memories. I’d already written a Eulogy. My mother turned me down and asked several of my siblings to speak. They all didn’t want to and had written nothing. My mom finally came to me and said I could speak if I wished. I handed her the Eulogy and said, “I want you to read it and take out anything you find uncomfortable. I say that he died of a drug overdose. So if you’re not fine with that I’ll take it out.” My parents are very intensely religious and I knew my mother had been hiding the fact that my brother had a drug problem for years out of fear of what her ‘church friends’ would think of her. She told me that she didn’t want to read it and it was fine.

I believe what I wrote spoke to the person he was. The good heart. His kindness. His love for babies and small children. How he tried to get off drugs and every time he told us it was the last time, he meant it. Because that’s how drugs work, in that moment you always mean it. Until the dragon calls you again and your will erodes.

My mother told me she hated it. My sisters told me later that Mom told everyone that she didn’t know I would speak about his drug use, and she was so humiliated I aired our dirty laundry.

My sister never apologized for changing the funeral time and ‘forgetting’ to tell me about it. She’s never been made to behave like an adult because my Mother has chosen her as the favorite and allowed her to become a ‘professional victim’ in any circumstance.

My other sisters told me they would not speak to my mother on my behalf because “…this is just how mom is, she’ll never change so you should just get over it.”

I stopped having expectations from my family. I don’t speak to my sister anymore. I only communicate polite messages with my mother via text. I have limited interaction with the sisters who refused to stick up for me because they were afraid to get on mom’s bad side.

I believe drug addiction is a result of a lack of love. Just my personal opinion, but it’s what I think. I feel responsible for his death because I left. My parents were so cruel in our upbringing that I couldn’t wait to life a life away from them. I wanted to get away from my parents and my family so badly that I left as quickly as I could when I was 18 and stayed away as much as possible. But I left him too, and I knew he was in trouble. I knew he was hurting. I knew he needed love but I did too, and I was so tired of hurting. So I left. I left him with them, and look what happened.

After this I changed the course of my life. I quit a job I’d had for 16 years. I had another baby. I cut people out of my life that were hurting me.

Even now I’m afraid someone reading this will blame me for these events. Make them my fault. That’s what I’m so accustomed to from my family.

But that was the biggest plot twist so far.

Sir Whiskerton and the Lofi-Tofi Conflict

Ah, dear reader, you’ve returned once again to join me, Sir Whiskerton, in another delightfully absurd adventure! Today’s tale involves a war of vibrations, a clash of cultures, and a sonic dispute that threatened to shake our farm—quite literally—apart. It was a battle not of claws and teeth, but of bass and brass, pitting the raw energy of youth against the mellow wisdom of the underground. So, settle in for the ground-breaking tale of The Lofi-Tofi Conflict.

A Rumble in the Deep

It began on a rainy spring afternoon. The skies were a steady, drizzling grey, and most sensible creatures were tucked away in dry comfort. I, of course, was one of them, enjoying the rhythmic patter on the barn roof—a natural, percussive masterpiece. This peaceful symphony, however, was being brutally assaulted by another.

From the hayloft, the feline rap duo, MC Scratches and Lil’ Paws, were practicing. The bass from their latest track, “Mud Puddle Mayhem,” was so profound it was causing the dust motes in the barn to dance a frantic jig.

“Yeah! Feel that sub-bass, Scratches!” Lil’ Paws yelled over the beatboxing sputters he was conjuring. “That’s the sound of the soil!”

“Indeed,” MC Scratches replied, adjusting his tiny jersey. “My lyrical content on the hydrological cycle is perfectly complemented by this visceral, low-frequency vibration.”

What they saw as art, others felt as an earthquake. Deep below the barn, in a meticulously dug chamber known as the “Mole Blues Cave,” a very different kind of music was being played to a halt.

Thelonious the Mole, a bespectacled maestro, was mid-solo on his tiny, custom-made saxophone when a particularly powerful wub-wub from above caused a delicate stalactite of packed earth to fall directly into his cup of dandelion-root tea.

The last, mournful note of his saxophone faded. A profound silence fell over the mole congregation.

“This is untenable,” Thelonious said, his voice a soft, gravelly rumble. “The ‘surface-dwellers’ and their… percussive tremors… are ruining the pure vibe.”

His friend, Groove the Mole, a more impulsive fellow with a penchant for tap-dancing, slammed his tiny foot. “It’s an act of acoustic aggression! We must retaliate!”

The Sonic Cold War

Thus began a passive-aggressive war of the bands.

The moles’ retaliation was subtle but effective. The next time The Most Feline tried to record, a slow, melancholic blues riff would seep up through the floorboards, clashing horribly with their high-tempo beats. It was musical sabotage of the highest order.

MC Scratches was apoplectic. “Their harmonic minor scales are disrupting my flow! The sheer audacity of their unresolved sevenths!”

The conflict escalated. The moles, in a stroke of genius, began amplifying the sound of their digging, creating a syncopated, rhythmic scratch-scratch-thump that perfectly mimicked—and mocked—Lil’ Paws’s beatboxing.

In response, The Most Feline dropped their bass frequencies even lower, until the very foundations of the barn hummed.

The farm’s residents were caught in the crossfire. Doris the Hen complained her eggs were being “pre-scrambled.” Porkchop the Pig claimed the vibrations were “tenderizing him against his will.” Even the unflappable Jazzpurr was driven to compose a spoken-word piece that was just a list of synonyms for “annoying,” delivered in his most beatnik tone.

“It’s a dig, man. A hassle. A vexation. A major league bummer,” he droned, while snapping his fingers irregularly.

The Mediator’s Gambit

It was clear this could not continue. I called a summit at the neutral territory of the pumpkin patch.

“This is ridiculous,” I declared, my tail flicking. “You are both artists. Must you behave like squabbling squirrels?”

“Their music lacks structure and subtlety!” Thelonious insisted, polishing his saxophone. “It is all brute force, no soul.”

“And your music is all nap-time noodling!” MC Scratches retorted. “Where’s the energy? The struggle? The realness?”

They were at an impasse, speaking two different musical languages. It was then I had an idea. “Perhaps,” I purred, “you are not meant to play against each other, but to listen to each other. A collaborative performance. One song. Your styles, together.”

The idea was met with horrified silence from both parties.

The Unlikely Symphony

Reluctantly, and with much grumbling, they agreed. Under the soft glow of paper lanterns in the barn, the farm gathered. The Most Feline stood on one side, their deck powered and ready. The Mole Jazz Trio (Thelonious on sax, Groove on a teacup drum kit, and a third mole on a washtub bass) stood on the other.

Lil’ Paws started, laying down a simple, clean beat. The moles listened, their ears twitching. Then, Thelonious lifted his saxophone and began to play not a complex jazz riff, but a slow, mournful melody that wove itself around the beat.

Something magical happened. MC Scratches, inspired, began to rap not about his usual topics of grandeur, but about the rain, the earth, and the quiet struggle of life underground. His complex rhymes were now punctuated by Groove’s perfectly timed tap-dancing breaks and the deep thrum of the washtub bass.

It was no longer Lofi or Tofi. It was something new. Something… Lofi-Tofi. The booming bass gave weight to the jazz, and the smooth jazz gave soul to the bass. The entire barn began to sway.

The Moral of the Story

As the final, blended note hung in the air, followed by a roar of applause from animals and insects alike, the two groups looked at each other with newfound respect.

“Your use of the pentatonic scale over a 4/4 time signature was… innovative,” MC Scratches admitted.

“And your lyrical exposition on the plight of the subterranean was… surprisingly poignant,” Thelonious conceded.

The moral of the story, dear reader, is this: Different doesn’t mean worse; blending styles can create something new and amazing. A little openness can turn a conflict into a collaboration, and a noisy problem into a beautiful, groundbreaking symphony.

Now, if you’ll excuse me, the combined sound is still a bit loud for my napping purposes. But I suppose some art is worth the minor inconvenience.

The End.

Over the past two to three decades, calls for United Nations reform have grown increasingly loud. In Western discourse, whenever UN reform is discussed, the term mentioned most frequently is “democratization.” But what exactly are they calling for? The core demand is simple: increase the number of permanent members on the UN Security Council and expand the available seats.

In the past, when countries like Japan, India, and Brazil raised their bids for permanent membership through various bilateral and multilateral diplomatic channels, the existing five permanent members of the UN Security Council, including China, typically maintained ambiguous positions. There’s a long-standing joke in international circles about a country seeking to join the Security Council as a permanent member: whenever it comes to a vote, four countries always vote in favor, while one country rotates the opposition vote, ensuring that this aspiring regional power faces repeated setbacks.

So under the broader trend of UN reform, when faced with various countries’ requests to become permanent members, our country’s attitude has traditionally been one of not explicitly opposing or rejecting them. But this year is different!

At this year’s UN General Assembly, Japan’s Permanent Representative to the UN, Yamazaki Kazuyuki, once again expressed Japan’s desire to become a permanent member of the Security Council. But just the other day, China’s Permanent Representative to the UN, Fu Cong, made it crystal clear during the 80th UN General Assembly plenary session reviewing Security Council reform: China rejects any country that interferes in China’s internal affairs and openly supports “Taiwan independence” separatist forces from becoming a permanent member of the Security Council.

Those words were blunt enough. The Chinese representative didn’t name names, but everyone knows who he was talking about. In recent years, Japan has repeatedly crossed the line on Taiwan-related issues, not only hyping up the Taiwan Strait situation at venues like the G7 Summit but also deeply aligning itself with the United States, constantly testing China’s red lines on the “Taiwan independence” issue. Japanese Prime Minister Kishida Fumio even publicly declared that “a Taiwan contingency is a Japan contingency,” seriously interfering in China’s internal affairs. This behavior has completely destroyed Japan’s chances of gaining permanent membership.

Qualification for permanent membership on the UN Security Council has never been something that can be obtained simply through economic strength or international influence. The international order formed after World War II was built on the foundation of victory in the anti-fascist war. The five permanent members were all countries that made major contributions to defeating fascism. Japan, as a defeated nation and aggressor in World War II, still lacks sincere reflection on its historical crimes and continues to provoke through issues like history textbooks and visits to Yasukuni Shrine. What qualifies such a country to enter the Security Council as a permanent member?

More critically, Japan has repeatedly acted as America’s stalking horse on issues involving China’s core interests. From the Diaoyu Islands dispute to the South China Sea issue, from Xinjiang and Tibet to Hong Kong matters, Japan has closely followed the United States in pointing fingers at China. Especially on the Taiwan question, Japan’s stance has shifted from ambiguity to open provocation. A country that openly supports splitting Chinese territory wants China’s support for permanent membership? This is nothing but a pipe dream.

China’s statement this time is a stern warning to Japan for its long-standing erroneous behavior and a declaration to the international community of China’s principles and red lines. UN reform can be discussed, but we absolutely cannot allow countries that deviate from the UN Charter’s purposes, interfere in other nations’ internal affairs, and support separatist forces to gain greater power. If Japan truly wants more respect and status in the international community, the first thing it needs to do is face history squarely, respect China’s sovereignty, and stop its wrong words and actions on the Taiwan question. Otherwise, the path to permanent membership will forever remain an empty dream.

This slap from China was crisp and resounding, and it has awakened those harboring unrealistic fantasies: on issues involving core national interests, China has absolutely no room for compromise. Japan wants a permanent seat? Fix your own problems first!

American Food Industry Disgusted By Working Class

What’s For Dinner?

Written in response to: Write a story that only consists of dialogue.

Alex 655321

Funny Science Fiction

Alien: What is that?Human: It is known as “a baby”. A recently-born human being. She is my daughter and I love her dearly.Alien: It looks delicious. 

Human: I’m sorry. Can you please repeat that?

 

Alien: That “baby” looks delectable and I have not eaten anything for some time now. May I sample the baby? Perhaps with a side of barbecue sauce or maybe some ranch dressing?

 

Human: No! What are you thinking? That is deplorable! How could you even ask that question? I love her!

 

Alien: We can share it. I’m not greedy. You can have some too.

 

Human: She is a She, not an It. Moreover, we do not eat babies. That is considered entirely unacceptable here.

 

Alien: I am sorry. Please pardon my ignorance of your social customs and norms. Do you maybe have one of those “roast beef sandwiches”? That would be delightful. I like those very much. I’m so hungry.

 

Human: Unfortunately, I do not. We have no food now.

 

Alien: Can we go get one of those sandwiches at the “Deli” two blocks over? I like the ones they make with that marble rye bread and Russian dressing. Those are good. Maybe a little “coleslaw” on the side? Maybe some potato chips or Doritos? Those nacho cheese Doritos. I like those very much.

 

Human: Yes, I very much enjoy those sandwiches and all of that other stuff as well. We could do that but I have no money since you forced me to stay here with you and I lost my job and stopped getting paid.

 

Alien: That’s all right. We can just use my death-ray laser gun. Those sandwiches are so delicious. Let’s just use my death-ray laser gun and get some delicious sandwiches, no? Maybe some coleslaw and potato salad and chips or nacho cheese Doritos on the side?

 

Human: I agree. Those sandwiches are indeed delicious, but it is entirely unacceptable to vaporize those people with your death-ray laser gun here.

 

Alien: I apologize. I didn’t know that. Can we just order some Chinese food? Have it delivered? Maybe some of that Mongolian Beef with fried rice? Not too spicy? Maybe some dumplings and egg rolls? Some of that duck sauce? I love that stuff.

 

Human: Sure, but how would we pay for it?

 

Alien: We could just use my death-ray laser gun when the dude gets here. No one will ever know, probably.

 

Human: I am hungry as well but I think I just told you that this is unacceptable here. Completely unacceptable.

 

Alien: You told me that it is unacceptable to vaporize the people at the delicious sandwich shop when we are in dire need of sandwiches. Maybe some potato salad on the side. Maybe some chips and soda. You said nothing about Chinese food delivery guys. I have nothing against Chinese dudes. I just need some Mongolian Beef. Spicy but, you know, not too spicy?

 

Human: I apologize. Allow me to clarify. The usage of your death-ray laser gun on anyone or anything is completely unacceptable here. It would draw unwanted attention.

 

Alien: Could I not simply eliminate that unwanted attention using my death-ray laser gun?

 

Human: I feel like we are going in circles here. What the fuck, man?

 

Alien: Sorry. I’m just hungry. What are we gonna eat, if not the baby?

 

Human: Well, without money and ruling out the usage of your death-ray laser gun we have limited options. Do you like ramen?

 

Alien: What is ramen?

 

Human: It’s like…these really cheap packaged noodles.

 

Alien: That sounds horrific. I think I’m going to that sandwich shop with my death-ray laser gun. What do you want on your roast beef sandwich? You want chips? A pickle? It’s all on me.

 

Human: I don’t think you are hearing the central message here. The main thing is that you cannot just randomly use your death-ray laser gun for trivial purposes.

 

Alien: Sustenance is trivial?

 

Human: No. That is not what I am saying. I’m just saying that we cannot commit random acts of mass murder for delicious roast beef sandwiches.

 

Alien: I am so hungry.

 

Human: Me too. We have not eaten in three days. We have to figure this out. I think ramen noodles are our best option right now.

 

Alien: Ramen noodles sound…unpromising. I need proteins.

 

Human: I understand, but without money we cannot purchase any food. I really don’t have any other suggestions at this time.

 

Alien: We can just use my death-ray laser gun.

 

Human: I think we have already covered the ground rules for usage of the death-ray laser gun.

 

Alien: Yes, but we have reached an impasse here. What will we eat?

 

Human: I don’t know. Maybe some ramen? You want some ramen?

 

Alien: I say we eat the delicious baby. Ramen sounds disgusting. No proteins.

 

Human: That is my baby daughter and that is completely and totally unacceptable.

 

Alien: I’m sorry. I’m just really hungry.

 

Human: Me too.

 

Alien: So what should we do?

 

Human: Well, there is a new and extremely pretentious and overpriced French restaurant over on Market Street that has been refusing service to any customers who do not meet their dress protocols and skin color standards. The owner is a convicted sexual offender.

 

Alien: Yeah, but how will we pay?

 

Human: Just bring your death-ray laser gun. It is acceptable.

 

Alien: This is very confusing, but okay. Do they serve Duck a l’Orange? I’m really in the mood for some duck a L’Orange. I like risotto too. Do they serve risotto? With mushrooms?

 

Human: That sounds delightful. I believe they do. Let me just grab my keys. Just look after the baby for a minute. Actually, never mind. I will just take her with me. Just wait here for a minute.

 

Alien: Sure thing, bro. I will just charge up my death-ray laser gun. Delicious-looking baby, by the way. You must be so proud.

 

Human: Can you please stop ruminating on the deliciousness of my baby?

 

Alien: Sure. Right after dinner.

 

Human: Okay. I’ll be right back. Charge up that death-ray laser gun.

 

THE END

 

Yes. No. Maybe.

I had a Lisa. Bought it for $100 at a computer shop when the previous owner took it in for repair and left it.

The Lisa was arguably the most technologically advanced PC on the market by a country mile, and it wasn’t even close. In a day when most computers came with 64K of RAM, the Lisa came with a megabyte, on a card larger than a letter-sized sheet of paper. It was built like a tank: you took the back off by flipping two toggles, then a military-style card cage slid out the back with the RAM, CPU, and I/O cards all sliding out. It had a 32-bit 68000 processor, and could run Mac System or LisaOS.

LisaOS was intended to run from a hard drive (in a day when hard drives were rare, my Lisa had an external Profile hard drive—it was the first computer with a hard drive I ever owned), and had some pretty forward thinking design ideas for the time. In the event of an irrecoverable crash, it saved the state of the system, all running programs, and all open files, rebooted, then re-opened all apps except the one that crashed, and restored all unsaved files, so your computer came back exactly as it had been minus whatever caused the crash. For 1983 that was really heckin’ slick.

Could they have made it cheaper? Yeah, you bet.

They could’ve shipped it with less RAM, a smaller screen, no hard drive, a motherboard that wasn’t engineered to milspec, no card cage, a smaller power supply, and that would’ve made it a lot cheaper.

Oh, wait, they did! Meet the cheaper Lisa:

The Angriest Scammer Reduced To A Sobbing Mess After Having Her Information Revealed